Bullant
-
Posts
509 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
9
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Bullant
-
-
Some PSC I bough little while ago, never tried these before...they seem to max out at 1.89v that's not the best sign for cold. I might test them cold on another platform
Just a stabilty test no waza and had most things open while running
GSkill Pi 2400Mhz 9-11-9 kit
-
2
-
-
-
On 10/15/2018 at 12:59 PM, suzuki said:
I am missing an option from bios on classy which it is on Asus . I estimated at least a 3 s improvement but 36” seems doable if you have everything right ,like ram on ln2.
Got a Improved score yet suzuki?
-
Nice job Nox
-
1
-
-
KO 8117 can also be good, if you can't find KO 8155
-
2
-
-
I haven't spent much time on it really, being a new platform for me too, when I have little more time I'm sure I'll get it working, either setfsb, raising multi only within windows with correct easytune.
with 9900k and z390 launch I'm pretty keen to try that atm so not sure when I'll get time on 1366 and all the other legacy platforms I have atm ahah
-
3 hours ago, Chilli-Man said:
nice result mate. yeah it's a CPUz and X58 bug, the multi doesn't actually change.
Thanks chilli mate
thanks also pointing out Rusty or is it ground1556 ? Your name comes up different twice ahah
-
With the easytune I'm using it wouldn't allow me to adjust multi within window, 255 blck was its limit...when trying 256 blck it would lockup even when booting higher blck to windows
when I try again I can look for a new easytune or something to see if can move multi within windows
the other thing I can do next time is boot 22x multi and 251 blck and then blck to 255 this way the multi should stay at 22x, I think the multi is only downclocking after 5 blck adjustment within windows
-
Yes man it's what is happening, I was booting with 22 multi, 245-250 blck then up to 255 within windows....it was down clocking to multi 21x after blck adjustment.
I thought it it was just the platform or system, so you think even tho CPUz has downclock 21x from bug that the multi is still 22x? If true that would make core 5.5xx.?
The result is legit it just is possible as you say that it could still be 22x multi that would make it higher freq then cpuz is reporting
-
1
-
-
-
It's all that was need at the time man, if ran at 7ghz CPU it could see close to 200k....I'll try with new platform when I have it
-
Nice job Suzuki, I'll join in once I have the gear.... The only one I've seen around is from "pro" 8m 36.5xx he's at 47xx nb I think
-
On 10/10/2018 at 12:33 AM, Gyrock said:
Nice! GJ! i think need OS tweak more and more to go faster with the same cpu clock. AMD system is effected by tweak more compared to intel system, i think. To tweak allocated memory size is the key, i think. Hope this will help u
Hey mate, didn't see you posted, thanks for the tip, I'll let you know how I go
thanks
-
Hey Nox, you tried putting a USB header on the bottom of the ocf board and running USB from thier ? Or the pcie USB thing in the gpu slot we use on z270 onwards for w7-xp?
The impact is little different board, I've not really had enough time on it to suggest something.Your best bet is Sam or Alex
I've been looking locally for a cheap impact to try myself
-
Was testing PSC other night on 1090t a fail run on loop 5.... the couple runs I tried.The cpu was -50 and memory -30, memory will tighten up more but seems imc related issue on the freq side. Given little more time should improve, will try more cpus and boards as I find them within my budget ahahah
-
-
1 hour ago, subaruwrc said:
How much vcore u push?
my 555 likes a LOT of volts but worse imc than this
I tried up to 1.95v mate
-
5 hours ago, subaruwrc said:
really strong imc on that chip. eff is killer as always
Thanks man, I try more core even with lower NB and lower memory freq but just can't do much more. Had few more faster runs 6.060 core and 37xx NB but keep failing loop 15-21
I have one more x2 555 to try cold but it was worse then this one in testing water lol, Will try 1090t tonight
5 hours ago, Andreat85 said:...nice one bro ! SPI 32 man
Lol
Lol thanks man, you know I love 32m ahah I waiting on 9900k and new boards to be available then 3D legacy
3 hours ago, Mr.Scott said:You are a Pi master.
Glad to have you on the team.
Thanks Scott, glad to be part of the team, very nice bunch of guys
thanks for having me
1 hour ago, I.nfraR.ed said:Very nice! FX890 is the way to go. Honestly, you're the only one with proper efficiency in the comp I've seen so far. Your eff is better than mine and it seems you're spending a lot of time benching 32M on AM3 recently. If you find golden CPU, I will have to rebench and try to improve
Thanks for the kind words man, I also highly respect your 32m too, yeah I've spent last couple weeks working on eff, with OS, waza and timings.....it's been fun learning this amd stuff.
Its funny how so different each chip is, imc, CPU freq , NB and cores
I have a 990fx ud3 coming that I'll try soon, see if eff is ok or worse....will post up results with it when I get it
-
-
-
-
1090t on Single stage -30
-
1
-
-
Nice job man....
-
Did a little eff testing today on the 955 amd, is ran on single stage -30 and memory are 1.83v set bios....will run on ln2 next time refill, should see good boost when push the uncore more
-
2
-
Gigabyte Z97X-SOC Force-PSC
in Memory Heaven (air/extreme)
Posted · Edited by Bullant
Hey ,
i just hold the ss on the CPU unto the ss gets cold and then once frozen the paste will hold the ss to the CPU ahah
I ran a quick 1366 with my x5650 and psc air 40.9xx 6-9-6 2000 think it was, little more fine tune psc may do 39s air.Would need cold on the psc to go lower.....I'll post the screen up later
trying to get some more hypers as I only have two