George_o/c

Congrats man on your 5GHz SPi run with the E8500 I've noticed that you were more careful with your photo this time

That's why in case the validation of xs is not working (it's been some time now ...), we make a nice screenshot with CPU-Z and if you want memset ... Nobody's gonna tell you anything if you do that For example, how on earth can someone know that this SPi 1M run of yours, is an outcome of an E8500 and not a QX9650 for example ... ? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706152 Take a look at my screenie for example ...

Where is the problem ... ? I think that the guys were pretty clear about the reasons the blocked your score ... Like it's too difficult to rebench with the latest version of 3D Mark ...

Thanks a zillion times guys !

Holy shit ! This guy's 3D Marks have no resolution AT ALL ... So, that means that he could have faked them all by not using the standard benchmark resolution ? ... I think you 'll have to wait like all of us do ... They have to compete with a huuuuuge amount of results, unfortunately ...

Thanks a million, demiurg ! But what about that ? ... http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=16137&postcount=1092

It's been a while now, and I haven't seen a new category for X1650 pci-e I'd also like to add some pretty-messed up results : GeForce 6800 GS (NV40) AGP category http://www.hwbot.org/ResultBrowseByVideoCard.do?gpuModelId=911 ALL THE AM3 RESULTS POSTED IN THAT CATEGORY, ARE DONE WITH PCI-E 6800GS VGAs ... I don't know if all these guys are THAT confused, that they can not tell which is the PCI-E and which is the AGP category, but they are in the wrong category ! GeForce 6800 GS (NV42) AGP category http://www.hwbot.org/ResultBrowseByVideoCard.do?gpuModelId=1268 Well, there is only one guy benching this specific card ... But guess what ? He managed to bench two 6800GS AGP VGAs in SLi ... He's clearly mistaken, it's pretty damn obvious Maybe because, the NV42 core is both in AGP and in PCI-E 6800GSs Thus, could someone move them plz ? Thank you George

Thanks a lot ... Firstly you are playing unfair by posting with a PCI-E VGA, to an AGP category (come on dude, you know it's unfair, but you pretend everything's right, god damn' it ! ), and secondly you indirectly call me silly ... I let knopflerbruce speak for myself

Please ! Somebody has to take that into consideration ... It's another card ...

All right Nordling ... I'm telling you we have different cards ... Don't make me angry now, it's so simple ... X1650 AGP and X1650 PCI-E ARE DIFFERENT ! I didn't implement that you posted results done with a X1650 Pro, but that you are in the wrong category ... In my defense when I saw that there is no proper category for my X1650 AGP I PMed Bwanasoft and he created it ... Why don't you do the same thing, so that a new X1650 PCI-E category is created ? ...

The following results that Nordling posted are not in the right category ... He has posted in the X1650 agp category, while using a X1650 pci-e card ... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701989 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701990 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701991 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701992 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701993 I think it's quite obvious, 'cause he is using a P5E3 WS Pro, a motherboard that's it's commonly known supports only pci-e VGAs, and not AGP ones Take a look at his photos too ... In GPU-Z it's stated : I'm not implementing that Nordling did it on purpose btw Just, that he is clearly mistaken ...

Take a look at this P4 3GHz Northwood SPi 1M done by NoOsPhErE ... http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506020 It's the top SPi for that cpu category ... Now looking at it, it seemed really weird as F.O.G.N.A who has the second SPi 1M place ... He managed to get 30 seconds with the cpu at almost 5GHz ... But NoOsPhErE, managed to do 29 seconds with his cpu at only 4350MHz ... Isn't it a little weird ? Of course it is Take a look at NoOsPhErE' s validation (well not validation, it's a link to forumpost ) ... This specific SPi 1M time was done with a Pentium D 830 @ 4350MHz ... It's a dualcore, and the ram is of course DDR2 ... http://www.techzonept.com/showpost.php?p=696467 How is that validation possible ? It's pretty damn obvious that he is using a different cpu, as it's also clearly stated in the link to forumpost ...

Wow ! ... Fatallity ... I am curious about what will happen ... PS : George, it's high time you posted, so that everything is straightened out ... Nice job dude, keep your results coming

Why's that again ?

Massman I edited my post, added two more ...

Well, for the past month I've noticed several results that look suspicious ... Some of 'em are totally irrational, makes me wanna laugh ! ... 1) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665503 9225 GFX score with a 7200GS 64MB ... That much score seems to be done with a 7600GT or other relevant VGAs ... But not with a 7200GS, for sure 2) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=662387 2 x 7200GS on an Asrock P4VM890 ... LoL ! But that mobo has only 1 x PCI Express x16 slot ... How on h3ll did he fit two of 'em there ? And even if it was true (which is obviously not !), he gets only 400 marks more than the above-mentioned score done with the same hardware ? For Christ's shake ! ... I've got more of 'em ... 3) 7200GS 128MB :http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684065 Harleybro managed to get 35463 AM3 score, with a QX9650 @ 4.6GHz and a weak 7200GS 128MB @ 622/901 ... Nice score, perfectly rational, if the setup is taken into consideration (Congrats Harleybro btw ! ) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669397 manos444444 manages to get 58485 AM3 score with a P4 3.0GHz @ 3MHz (he is clearly mistaken, 3GHz was what he should write) and a stock 7200GS ... Compare these two scores ... I think manos's score is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay weird ... (). I think you got it 4) Same guy, again ... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665908 Totally weird 7200GS 256MB AM3 score ... I think that the specific hwbot user, found an easy way of getting points ... Running some AM3 benches with his hardware, uploads the screen shot mentioning that he uses a 7200GS ... all of 'em 64MB, 128MB, 256MB ... Maybe because the number of users benching with a 7200GS is small, thus he though it's an "easy" category ... Not smart enough, I should say ... Especially the SLi setup, with an Asrock mobo that has only one PCI-E x16 slot ... ROFL ! 5) Again ... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676076 Same user ... 9.5k AM3 score with a 5100 Go ? (LOoooOL ) That card performs like 600 GFX score only ... He uses the same core/mem frequencies in all of his entries (400/400) when the correct 5100 Go freqs are 300/600 ... 6) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685758 He has neither a verification image, nor a verification image url, nor a futuremark url ... Therefore, how is his score confirmed ? Moreover he uses an n-Vidia 8800GTX, but his entry is in the 5100 Go category ... That's why the second 3D 01 5100 Go score is 70k lower