71proste

I was the one who reported your score but never called you cheater Score looks suspicious and I have reported as simple as that. I thought it was Post Processing Disabled but now I see that sm 2.0 GT2 score is too low. SM2.0 and SM3.0 are too close I hope you understand my reason

so, who can comment these high/unreal scores ? Jmke ? Massman ? Knopflerbruce ? guys please

That would be nice mate not sure if that's so cool but the rules are rules

Awesome ryba POland, Poland :E

I have reported few suspicious scores uploaded by the same user . 3Dmark01 single 8400 GS 256mb TOP 10 delly 31794 marks 690/550/1380 @ e8600/5.5Ghz nature 206fps/draghotic low 468fps/lobby low 545fps vs Johny Bravo 30325 901/602/2238 @ e8600/5.4Ghz nature 151fps/draghotic low 383fps/lobby low 381fps SAV 29144 900/560/2214 @ i7 920/4.6Ghz nature 146fps/draghotic low 367fps/lobby low 374fps My question : how is that possible that he scored 1.5-4k marks more than others using much less gpu/mem/shaders speed ? 3dmark03 same category delly 10716 690/550/1380 wings of fury 342fps vs 01001 10690 830/570/2100 wings of fury 290fps 12 10580 777/611/1554 wings of fury 299fps SAV 10539 900/555/2214 wings of fury 278fps I already know NeoForce opinion but I disagree and I would like to ask other moderators . I think these results should be take under consideration I might be wrong too 2003 category http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=2&numberOfVideocards=1&gpu=GeForce+8400+GS+%28G86%29+256+Mb+%28629%29&numberOfProcessors=0&cpu=&chipset=&manufacturer=&model=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1187&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=true&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints= 2001 category http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=1&numberOfVideocards=1&gpu=GeForce+8400+GS+%28G86%29+256+Mb+%28629%29&numberOfProcessors=0&cpu=&chipset=&manufacturer=&model=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1187&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=true&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=

MIP'ed 3dm06 is easy to detect Thank you for answering

lol say what ?

That's very bad, I didn't know that I have to report many scores from now

I have totally different question. I found many suspicious scores but.... Is it possible to upload scores using illegal software like MIP etc.end the ORB(futuremark)will still accepted ?

Ticket ID: 718 Priority: Low Hi.\r\nPlease add Radeon X1600 256 DDR3\r\n\r\nhttp://img697.imageshack.us/img697/3434/am3260.jpg

So, delete this thread Sorry for any inconvenience:rolleyes:

is the thread still linked ?

true same story with MIP...

cheers guys jmke : i am not sure how to do it

High Dynamic Range Lighting is a Post Processing effect, I think In 3DMark06 the post-processing is always on by default. People who disabled this future should be banned or their results removed !!!

Hi Is the ES chip allowed at Hwbot ? I know there was a discussion about that but can't find anything. Cheers

Ticket ID: 650 Priority: Medium Hi there.\r\nPlease add Geforce 8400(HP computer)\r\nHere is full specification:\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nthank you

forum cheers

good to know

also wrong category,checked by moderator,raported 2 weeks ago on the forum but nobody care about it Please move these scores to correct category which is 7300GT DDR3 instead of 7300GT DDR2 The score it's impossible for the clocks used pls look at the other scores http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=548232 and another one here: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=552063 even the description says Galaxy 7300GT DDR3

Ticket ID: 456 Priority: Low Hi.\r\nPlease add geforce 7300 SE 64mb DDR 32bit\r\n\r\ncheers

that's for Today are the subtests ok?

hmm I cant install vista or win 7 because of the size-it's limited to max 4x1gb it's the cheapest i-Ram I think edit: still no solution I have to install on different chipset and than reinstall the drivers on x58 edit2: i'm working on tiny vista,we'll see...

ok it seems I have bigger problem than I thought I forgot to say that I have installed xp on different motherboard asus p5nd-sli with no issues(like I said) it should works on rampage extreme 2 but I was wrong :9 is anyone here who has same i-ram on X58?

nope boot device priority-first boot device hard drive instead of cd-rom and than everything goes automatically i wasted 2 hours