Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

ludek

Members
  • Posts

    458
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ludek

  1. The biggest problem is the power consumption while using a P4 Prescott. Above 1.6V and it can have a BSoD because of vDroop. If are you using a Northwood, there is also the vDroop, but is less-sensible. You can help to keep more stable voltages if you do the vDroop mod. If your Neo2-P has got the same ISL-6556x voltage regulator, you can do those vmods. I could help you also
  2. It will be very helpfull to get something like a WBX tune utility for this chipset. Memset can operate with i815, but it is not enough while squeezing platform to the edge of performance
  3. Hi, thanks I have some motherboards to add to a HWBOT database. And OK, no problem, I will change a mobo model, if Turrican would take care of this. BTW very nice motherboard. I don't like MSI, but this one is a great, nimble and agile mATX motherboard with a quiet good power section I do still have this mobo. Will check once more a full model.
  4. I was looking for Qxxx Intel processors, but no way to buy this. BTW I was wondering what is vNB mod doing. No difference in MHz, even while I set about 2.2V or more. The reason of poor frequencies ( < 230 MHz) on a i815 is that I had (we all had) a poor CPUs. So, this is another great Intel chipset, no doubt.
  5. Is this a ES processor? What vNB did you use? Should be 14x multiplier @default. Nice score.
  6. Best one was the 3804A294 with pcb code 3580207 6a1967. I did 416x9 MHz using 1,55V @AIR. Maybe vTT tuning will take a better results. The best values for VTT are 1,35-1,4V.
  7. What is the batch code of this cpu? Did you remove a IHS? Nice score
  8. Hi! please add some pictures of the Cascade You have a little bit slower score than me: http://hwbot.org/submission/2437803 Because of (maybe) non-tunned Windows XP (eg. BLUE style on), better ram tuning would give you better score. I was using a Patriot Micron D9JNM memories 2x1 GB.
  9. Great! Congrats! Are those mems based on TCCD or TCC5 ICs? (or maybe something else??). What bios ver?
  10. Very good idea! If you have a time, do the list of programs/tools. I am looking for a SuperPI compiled to windows 95/98. Will try to launch my 480 DX2 66 MHz and maybe a 386 processors, so it would be nice to see a SPI 1M score
  11. Thanks It does work perfectly! It is possible to change lots of chipset's registers and frequencies of ram controller and many many other settings. @Antinomy - I was looking for a NForce 1 overclocking tool, but no way to find. ClockGen can work with NF2, but no way to go with NF1. Any Socket7 or older tools will be usefull (eg. GA-5AX tune program) //EDIT: changed size to linked thumb
  12. // MOD-BREAK // Download here: http://downloads.hwbot.org/downloads/tools/WBX%20Tune%202.31.zip // ORIGINAL POST // Hi! I am looking for a Intel 440BX timing set utility. A well-known Memset program does not work with this chipset. I have few 440BX-based motherboards and my problem is that a A-Trend ATC motherboard have problems with stability while setting a 100 MHz FSB frequency. I think this is because of lowered timings (and crap bios for sure). I just want to change it and overclock it. I have also a few 440BX Abit motherboards with "good" frequency generator. Just need to change timings. I found something in a BP6.Com forum, but I can't have access because of registration system is turned off. If somebody have this program, plese upload it LINK to the forum: http://www.bp6.com/board/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=3666 Program name is: North Bridge Tune for 440BX
  13. Strange... My P4 631 can work with P5E3 Prem X48, Asus Commando P965, Asus P5K P35 and Formula X48. Try other bios/clean pin side of processor using alcohol/if you have done any vid mods, remove it. I can't say anything more
  14. I have a little brother of this Celeron: 3709A310 SL9KN 2L70604 7B0151 It has done 4,75 GHz @ 1.180 V @ SS cooling ;D Will try @ LN2. Great score anyway!
  15. Update: I tried to beat this 279 MHz, using SS cooling on chipset, but no way. FSB wall @280 MHz. here's a photo: http://www.abload.de/img/201307101375a8s1j.jpg Mods: http://www.abload.de/img/201307101374ghs8v.jpg It was on 10-07-2013. Found photos, so updated informations.
  16. And another beautiful score! I'm wondering what if you try this CPU on P5E64 WS evo. It has more efficient power section. You could also lap CPU (if you have not already done it). What vPLL are you using? If anyone else looking for older submission - 8505 MHz LINK: http://hwbot.org/submission/2354352
  17. Why did you use a chipset pot on Winbond chip (on 1st photo)? I don't understand this BTW nice score. I think, the highest frequency using P35.
  18. For example: Celeron 1.1A Tualatin SL5VQ done 1818 MHz. People done >2GHz on it... Next. Celeron 1.3 SL5VR done 2080 MHz. And Celeron 1.2 SL68P done 2005 MHz. Each one done poor frequency. Maybe I just need more tualatins to test. Maybe vTT mod could help. Will try those CPUs on CUSL2-C.
  19. Thanks I have tested Pentium 3 1.0 GHz SL5B3 with IHS, Batch 7117A588-0106 and I must say, it was worse. The best is SL52R, this one in this submission. . . BTW: I don't know, why my Tualatin Celerons are going not so good. Maybe I need other motherboard or self-made power section.
  20. Wow! I'm starting to think, that CUSL2 is better than TUSL2. Great Gigio! Keep OCing
  21. Thanks I have 3 pentium 3 1 GHz. This was SL52R, and I have SL5B3 with IHS on top. Will test this one soon. Maybe would be better.
  22. I think 2:3 multiplier is more stable than 1:1. I'm just starting "play" with PGA370 and SDRAM and slot 1 also. I will try 1:1 with 815EP.
  23. Hi! I think Intel 865G can do 400MHz. I will try it using SS cooling on NB and better CPU. Maybe VTT mod will be needed. It is possible to do vmods! If you still have this motherboard, I can tell you how. Just send me private message on http://forum.hwbot.org . Sorry for beating you I don't have backups EVER! It's good news for you
×
×
  • Create New...