BenchZowner
-
Posts
690 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by BenchZowner
-
-
You don't need to buy the benchmark, you can publish projects with the "evaluation/free" version as well.
There's just a limit on the max simultaneously published projects.
-
But it can not be used to create a "no LOD" ranking due to human nature;)
Sad, but true
-
then it will come all down to sample selection
Agreed, totally.
LoD is a tweak, that is used to give us better scores by lowering the Image Quality ( in general
), it's a cheat if you think of it like "the developers used a +1 LoD for this test, etc" but competition-wise...oh well...there would be no competition in 3D Mark2001SE if LoD is considered illegal.It would come down to who has the best 'connections' in various manufacturers to get the very best cherrypicked CPU/RAM/VGAs.
What could be done for the guys not liking LoD would be a filter to provide results and charts with and without LoD ( having a "LoD Used" or "Not" field @ the submit results form )
-
Hmm...there should be an old MMX 233 in my storage room.
How 'bout a -196C MMX 233 OC ? [ oh wait, I need to make a new mounting for the tube
] -
Start -> Settings -> Control Panel -> Add/Remove Programs.
Select nVIDIA Drivers, and click uninstall...
However when changing motherboards its better ( and recommended ) to perform a clean windows installation.
-
I can't stand idly by when people start cheering for themselves!
go PEOPLE
that should cover it!
Well, if it wasn't that obvious, I was kidding
-
no no no, go BenchZone!
-
3D Mark2001SE detects the 256MB XTs as 512MB Memory.
And the 512MB XTs as 1024MB.
-
You should point ( link ) out the in-mind results when reporting such stuff m8.
By the way, it's usually a user error [ unless he does that on purpose to get more points
] -
Well, I just noticed that there's a user with 2 accounts, and posting the results on both accounts.
Username 1: Quentin*OCM* ( Overclocking Masters )
Username 2: Quentin ( Overclocking Masters )
-
-
-
-
George reported by accident ( I'm quite sure ) his X1800XT 512MB as X1800XT 256MB.
-
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=558183
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=5061107
4305MHz Core 2 - X1800XT 256MB @ 720/765 = 22904 Marks @ 3Dm03 /// vs 3708MHz Core2 - X1800XT 256 ( ??? nope ) @ 620/747 = 23646 3dm 03
-
Another score of his X1800XT 512MB reported as X1800XT 256MB
-
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9030684
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=550894
check out the reported as suspicious scores a little bit better please.
-
Username: Epox for life
Benchmarks using X1900XTX CF Edition card registering it as X1800XT 256MB @ HW Bot Result
here
-
The user mentioned on the thread title ( Sveinbra - Xtremesystems team ) has posted some scores with his POV SLI 7800GT as Single Card.
crucial ballistix tracer
in General hardware discussion
Posted
It's the same like the "normal" Ballistix, just with some "flashy" LEDs...apart from that they're both the same, and using Micron D9GMH chips [ the best chips for DDR2 ]
They'll do at least what the average D9GMH kit can do...more or less ? depends on your luck.
You can pick a kit which will do DDR2-1150 with 5-5-5-15 timings, you can also pick a kit which will reach DDR2-1250 with 5-5-5-15 timings...it's all about luck as long as you pick up a kit with D9GMH/D9GKX chips