Antinomy
-
Posts
1987 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
53
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Antinomy
-
-
-
Ticket ID: 1784
Priority: Medium
A-trend ATC-1020: http://valid.canardpc.com/2899796\r\nLucky star LS-54CE (VX): http://valid.canardpc.com/2897730\r\nThere does exist a LS-54CE on 430FX chipset\r\nPC Partner AM-430TX: http://valid.canardpc.com/2897437\r\nPC chips M570: http://valid.canardpc.com/2897732\r\nSpring circle ST 586 rev. 566: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2897731\r\nThere\'s a number of different ST 586 boards on different chipsets differed by revision so revision is important (bad move of the vendor).\r\nhttp://www.elhvb.com/mobokive/archive/Spring%20Circle/mainboard.htm\r\n\r\nZida 5DXP: http://valid.canardpc.com/2897435
-
Thank you, Karl!
-
Ticket ID: 1783
Priority: Medium
Please, add\r\nAcer JV50TR - http://valid.canardpc.com/2875336\r\nSony SVZ1311X9RX - http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2872559\r\nECS P4VXASD2+ - http://valid.canardpc.com/2875396\r\nGigabyte IPE1000MK - http://valid.canardpc.com/2875335\r\n\r\n\r\nAnd please, fix the name of this board: http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/tuscon_tc430hx/\r\nit\'s codename is \"Tucson\", not Tuscon
-
Fugger on HWBot? Now that's a surprise after all these years.
-
Thank you, Karl!
I've got some more to come.
-
Ticket ID: 1779
Priority: Medium
This link: http://hwbot.org/hardware/processors#key=intel_xeon\r\nshows Pentium 3 Xeon which should instead be available at:\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processors#key=intel_pentium_3\r\nWhile in Pentium 3 (http://hwbot.org/hardware/processors#key=intel_pentium_3) there are Pentium 2 Xeon which should be in http://hwbot.org/hardware/processors#key=intel_pentium_2\r\n\r\nThese three Xeon models:\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_3.0ghz_paxville/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_7020_2.66ghz_paxville/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_7030_2.8ghz_paxville/\r\nare in Pentium 3 family whereas they should be in Xeon family and Xeon subfamily.\r\n\r\nI assume, the subfamily properties for the corresponding family doesn\'t work for models in the subfamily. That\'s a pity for the programmers
\r\n\r\nSame goes for http://hwbot.org/hardware/processors#key=intel_pentium_1\r\nthe Pentium Pro models shouldn\'t be there.\r\nAnd as for http://hwbot.org/hardware/processors#key=intel_pentium_4\r\nall the socket 603/604 Xeons shouldn\'t be there. -
Excellent! Congratulations.
-
Hilarious! I did steal some of yours in the past. But you've stolen at least one of mine!
-
Thank you, that's the type of news I want typed bold and in as many places as possible.
-
Excellent, CherV!
-
Unfortunately, you've added a screenshot from another system configuration.
I've just noticed the result is two years old.
-
That's a problem - you can't upload the same valid twice.
-
You can re-upload the for submissions after a pause. And you'll have bothit will always go back to the highest CPU clock for the CPU, no matter the memory clock... Learned that the hard way.
Their dedupe systems looks only at the CPU. Learned the hard way after spending the whole evening making s370 ref clock results on ~10 boards and then trying to submit all of them. I've achieved 1 valid in result
-
Gigabyte's website running under Windows and using .NET. No wonder it crashed
-
Dreadlockyx, was an ultraHD resolution that necessary to post? Ever heard of resize?
-
Ouch, 1100 General HDD with only 3 SSD 64GB? Hard to believe.
-
Feature request:
Add hardware cups and medal icons to search results (gold/silver/bronze cup or medal):
-
It's TT Extreme spirit. Think Rasparthe was too lazy to fill up and it was auto-filled with Standard stock cooling.
-
Glad to see you back on track!
Maybe some energy for benchmarking, not only folding that you've been doing lately?
-
-
Oh. Well, I did get this one, O.K. stupid Gmail new interface.
Promotions, right.
-
Feature request:
Result's comment notification
Simple as it sounds - when someone comments your score, you get notified so the commenter doesn't have to wait months for a respond. Maybe make them like the achievement notification on the main page.
-
Have no idea - as you can see, this was done with 1.64. Try to write a letter to Franck. I thought 1.65 is the latest, didn't here about 1.65.1.
Aquamark3 Wrapper V2 BUG Thread
in HWBOT Aquamark³ Wrapper
Posted
Running on Intel+NV on Win8 the 2.27 Aqua. Test runs normally, but after that goes nothing - the result window doesn't appear, the process just eats resources without any actions.
Or should I wait for more? Say, half an hour?