Antinomy

There's another one - dump IE and get FF

LOL, don't use IE this bug has already been discussed. AndreVC if you have a stock cooler, you won't be able to go far. And you shouldn't increase the voltage on the CPU. If you make a S&M (stress test) run, you can see how far CPU temperature goes. I think it's pretty much even at 3.2GHz. Check it first. Run CPU-Z and check what's your memory setting now (the memory tab) and then - what it's labeled as (SPD tab).

You must've messed up his age with yours

The forum showed that today is Birthday of Hipro5 and Knopflerbruce (it's already 27th and 8 a.m. at my place). So I want to congratulate both guys, each is a great man! Hipro5 is a world-record and HW modification maniac. And Bruce is well known for his AMD K8/K10 addiction. Good day for you two and good luck!

Air overclock Insane CPU!

Ticket ID: 1126 Priority: High Please, raise the PM limit at least to 10K symbols. Almost none of my PM can fit in 5000 and I don\'t have another choice than flooding 2-3 PM at each iteration

Clock busters Or it's not an OC band?

Thank you!

In fact, all of them - Yonah, Merom and others. Interesting, bit Intel's site is confusing (as ark.intel.com usually is, to be honest) http://ark.intel.com/ProductCollection.aspx?familyID=43401&MarketSegment=MBL http://ark.intel.com/ProductCollection.aspx?familyID=3799&MarketSegment=MBL It claims some Yonah and Merom celerons as Celeron M and some - as Celeron Mobile. So I only suggested to group them by architecture (Core/Core2) and separate from Celeron M that were s479. Cause Intel is a mess up

You don't get the point. HWBot is not about competition (I hope nobody sees this ) it's about a hardware database. When you can look through results that others achieved and grab info from there. It's not about result moderating, but making browsing easier and more convenient.

Looks like you definitely aren't familiar with Jack Sparrow's words from Pirates of the Caribbean when he was "lending" a ship He went a bit more far in similar thoughts. And no, I think you don't (hey, you started talking about you, not me, OK?) understand the reasons. It's not about authority. It's about what people expect others to do and what those others do actually. And if it's up to my words I wasn't speaking of you personal. I don't want to make biting jokes cause you take it too close to your heart.

Ticket ID: 1122 Priority: Medium If you remember, some time ago the CPU-Z validation moved to Canard PC. So did the validation links.\r\nThe old links looked like this: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc?id=122261\r\nIf you look at it, it won\'t be available.\r\nBut if you make it \"show_oc\" to => \"show_oc.php\" then it works fine, like this:\r\nhttp://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=122261\r\n\r\nSo I suggest RB to run a replace script using this mask so that all links will be fine. They can be both in validation link and comments so if it\'s possible, replace all.\r\n\r\nThanks in advance

Some might think so. I don't - I prefer to ask whether it is so

That's only half of the answer

There should be an apostrophe in the last choice. "Where's" And the logo made me laugh, it's a great one! I'm afraid, my GF won't let me print it in A2 format over my bed

Yeah, it's always like that - about 3-4 messages from the accused and accuser and ten pages of posts made by yelling friends from each side So I agree about invisible threads if I understand it correctly.

Since the first reason to report is suspicion, sometimes you can't be 100% sure. So it's about one user claiming another cheating which is quite serious. If the reporter was wrong it gives bad reputation to both sides. Can you explain what does non-visible threads mean? The won't be visible to anyone except the reporter and moderators? And is this a "forget the old stuff and start from a blank page" or will you return to cases reported to you, RB and Maxi via PM and here: http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=1787 but left without any attention? Or is it about politics when someone is uncomfortable to be punished so the punishment shrinks to a silent clean-up? Thank you in advance I sincerely do not understand starting a new level in processing such cases without closing the old ones.

Yes it is. That's why I suggested to attach photos for CPUs that can't be verified by sure using software. The staff said that they won't accept this. Still, there is a way to add protection to CPU-Z. And we can work on it together right after I finish at least some of my projects

Well, that ones pretty easy to answer. The CPU string is set by BIOS. It sets a rating according to Quantispeed formula (if anyone remembers what it is). If you boot at high FSB speed, the BIOS will read and set rating according to the frequency. But you can boot at normal speed and overclock via Clockgen this will save the CPU string. And yet there are others ways saying short - the CPU string isn't a source for info, unfortunately.

Mr. Scott, that is not the full answer. There are ways to make CPU-Z detect some of the cheats with Socket A Though, there are more simple things to fix in CPU-Z that's why I'm working on them at the moment. And there is a way to tell a Sempron from a AthlonXP-M Just need to confirm it works in all cases and add it to CPU-Z

Thanks!

Massy, by feedback do you mean ideas on what it should be able to trace out? As I understand, the cheat-proofing feature list is closed from public? I'll give you some ideas soon.

chispy, it won't help to avoid cheating As for the database - you can fill in the MoBo line if you like in the results description.

Bruce, that's why http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1067426_

Very nice, Ananerbe! You always show impressive middle-end hardware fun