George_o/c

That's what I'm talking about!

That would be incredibly interesting! 6.9GHz 2k1 on 980X... Hmmm, should be still slower than Vince's 6.6GHz E8600.

Congrats Brian! I wish you all the best in your future 2k1 endeavors

Holy shit! Congrats

Dude are you sure about that? You quit for real?

Awesome

4760MHz benchable on AIR? OMG!

Happy birthday Gradus!

^^ Exactly

+1 for this! Achievements should showcase the result(s) that a person submitted in order to get this achievement

Congrats Andre, great score! Why Vista though? I thought that 2k6 liked XP more =)

I'll wait

Yes it's allowed. Not a new rule, it's been implemented since 2008!

Thanks for taking the time Pieter-Jan, all cleared up now

I have one more question I'd like to address to hwbot staff as far as the Pro League is concerned. Let's say that currently 5 top overclockers all join the Pro League, ok? I imagine that apart from the hardware they occasionaly get now, manufacturers are going to back them up with much more so that they crush WRs and inevitably advertise the components used. Now, couple pages back Frederik stated that according to his point of view if someone isn't at least in the top50 of the amature league he won't manage to compete the big ones from the pro league. How are you going to arrange when someone leaves the pro league so that someone else from the amature league steps up? I suppose that manufacturers already have their favorite overclockers, but can one guarantee that they are going to back up someone else in the pro league, apart from their "favorites"? Will someone from the pros forced to leave the league if he came out last after a specific period of time? And moreover will the pro league be a "closed circle" in which ostensibly everybody has a chance but literally the manufacturers will have absolute control of? In case someone thinks I'm complaining, no I'm not! In post #21 I clearly stated that I'm all in for the whole idea and I'm looking forward to seeing it take off sucessfully. I just happen to have some more questions regarding the pro league

Nice How many CPUs have you tested? Batch?

DEVILEK I think you are a bit late in the hardware sharing conversation. We've decided like 2 years ago that it's ok for someone to share everything for a 3D result, as long as the VGA is owned by the person uploading the result. It's also ok for someone to share everything for a 2D result, as long as the CPU is owned by the person uploading the result.

Maybe there's someone that can help you out with that my friend? But are 169.21 really better than 173.67 which are natively supported by 9800GX2?

Marco your 980X is good my friend, congrats for the 30k run Does it do 6GHz full Vantage, or only GPU tests? Can't wait for you to mod that 480!

900 6-6-5, nice! And with cosiderably low voltage, at least for GTR standards However, I always though that Hypers are the way to go now, even for older LGA775 platforms like X48.

I fully agree with the whole idea Massman! Only thing I haven't yet completely understood, is how are you going to prevent guys from binning hardware in mainstream competitions. I really don't think that that's something you can take control of. Also, If I get this right, money prizes will only be given away to extreme competition winners? Therefore, winners of Mainstream competitions win high-end hardware? If yeah, then it sounds fully rational, I'm all in for that one as well

D9GTR chips Sam?

OMG! 6200MHz 1M on E8400!

Dedicated to George_o/c? Thanks thanks you guys make me blush

I have that board sitting here since January, along with a X2 250, but didn't even bother to test it so far