cbjaust
-
Posts
646 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
6
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by cbjaust
-
-
With the screen shot required rule and the Validation for "top 20" scores, which top 20 scores is it referring to? Is in the top 20 in any hardware class or just the top 20 global scores?
Cheers
FWIW I prefer to have a screenshot and a validation for all my scores - some of early ones don't have screenies but I prefer to have the screen shot as well
Cheers
-
it's a 2D benchie;) so VGA details are not required;)
True, but I like my results to have all the information because then only the best score of each combination shows up in the summaries
Cheers
-
I'm trying to submit a new SuperPi result and I get the foolowing error, any ideas:
Crap. An error happened.
We could blame this on you but it's most likely our crappy coding skills. You could try again or nudge our developpers for fixing this.
Error message
org.apache.torque.TorqueException: com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlDataTruncation: Data truncation: Data too long for column 'name' at row 1
Error stack trace
org.apache.torque.util.BasePeer.throwTorqueException line 105
org.apache.torque.util.BasePeer.insertOrUpdateRecord line 680
org.apache.torque.util.BasePeer.doInsert line 562
org.hwbot.persistence.base.BaseImagePeer.doInsert line 238
org.hwbot.persistence.base.BaseImagePeer.doInsert line 605
org.hwbot.persistence.base.BaseImage.save line 8788
org.hwbot.persistence.base.BaseImage.save line 8752
org.hwbot.persistence.base.BaseImage.save line 8733
org.hwbot.web.actions.SubmitResultAction.run line 190
org.hwbot.web.actions.HwbotAction.execute line
-
if you unlock it, still submit the results under X3
So that means that any benchmark that is multi threaded will benefit from more cores.
an X3 720 with a good unlocked 4th core will smoke any 720 in its normal 3 core configuration in wPrime!
Cheers
-
Hi, with this score that has been locked for editing: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=723631
I'd like to add what video card is in the system: a GeForce 8800 GTS 640.
Cheers
-
Probably everytime I research results on the 'bot.
Cheers
-
Just wondering if there is an easy way to compare users in a similar fashion to the compare processors and videocards feature except it would only return results for hardware common to both users but also still have the option to compare your other available hardware. I hope I make sense.
Keep up the great work!
Cheers
-
I've noticed that sometimes it detects the number of cores correctly and sometimes it doesn't. It must be down to the operating system; in WinXP x64 it works right and detects both cores of my X2 Brisbane, in WinXP x86, Win7 x64 it doesn't find both cores and I just set it manually. The quickest way I find is to press "~" to get the console and type "ft 2" to set wPrime to two threads. "st 6" runs the 32M test, "st 11" runs the 1024M test and "gui" gets back to the normal interface.
Cheers
-
I voted none of the above. I think that hwbot should be the central repository for all benchmark scores and as such if somebody wants recognition they should post their score. Why would someone not post a score because that score is then ranked? Makes no sense to me.
I say leave it as it is and if a killer score is not on hwbot, then it shouldn't be recognised until it is on the bot.
my 2¢
Cheers
-
I ran each version 10 times on an underclocked Brisbane A62 X2 4800+
EDIT: Windows XP
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ @ 2167MHz [HT Link @ 812.5MHz (3 x 270.8)] G.Skill F2-8800CL5D-4GBPI. 4GB @ 270.8MHz (RAM divider set to DDR2 400) Abit Fatal1ty AN9 32X (nForce 590 SLI - C51XE-MCP55XE) Run wprime 1.43 wprime 1.53 wprime 1.55 wprime 2.00 beta6 1 37.375 39.172 38.577 38.828 2 37.468 38.921 38.593 38.859 3 37.468 38.750 38.609 38.781 4 37.390 39.000 38.609 38.859 5 37.546 38.641 38.702 38.844 6 37.421 38.828 38.562 38.891 7 37.281 39.000 38.625 38.781 8 37.531 39.000 38.609 39.000 9 37.312 38.813 38.593 38.906 10 37.672 38.625 38.609 38.921 mean 37.446 38.875 38.609 38.867 stdev 0.117023454 0.175161513 0.037490147 0.066392771
hope this helps!
-
Ticket ID: 38
Priority: Low
Hi, this page has all except one Thoroughbred spelt incorrectly.\r\n\r\nAlso is it possible to get differentiation between the Thoroughbred A (cpuid 680) and the Thoroughbred B (cpuid 681) because the TbredA\'s were much harder to overclock than the later TbredB\'s.\r\n\r\nCheers
-
OK, cool. it makes sense that it is the same for global points as it is for hardware points.
I wouldn't know for sure 'coz I only got me some hardware points!
Cheers
-
everything is running fine
global rank is only awarded once per benchmark per user; so if you have better scores in that benchmarks you can only get hardware points.
so if you get global points with a system and then get a better score with that same system the global point don't get recalculated for the newer better score?
Cheers
-
for the checksum verification, is it required for all results (post rule implementation) or just for top 20?
and what does top 20 mean, is it for top HOF global or top 20 HOF hardware or both?
I have seen some recently submitted results that don't have the checksum verification, should these be blocked? (yes the newer results did lower my ranking LOL)
Do all the rules have to be adhered to or can you just use a valid sceenshot and skip the online submission?:
eg wPrime 1024M rules:
* You must use the wPrime v1.55 version
* choose 1024M calculation
* have a valid screenshot (see example below): clearly show wPrime time, processor in CPU-Z, unless you submitted using the online submission function of wPrime
* use the online submission function of wPrime, with a valid checksum, for top 20 scores
Cheers
-
you can also save the results to submit later when you're back on normal cooling.
i had an invalid submission once where the bench was done with cool n quiet on but when i went to submit, i had turned cool n quiet off and it made an invalid checksum.
-
Cpu: AMD Athlon X2 6400+
(Idle: Core1/42° Core2/39°)
(Full Load: Core1/56° Core2/52°)
Motherboard: Asus M2N-SLI Deluxe
Memory: CORSAIR ValueSelect DDR2-RAM KIT 2048 MB, PC2-667 MHz (dual channel)
CORSAIR ValueSelect DDR2-RAM KIT 1024 MB, PC2-667 MHz (dual channel)
Room temperature...erm..i think between 20°-25°
i would check what your RAM is capable of...
Memtest86+, FTW!
PCMark05 + Windows 7 RC x64
in Benchmark software
Posted
Has anyone been able to get PCMark05 to give a score with the Aero interface on?
The 3D test don't run when the Aero interface is on for me. They run fine with the Windows 7 Basic theme but then the 2D Transparent windows score suffers a lot so while I can get a score with it the Basic theme load it scores poorly.
In the full aero mode the bench fails to run the 3D tests.
I get the same slow 2D transparent windows in Windows Server 2003 which is my other operating system. Hardware is Athlon 6000+ and Radeon 4870 1GB.
As an aside, my old GeForce 8800 GTS 640 does not have the slow 2D transparent windows test problem that the Radeon has and indeed I have not been able to better my 8800 GTS 640 PCMark05 score with the 4870. It's 8101 vs 7895 so far.
Anyone had similar issues or found a way to get it work properly?
Cheers