Strunkenbold
-
Posts
2209 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
39
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Strunkenbold
-
-
Whats wrong about this one: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/alivesata2_glan/
-
Strunkenbold, this is a very old submission with GPUPI 1.3, that was done manually, not via the HWBOT integration. The user made the mistake to enter the wrong calculation time. Please report it to a moderator, it should get fixed or removed.
Ahh that explains quite a bit. I thought it had been done via integration since I cant edit this score field. Someone has todo this manually then.
-
Wont be added. Enter in X3 440 and set unlocked to 4 cores.
-
-
-
eg show - what is this card nv40 64 bit? Photo this card? I am not found nothing similar in Google. Who added this card, and why?
OK, but why is http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/all_in_wonder_radeon_ddr/ Remind how it added? Post number #55 in this topic Quickly and no questions
Turricans strategy was adding anything which had something different on GPU-Z / CPU-Z screen and did not show up in db. This was the fastest solution and I guess because of the huge amount of hardware which needed to be added it was the right one. Unfortunately this created also some problems like categorys for never existed hardware like the famous Athlon MP 1700+.
When Antinomy took over his strategy was creating a db as exact as possible. And this takes time.
About that 64bit NV40: http://web.archive.org/web/20080208081509/http://www.biostar.com.tw/app/en-us/vga/content.php?S_ID=40
-
Thx, this seems to be really a rare one. I just knew about Rage GL PCI. Will add later.
-
Theres no special magic behind this. FSB was always shown on Socket 7 boards but just in combination with K6-2 and up cpus. All others showed no FSB. But still right frequency. L2 cache is shown with K6-2 but disappeared with K6-3+ and vice versa.
This is just another example how hard it is for Frank to support these old boards. But what me make start thinking is that totally wrong results are being validated.
And as always the only thing todo is report bugs to Frank or in the CPU-Z Bugs thread.
-
-
Announcement has been made:
http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=141629
And yeah it seems this year its about the honor.
-
mat, Im sorry that I dont want to read through those lengthy thread so in case this has been already asked, Im sorry but is this: http://hwbot.org/submission/2822546_amd_radeon_gpupi___1b_radeon_r9_290x_20sec_680ms
correct?
Reduction time should be added on calculation time, but here it looks like reduction time is ignored.
-
Ok here some explanations:
-8mb TNT cards, Chris Ney promised testing for performance differences but until now he didnt report back
-AIW wont be added anymore. I will have to go through db and merge all already existing cards
-6800 cards, I made a list with the cards needed to be added. Probably need to go through all subs and sort them according their specs. A lot time needed
-same for rage cards, created a list with models I think that they have existed. Though I have no card with SGR mems would really like to know what GPU-Z is showing. I ordered as much different cards on ebay as I could find. I crawled through a lot of websites, still I cant reliable say that my list is complete and correct
Oh and did you know? I dont get money for this. Im working as a volunteer on this but I cant even list this as a reference cause nobody in industry cares. "What did you? Working as db moderator for hwbot? lol!"
So its really up to me for what Im spending my time, though its clear adding a motherboard takes 2 minutes. For those rage and 6800 changes its hours.
-
1,3,5 and 6 fixed.
We probably need to ask Antinomy about 4
-
Thank you for what the for "others" is added same as for "their"
Thank you for fair play!
There is simply a plot against you!
No serious, I need more time to make these changes. Its on my todo list. But there is much on my todo list.
-
Ah sorry, I thought it was affected by the same db bug we see for some results.
Guess I learned something today. Though that fsb is incredible high for a sis...
-
hwbot db bug.
This was some different mobo.
-
Last time I tried an Aladdin board results where painfully slow. Dont know why even register tweaked, results were awful.
There is no secret about my results: 120Mhz FSB L2 & L3 enabled and because of 128mb Ram they should run in Writeback mode.
Im yet to find a board which can run 140Mhz, maybe its faster than without cache.
-
http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce2_mx400_64mb_ddr_64bit_pci/
http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/firepro_v5700/
Please post a picture of that Rage card especial used core. GPU-Z and everest would be also nice.
-
-
added
-
All done.
Seems that VT8754 is indeed P4X400 but does CPU-Z still show PT800?
-
lol, little Celeron is faster than most Tualatins. Great time!
-
I'll make this more clear, in the CPU low clock many of the subs are rejected by CPUz if you follow the links. Are these still legitimate
Actually u are correct. Rejected results arent valid but remember: we had for years rejected Socket A results that were 100% valid. It was simply a CPU-Z bug.
Im in no position to decide something, so its up to Massman I guess.
-
Well there are simply too many 2600+ in db. Should have appeared when you enterd Sempron 2600+ though.
Pls add image for Asus TXP4-X mobo
in Support
Posted
done