-
Posts
1216 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
11
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by speed.fastest
-
-
- 4
-
Too good! Congrats!
-
12100KF needed lol
-
In my test for 3DMark03 and 05 on Alderlake, score is scaling with core count which is very weird and i never seen this until now on this benchmark. And e core is useless on Windows 7 even on 3DMark11. Try 8c/8t or 8c/16t! it score much higher on 03 and 05, and i still using 60hz monitor. No high refresh rate monitor at the moment.
- 1
-
-
Great efficiency there!
-
Good job! Nice score there ?
-
-
Crazy CPU and great work!
-
-
Crazy score and system!
-
This is like allowing i9 12900K/KF to competing in 2 core category with i7 7350K, this is my point. Even on the same gen is like allowing i7 7700K to compete againts i3 7350K, its same performance core but still different.
-
Nice job Bullant! WR again
- 1
-
2 hours ago, Leeghoofd said:
You loose points, I loose points, unless you bench the newest architecture.
It's always like this and will be the same again soon when AMD releases their oomphed Ryzens. Rankings will shift once more and this will happen over and over again. Hardware is released at a way higher pace than before, where it was more common for a release like once a year. Nowadays we have 2-3 times a serious performance gain. Neverending story...
Hence why I only bench for hardware masters. Hardware points stay, globals and such not...With 12900K as 16c only category, and 12600K 10c only category, people have less point drop overnight than 12900K as 8C and 12600K as 6C. Sure next gen will have a lot more cores but why force to kill older cpu points? 12900K vs 5800X and 12600K vs 5600X doesnt seem fair at all.
- 1
-
Masterpiece!
-
Very impressive! Great job!
-
What next? only Prime95 48 hours stable with all cores and ht enabled stable for CPU-Z Validation maybe?
- 1
-
Im okay if disabled e cores but score is in with original category, meaning 12900K is still in 16 cores category. My guess is maybe e cores causing cold bug or bad behaviour under cold.
- 1
-
-
Treat it as it is, 16C is still 16C doesnt matter slower core, faster core, or different clocked between core, core count is still same. If 12900K/KF lose to 5950X/10960X, leave it as it is, because actual multithreading performance is slower, they still have single core performance advantages anyway. No need more complicated rules, now is already complicated enough.
- 11
-
Finally you got it, congrats!
-
Nice result, congrats!
-
-
5 hours ago, NewdieMem.101 said:
Hi anyone can help me pls because i cant make it work with 2x16 3200 cl14 gskill kit with my 10850k.
Firstly I've tried 0088 bios from this forum and all auto with xmp linpack bootable wasn't stable and tried 1003 bios from asus and linpack passed. And why I've tried this? Because I couldn't even find a baseline for my kit to oc. So today I've managed easily to test anta with 3600mhz with 16-16-16-36 and passed I'm still on trying phase and don't know how to find anything stable so any help or suggestions are welcome. So firstly i dont know what bios to use for my 10850k with sp 57
and second is my imc holding me or mem. And for once ive passed anta with 14-16-16-32 4000mhz and cant anymore.
Put fan on mem, for more realible stability.
speed.fastest - Core i3 12100F @ 5390MHz - 4206 cb Cinebench - R20
in Result Discussions
Posted