Antinomy
-
Posts
1987 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
53
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Antinomy
-
-
El Gappo, what's this about? Results population is going to be cut by age again? Global (like the previous attempt) or hardware too?
-
Well, they do have AM3/AM3+ stuff as I know. And there's definitely a 3770K (and Intel outcast among AMD guys)
-
Something like "Rev. 3 strikes back"?
Using oldware to get top10 - that's more than impressive.
-
The search submissions page http://www.hwbot.org/search/submissions lacks of "Any benchmark" option which was selected by default. Would be nice to get it back. Or even more - to get a "3D benchmarks", "2D benchmarks" options.
-
LOL, learn what QPB (quad pumped bus) is.Thats FSB 100, I am asking for the one with FSB 400Mhz.
Gallatin is Prestonia + L3 cache. L3 stands for Level 3. Both Prestonia and Gallatin have 512KB L2 because they're the same (except L3).No, 1MB L2 Cache is not Gallatin (Gallatin has 2MB of L2 Cache), its still Prestonia,Gallatin CPUs have from 1MB up to 4MB L3 cache. This is a dead end:
antinomy is right.I've been checking the Xeon categories for several weeks recently making reports and requesting results to be in the proper categories.
And don't post any ark.intel.com links - this resource is dead dumb and can't be trusted. I've reported errors since they day they've shut down the processorfinder.com (a wonderful resource) - and nothing. Even my friends from Intel couldn't help - no one is interested in fixing errors there.
-
http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_28ghz_fsb100/ - that's the one.
The 1MB L3 is Gallatin (Prestonia+L3 cache).
-
Totally with Mr.Scott on this one. It's all about fun. Love the old and rare too. I honor DT's opinion for realizing the situation while being
#1 of the Enthusiast League mainly by hitting the #1 spots in multithreaded benchmarks -
Thank you guys. I suggest mixed categories should receive only global/WR points. Otherwise it will give too much possibilities to cut the corners. In fact, using mixed configs to submit in non-standard global categories is already cutting the corners but a rather legal one.
Mr. Paco, I assume you to be the first who runs a system with 8 different CPUs?
-
A "mixed CPU configuration" checkbox on the submit page a manual selection of core count giving only global, and no h/w points should be a nice solution.
-
I think there should be an update to the rules regulating such a case. For GPUs the was a rule that "lower GPU+higher GPU = dual higher GPU". Meaning 4850+4870 = dual 4870. So that it does allow to get some points with two cards without making flaws in the system.
Maybe we should make "global points only" submissions so you can manually set the core count for mixed submissions but not give any hardware points for them.
-
-
You me tell me of red, yeah
-
Look who's in the daily top!
Nice one, Bones.
-
-
Ticket ID: 1709
Priority: Medium
This user\'s name appears wrong in rankings: http://www.hwbot.org/user/hannibal/\r\n\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/k6_2_570mhz/ - rename this to K6-2+, it\'s not a regular K6-2.
-
Epic fail achievement
-
Thank you, Karl!
-
LOL, I've seen these recently as I'm cleaning the Xeon categories.
-
-
Could you add GPU overclocking without requiring any support from EFI?
-
Ticket ID: 1707
Priority: Medium
1) Delete http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_24ghz_1mb_l3_fsb100/\r\n\r\n2) Create Xeon 3.0Ghz (Prestonia)
-
And Winchip 2B 200 CPU (no valid, it died)
-
Ticket ID: 1706
Priority: Medium
Abit ST6E: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2816199\r\nECS 945GZT-M: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2814542\r\nPC Partner AM-639BX: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2814543
-
Ticket ID: 1704
Priority: Medium
http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_mp_16ghz_foster_1mb_l3/\r\n\r\nMultithread categories look like empty on category page - both single socket or dual socket.\r\nBut if you open rankings and choose 2x core for wPrime 32/1024, PCMark 04/05 you\'ll see them.\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/benchmark/pcmark_2004/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_2472#start=0#interval=20#cores=2\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/benchmark/pcmark_2005/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_2472#start=0#interval=20#cores=2\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/benchmark/wprime_-_32m/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_2472#start=0#interval=20#cores=2\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/benchmark/wprime_-_1024m/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_2472#start=0#interval=20#cores=2\r\n\r\nAs if the core count for the category was wrong in one place and correct in another. If it\'s not clear enough, I can make screenshots.
Sergey13 - Core i7 4770K @ 5000MHz - 1229 marks XTU
in Result Discussions
Posted
Wow, look who's back!