chispy

Thanks Jmke , now its back again. chispy.

XS down again ,its been on and off line since last night . Its been down for a couple of hours now . Can you guys log in ?

Thank you , appreciate your fair judgment. I will provide the subtest window on all my future submisions. Again Thank you. chispy.

OMFG lol , no way. Thats a cheat or a bug , i knew it. Mod please check on this , i ran same clocks on the card , dual channel memory , cpu clocks and memory clocks a little higher as i cannot get that .5 on his 207.5clocks as he is using a 920 and i am using 965 unlocked but pretty damn closed to match his clocks. I ran it 3 times with 2 different LODs and with no LOD , this run its the average of the three withh LOD set for 03. 64088 WAY out of his score of 80694 ??? Not even close and i did 3 runs average 64000 more or less Round it up. Theres something on his GT1 and Nature that DOES NOT add up to a normal score with those clocks , hence theres the cheat . Whats going on with this 03 cheats A Normal 03 Run should score around this : NOT 80694 By chispy at 2009-04-29

Thanks for the tip , i will do something better , i will rerun with his exact same clocks and drivers , my OS fully tweaked for 03 so that we can compare and see wheres the bug or cheat . It cannot be that far away for the run i will do in a moment and i wil post here for comparison reosons , since i ran out of LN2 i canot recreate my run on LN2 today. 03 does not gives FM links anymore . 10 min. i will rerun his settings . BRB chispy.

Please mods verify and check this score http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=846930, compare that score with mine run at much much higher clocks on LN2 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=837110 , i suspect a 3DMark03 Bug done in purpose to give a higher score NOT online with everyone else score , something its not right. On his run he used dual channel , i did tried with dual channel and the scores were lower than the ones i posted for ranking , hence why i did run tri-channel and that was my best score even testing dual and tri-channel. That score cannot be done and not possible on those low clocks. Please identify the problem , bug or cheat.As we all know 03 its all GPU , i was running 900 core on LN2 . Thank you Mods. chispy.

+1 , well said bro i second that :celebration:

:celebration: Thanks bro , we will exchange settings for the 790i Boards and GTX 285 SLI as we have the same weapons . Im going to a big bench Party in New York in a few weeks.

Thats a lot of toys to play with , good luck Benji and have fun. chispy.

Its all fine here in Puerto Rico .

Thank you mods.

OMG another one using Phisycs X cheat , no cpu-z screenshoot neither or valid futuremark link , mods please verify this score against mine on LN2. cheated benchie score run with a c2d 8400 and GTX 285 on H2O - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=841370 My normal benchie score run with i7 965 and GTX 285 on LN2 - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=837121

, its not online anymore for me too.

XS its back up and running 100% with no data loss , finally its back online Thanks fugger.:ws: Enjoy it - http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/index.php

Please mods check this result against mine , another one using Phisycs X cheat , people need to learn how to follow rules , they still doing it My result on SLI GTX 285 in H2O volt moded cards with good clocks and i7 on SS - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=834279 This guy its on stock cooling air GTX 285 low clocks and i7 on H2O low clocks http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=840713 Thank you in advanced mods. chispy.

Phisycs X cheat used on this submission , please check this score done on a c2d dual core and GTX 285 on air. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=838527 Compared that with mine on LN2 GTX 285 @ 900/1405Mhz and i7 965 on LN2, thank you mods. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=837121

Its going to take a while guys , sit back have a drink and bench

Everybody its over at eva2000 (George) website http://i4memory.com/forums.php

Im having the first symptoms of XS Withdrawal I am checking myself in the Mental Health Clinic XS Rehab Program to help me go trhu this tuff times , i will advise you guys do the same in case of heavy withdrawal symptoms , The next session starts at 3:00PM eastern time By chispy at 2009-03-31

Thank you jmke im stuck at 1.26v and 900/1405Mhz on LN2 at -140c with napalmn and Cryptic volt mod form xs forum, i needed that to get me over 1000 core. Again thank you and Crotale :celebration:. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=837121 By chispy at 2009-03-30

As long as there are rules for submissions of PCMark05 and limits theres no need to canned the benchmark , in my opinion. chispy.

220 start up its the max as per hwbot rules , not futuremark guys , just to be clear on this subject . chispy.

Great to hear they raise it to 300mb , thanks for the info SF3D,so it is confirmed. I think thats good for the new hardware point of view , now that we know the cap limit lets have some benching fun again . Happy benching to everyone. chispy.

I would like to know if hwbot its even considering replacing PCMark05 with the more reliable and newer PCMark Vantage ? It would be a viable solution in my opinion and a good option to have another bench to play with. chispy.

I totally agree with you jabski , Now that i have seen and been thru that myself (go past 220 start up with my 8 SSds set up and a Adaptec 5805) , it was fun finding that sweet spot below 220 , for my it was 165 xp start up wich brought me a score over 23k). The problem its FM have NOT set the new cap in placed and the hwbot rules NEED to be rewritten as to what are the bounderies on HD xp start up , HD general usage and HD virus scan. It would be very nice to add PCMark Vantage and award points for it , far more reliable than PCMark05 and it was meant for new technology in mind. I hope for a good decision of hwbot on this matter. Good day guys. chispy.