
SteveRo
Members-
Posts
1084 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by SteveRo
-
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
SteveRo replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
I think futuremark link required for all top 20 (global or H/W) is a great idea. If we have that I reco we not require results.txt. Futuremark link or results.txt required for ALL submissions. Wadaya think? -
Moose83 - Core 2 Q6600 (2.4Ghz) @ 4347MHz - 40054 marks PCMark 2005
SteveRo replied to SteveRo's topic in Result Discussions
I thought it was areca but couldn't remember, well done! -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
SteveRo replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
Good Morning Master Leeghoofd - also for Mister's Pro and Sweet, I don't believe changing HDD sector size should be legal because it tricks the pcm05 benchmark into thinking the HDD subtests ran faster than it really did. The amd raid expert s/w isn't the only way to do this, it can be done easily with any setup amd or intel. To do this requires only one ssd - easy to get 9500+MB/s on just about anything except for 1x core - simply by increasing the drive sector size. For this reason I think we should NOT allow it. -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
SteveRo replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
Very good Mr. Pro, understood, I will inform my teammates and delete all my submissions that have used this tweak, thanks again for doing this for us. edit - I have deleted all of my submissions that used this tweak (10 total). I now have no pcm05 submissions since 09May. -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
SteveRo replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
Good morning Master Pro, Much thanks for doing this for us, I just pm'd you my team's TW tweak, please take a look when you have a moment. Much thanks! -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
SteveRo replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
I feel your pain, I've sold four of my acards - can someone talk to the buyers and get them back for me? Oh, well. -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
SteveRo replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
Good morning Mr. Sweet, The TW tweak that I was using was using non-OS s/w to minimize the transp. windows. Is this an illegal tweak? Not sure. All of my submissions since 09May used this tweak and I will delete them when so directed. edit - PM'd Master Pro with the tweak for his assessment. -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
SteveRo replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
Mr. Sweet, one other item, looking for clarification - for many of my most recent submissions I have used non-OS s/w that helps TW. Do I need to remove these submissions? -
Moose83 - FX-8120 @ 5728MHz - 44373 marks PCMark 2005
SteveRo replied to SteveRo's topic in Result Discussions
Well then, congrats! -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
SteveRo replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
Looking for clarification Mr. Sweet: For many of my most recent submissions I have used non-OS s/w that helps TW. Is all non-OS s/w now disallowed? Iometer ok for limiting xp startup? -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
SteveRo replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
Hmm ... If changing sector size is allowed to fool pcm05 we will see ~10k virus scan across the board, I can do this on both amd and intel, actually pretty much any mobo. Also - I have used non-OS s/w for some of my latest submissions but not flash desktop. Are we going to ban using iometer for xpstartup? -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
SteveRo replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
Guys, Mr. Moose, Is AMD RAIDXpert changing the sector size still allowed, is changing sector size on any drive allowed, why just amd? - http://hwbot.org/submission/2323211_moose83_pcmark_2005_fx_8120_44373_marks/ -
So I am confused, I thought tricking pcm05 by using a different HD sector size is not allowed or is it??
-
topdog - Phenom II X4 960T BE @ 4941MHz - 54622 marks PCMark 2005
SteveRo replied to Moose83's topic in Result Discussions
nice run but virus scan 9448? what did you use for storage? -
leeghoofd - Sempron 145 @ 3794MHz - 22460 marks PCMark 2005
SteveRo replied to Blackbolt's topic in Result Discussions
Good work! -
Gluvocio - Core i7 2600K @ 4633MHz - 104012 marks PCMark 2005
SteveRo replied to Moose83's topic in Result Discussions
Well done Denis!! and w/o text edit even, wow! -
SteveRo - Core i7 3770K @ 6044.1MHz - 67295 marks PCMark 2005
SteveRo replied to l0ud_sil3nc3's topic in Result Discussions
^^ This has to be the most expensive hobby I've ever pursued -
Tiltevros - Core i7 3770K @ 5702.2MHz - 48892 marks PCMark Vantage
SteveRo replied to Computurd's topic in Result Discussions
Good job Tilt!! -
SteveRo - Core i7 3770K @ 6044.1MHz - 67295 marks PCMark 2005
SteveRo replied to l0ud_sil3nc3's topic in Result Discussions
^ Thanks guys!! -
Moose83 - Core i5 661 @ 5642MHz - 47913 marks PCMark 2005
SteveRo replied to Dinos111's topic in Result Discussions
Without the supertweaks we are ALL duck soup now! -
SteveRo - Core i7 980 @ 5626.1MHz - 57352 marks PCMark 2005
SteveRo replied to Moose83's topic in Result Discussions
^ I think Denis is sandbagging us!! -
SteveRo - Phenom II X2 555 BE @ 5769.2MHz - 48692 marks PCMark 2005
SteveRo replied to Moose83's topic in Result Discussions
^^ When you get cold enough you should have the WR my friend!