bolc
-
Posts
689 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by bolc
-
-
-
-
On 11/23/2018 at 11:54 AM, christopheorhan said:
Hi,
I can't pass my Asus vii impact for the bench reference.
He puts me there. viii impact, otherwise he refuses.
I still posted it;
thank youAckerman
if you edit the sub and retype: maximus vii i
does not it list the maximus vii impact ?
-
1
-
-
Hi. dual scores for the same 775 socket spotted for uUkraine in the gpupi1b stage5 contest.
http://oc-esports.io/#!/round/hwbot_country_cup_2018/4419/gpupi_for_cpu_-_1b_-_single_core_cpu_-_3_subs_required -
mcss service needs to be on, and after a pc reboot, it is fine !
(multimetia class scheduler service)
if you have the same pb, might be useful !-
1
-
-
poor laptop running 18h for the bench :D
-
1151 v1 (6xxx 7xxx?) and v2 (8xxx 9xxx?) are currently unified under one category only it seems
-
Hi Folks,
struggling with this guy, which does not allow to set the absolute mode on my rig for some reasons. ever had the sisue?
http://hwbot.org/benchmark/hevc_h.265_decode/thanks
-
met toi en x6 et sur c2d e8x00, tu vas poutrer bien au delà ;)
-
for the time being, your adata don t handle 540+ cas4 ?
won t be as good as 650+ cas5 but not far...
Ps: do you play with clock skew for cpu and mch. there are some magic numbers
same with mch ref and cpu gtl ref-
1
-
-
11 hours ago, quiekMew said:
i definitely used the 400MHz strap to do 690MHz and the 200Mhz one when attempting to do 666MHz IIRC
the ram will do what it can.
imo, not achieving high ram frequency has to do with the chipset not handling high fsb and ram frequency but not the rams.
otherwise i had a ep45 ud3p which would not do x 2.4 B (strap333) cas5 with fsb of 540+ ish so had to do 540+ cas4, but another board has no pb doing x2.4B cas5...
which mch, mch ref and ram ref voltages do you use ?
690/720 cas5 (tight?) at 2.3 V is sweet ! really. see if they can do spi32m, nonetheless, very impressive.-
1
-
-
too bad I don t live around, i d do it for free, well after borrowing your cpu
-
removing socket notches is easy, but making holes in the cpu pcb is fine too, but is a bit more risky for the cpu if you never did this before. the cpu is more rare than the board so you might want to do the board instead
but but for a 3014, a REX is likely better, series 3000 are compatible with x38/48, so if you plan to REX it later, you may make notches.
as far as you need to go :
-
nice score mate
hwbot seems down but am curious about those ddr2 ram not behaving as you want. we can chat avbout ddr2 timing if you want (and if you have d9gmh khx chips) -
1
-
-
18 hours ago, suzuki said:
This will make L3014 very cheap in the future. No way the xeon can catch a ddr3 run.
that d be great
any sample taking dust on your cabinet to sell?
-
On 11/9/2018 at 10:27 AM, bolc said:
hi all.
sorry if this has already been covered... but are sockets 1151 based on chipset 1xx 2xx and 3xx all considered to be the same and unique, for cpu stages 1 ,2 etc ?
i d think 1xx and 2xx as 1151 v1 and 3xx aa 1151 v2, but when you submit 7700k and 8700k, only the best remains. hence I suppose you adopted the POV of a unique 1151 socket ?
thanksBump
Thanks
-
cute board ! I d never think asrock could make a decent board
(so many prejudices, I know)
-
almost a year ago
-
4 hours ago, yosarianilives said:
I would like to report a bug in the configuration for the gpupi 1b single core comp limitations @Leeghoofd
Example A: https://hwbot.org/submission/3978772
Fastest damn single core I've ever seen
Link not working, or was but not anymore
This sub should not be linked in the competition, it is 8700K....
-
-
this bug can happen a lot. my workaround is to have 2 folders of cpu-z 1.86 (or keep the zip file closeby). delete the buggy cpu-z folder one and replace it with a fresh copy, then it will show the spd
somehow cpu-z gets "corrupted" and stops displaying spd tab or the real voltage and shows Vid instead
hope this works for you
-
hi all.
sorry if this has already been covered... but are sockets 1151 based on chipset 1xx 2xx and 3xx all considered to be the same and unique, for cpu stages 1 ,2 etc ?
i d think 1xx and 2xx as 1151 v1 and 3xx aa 1151 v2, but when you submit 7700k and 8700k, only the best remains. hence I suppose you adopted the POV of a unique 1151 socket ?
thanks -
-
good idea
3722 screened now.
yours can do 2300+ on the ram ?
I see your 2050 cas7 on the x265 4k
Multiple submissions from same benchmark showing up and awarding points to single user
in HWBOT Development: bugs, features and suggestions
Posted
well, you can t go manually and delete the sub... I mean you can, but it will appear all the time, and there is no way to control it.
plus, if for some reason the top score gets moderated, there will not be a second score in the database and will have to be re-+entered.
recalc the sub may put its score to 0 but will not remove it (hence ranking and medals are wrong).
Hitting the Recalculate Points button does not seem to work all the time. A recent example here with Nik's dual sub:
http://hwbot.org/benchmark/superpi_-_1m/rankings?start=6&hardwareTypeId=processor_1508#start=0#interval=20
for my teammates, i go check and recalc/delete the extra score, but there should be a way to find what is happening? it didn t happen in rev 6 didn t it ?