Jump to content

Sadhiq

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Sadhiq

  1. Here : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=788702 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=788683
  2. Hi, I posted some results for which I should earn points : I earned them for SuperPi, CPU-Z, etc. but nothing for Wprime... Thanks for your answer
  3. Sadhiq replied to demiurg's post in a topic in General overclocking
    I think everything's fair... CPU-Z is pure speed, for performances, you still have all the benches
  4. Don't forget that many people like to bench old HW For sure boints aren't as high for oldies than for the WR of 3D mark !
  5. Sadhiq replied to MaXtoRZP's post in a topic in General overclocking
    for sure nforce 4 doesn't beat records in fsb I can't help you with your SLI problem, I've never used it
  6. Sadhiq replied to MaXtoRZP's post in a topic in General overclocking
    yep, there is indeed a problem? And btw, the cpu won't go higher even with more voltage?
  7. Hello guys, my X1900GT is recognised by the ORB of 3DMark as a 512Mb whereas it's a 256Mb, I know it has been reported as suspicious so I post here in order that you don't place it in another category! Thanks
  8. Sadhiq replied to Tazzler's post in a topic in General overclocking
    yep, it seems perfect to me like that
  9. Sadhiq replied to Tazzler's post in a topic in General overclocking
    or better, a multiple choice box with only some answer: -aircooled -watercooled -waterchilled -phase change -ln² If it's purely informational, I think this way should be really easier, one box for cpu and another for gpu
  10. Sadhiq replied to DEVILEK's post in a topic in Offtopic
    Happy new year everybody!
  11. Sadhiq replied to s1ugh34d's post in a topic in General overclocking
    done
  12. Sadhiq replied to K404's post in a topic in Offtopic
    indeed time to spend some time with the family
  13. because here http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=5061107 we can see 512Mb and it isn't the 2001 version
  14. ok, so its 256Mb card is reported as a 512Mb by 3Dmark01 only?
  15. Sadhiq replied to s1ugh34d's post in a topic in General overclocking
    so, AM2 added, but I've got to make some slight changes to have it perfect wait one day and it'll be finished
  16. Sadhiq replied to s1ugh34d's post in a topic in General overclocking
    ok, I'll fix this as soon as possible
  17. I think he stopped posting on Quentin
  18. the guy is wwwww from i4memory.com, just ask him, he's surely using a double FX
  19. Sadhiq replied to mtzki's post in a topic in Submission & member moderation
    yep i also was
  20. Sadhiq replied to mtzki's post in a topic in Submission & member moderation
    at least people seem ready to adopt it
  21. yep I agree, the current system is fair, but it could be improved a bit... For some catergories, people should get more boints, I can give an example with my personal hw, I have 11900marks in 3Dmarks 05 with à X1900GT & opty 165, which was really hard to achieve because all the scores up me are C2D. The thing is that I've overclocked my X1900GT far more than they have, but they got the points for their CPU's (except for one)... I think we should give a little amount of points for frequency results, we need something like CPU-Z for graphic cards
  22. Sadhiq replied to Predator's post in a topic in General overclocking
    I like it very much, it would indeed be very funny to see our ranking in national leagues! I don't know how hard this is to make it work, but that would be great if we could see national rankings and global rankings for each member