Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by Antinomy

  1. There's been a bug back in the days when a P2 with disabled cache was identified as a Celly. This has led to fake categories like Celeron 350 (FSB100) and so on. This bug has been reported by me to Franck and CPU-Z got fixed (I had screenshots with fixed and non-fixed versions and can say when this happened, IIRC, around 2009). And Turrican deleted those fake categories. But some results remained erroneous. You can PM me with links, I'll throw them where they belong (P2 despite disabled cache).
  2. Guess I'm on fire these days. In order to run 3DMark99 on XP I've been using this well known patch: But since I'm lazy, I wanted to integrate it right in the installer so you get a patched benchmark from start. So this is 3DMark99 installer patched for XP, no other files needed. Enjoy. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fDjIUUfsIWsOZ1_-a0xs5dInId68zRJZ/view?usp=sharing I think @Leeghoofd could put it in HWBot storage and put a link on benchmark's page.
  3. Nice guide I just got pissed that we couldn't run enough tests on DG1, so here it is. I think it should be Sigh diver 🤣
  4. Very nice score! Didn't think 845 are able to do such clocks.
  5. Nice score! Try a 1GB stick running in sync, mem frequency is one of the keys.
  6. Hope to see you overclocking more than complaining about 11 year old results 😉 I remember you doing great back in the days.
  7. Added: https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/661fm3_v_ms_7103/
  8. Yeah, keeping PCI-E sync to FSB really helps for those 9x5 chipsets.
  9. https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/945plcap/
  10. nice mutant https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/p4_combo/ https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/se7230nh1lx/ https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/lv_674/ https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/p5gc_vm_pro/ Тот ещё Хуанань https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/koloe_x58/
  11. Not only mine. Your score is way out of line, about twice higher than most others. And given it's run at almost stock it looks like too high for such clocks. If it weren't a bug, you'd have crazy eff in 2001 too. And you'd have around 197 points in 03 with stock 133/400 FSB/MEM which seems unrealistic given all scores for SiS 651/661. Just my opinion, I think mods will sort this out.
  12. Very nice but looks like a bugged result. Common for 03 Wings subtest. Able to make a video of a >180 result?
  13. I've seen some great work over here. Found some old stuff on my hard drive. Hope this can bring some light on chipset and SIP, enjoy. NVIDIA.zip AMD.zip
  14. Wow! Outstanding score. Looks like IGP will be fun this year. Keep the great work!
  • Create New...