Leeghoofd

not sure what you are on about: https://hwbot.org/submission/5118675

all gone

Rules mention: Use 4,6,10,12 processor core(s) in total. This means one sub with a 4 core, one with a 6 core and so on. You submit with your 10 core 6590X but the 10900K from Bavor is quicker so his score counts.

It's there for sure... ( LINK )

indeed its configured correctly but sometimes the API seems to block/refuse the submission. It's passed onto the programmers.

Plz use the official background wallpaper

A verification screenshot is required, using the official background, score, CPU-Z 2.0.3 tabs for CPU, motherboard and memory. 3% variation allowed

K Average fix patch is in place for Country Cup, plz check your scores ladies and gents

well I run a 4K screen and can up each benchmate score flawlessly Mat, all hex keys and co are checked, verified and identical as before the migration. I asked for benchmate datafiles of the troublesome scores from the guy on Discord, I didn't get anything to confirm your ideas ( regarding file size or whatever)

Pls check out the rules at the frontpage ( https://hwbot.org/benchmarkRules ) and take a look at the sample screenshots. eg AMD on Win8/10/11 requires BenchMate Geekbenches require CPUZ tabs for CPU and memory 3DMark01 requires the subtests to be displayed ... Cleaning up your results

Works fine here, maybe you experienced a timeout error https://hwbot.org/submission/5116803_leeghoofd_gpupi_v3.3___1b_geforce_rtx_3090_ti_2sec_756ms

Seems we are both old and trired ? for the CB R20 your score is taken into account , the average scores are correct, but we are testing a bug fix for the wrong display of that correct average on UAT. If you and the rest submits their scores there we can evaluate if the display is correct... soon as we have more feeback, scores we can push this fix to HWBOT.

Plz check out the submission rules at the frontpage, some of your submissions lacked CPUZ tabs for CPU and memory https://hwbot.org/benchmarkRules

Plz check out the submission rules at the frontpage, some of your submissions lacked CPUZ tabs for CPU and memory https://hwbot.org/benchmarkRules

Plz check out the submission rules at the frontpage, some of your submissions lacked CPUZ tabs for CPU and memory https://hwbot.org/benchmarkRules

Plz check out the submission rules at the frontpage, some of your submissions lack CPUZ tabs for CPU and memory https://hwbot.org/benchmarkRules

Plz check out the submission ruels at the frontpage, your submissions lacks CPUZ tabs for CPU and memory https://hwbot.org/benchmarkRules

Plz check out the submission ruels at the frontpage, some of your submissions lacked CPUZ tabs for CPU and memory https://hwbot.org/benchmarkRules I removed the incorrect ones

Plz check out the submission ruels at the frontpage, your submissions lack CPUZ tabs for CPU and memory https://hwbot.org/benchmarkRules

Giving up is for pussies, Greeks are not quitters K it's a U CPU not a H, but it is still a 6 core.... look what happened if I pull this one from the compo... his 3100 score pops up...

only one 6 core will count , the 5600x outperforms the 5600H

@Doomed83 @Solid State Alchemy @Forks @TASOS @Mr.Scott @Cali_amr @Hilderman @Goku is Gei @exaberries @Hudson13 @Bavor K we tested the average fix on the UAT test server, it looks good, but we would request from you to submit also at the uat.hwbot.org ( remember it is slow ) for the Country Cup. this will allow to quickly find errors by your feedback. Take note that not all current scores are there, so if possible submit all the scores you subbed already at the standard HWBOT to the UAT one too plz (bewerkt) So Team USA we count on you! Other countries can also submit at https://uat.hwbot.org/ The sooner we can finish the testing, the sooner we can push this to production and leave another bug behind us...

euh the stage mentions : Use 4,6,8,12,16 processor core(s) in total. 5600X and the 5600H are both 6 cores.... so only one score will count, you need to submit with the other processor cores too For the average score it took your score into account: 81 seconds divided by 5 is 16 seconds something... If it was the Ultraex2005 score of 130 seconds it would be 26 seconds average...

yes The average score listed at the stage page is correct. The programmer is fixing the shown submissions that are part of this correct average score, as currently they are not properly listed if you click the average score in the stage ranking... Easiest thing for the teams to follow up is to make an excel and verify our average with yours... But keeping in mind if users submit multiple hardware scores that they can block other country members' scores...

Thanks for the picture, interesting PCIe riser, what brand is that ?