-
Posts
1952 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
9
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by Sweet
-
I don't think so It's to late in Baires (Argentina), but not it's to late to make something better and more fair, Hwbot This great site, I'm sure you do not need this, or even mention it, but the change must be fair. Hardware sharing: big problem to solve, especially when it gets an unfair advantage to others, we should debate this without resentment or accusations. Not bad to tap only a few of the many bench's, with the same hard, within the same team, trying to avoid the many reports of hardware sharing air test a person, another person uses the same hard bench with Dice, this should not be hardware sharing, the same with ln2., But if on the same team, there are over two tests with the same hard, it could be, who are sharing, for example, there are over two tests with same hard with air, unless it could show videos of each bench, and photos of mother and Cpu. Limited to a maximum of two bench to score when the same CPU and the same mother. (same team, of course) Get less points when used micros ES , or nothing ? Team League : Why they are not three different competitions, Air, Dice and Ln2 ? proposing ways to demonstrate the Bench, videos, photos, screens, etc., By the mere fact of using three different types of refrigeration, gives us three different leagues. no? the three leagues should not be differentiated by individuals or teams, for example, Hipro, kingpin, and all teachers of Oc. including Massman you can win or lose to others in the Cat. air. But, following the example, I can lose with yours in Dice or Ln2 (that's true ) Each type of refrigeration used should obtain separate scores, each participant can, get used score for each refrigeration, again, for example, Air + Hwboints, Dice ++, Ln2 +++, rewarding effort and addition to the investment and dediaciĆ²n anyway, attempt to provide even minimally, what I think Please make an effort to understand, or write in Spanish or Italian:) Kind regards Sw
-
Latin America, the project was severely shaken, that is my thinking and that of many with whom I spoke. in this region of the world, money is not the most abundant. how little or much hard use buy it, like everyone here in the south, @Leeghoofd, what you say is true, well....in this part of the world, manufacturers do not send one sticker, We have raised in a old post. two years ago Thats is the right way..., I'm so sorry, but to me, and friends of the teams from Chile, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, Uruguay, Argentina, leaves us wondering if we continue in this. Sw P.S: in the forums Oc.of South, people are talking about all this proyect
-
VegetoN - Core i5 670 @ 4779.5MHz - 9sec 671ms wPrime 32m
Sweet replied to Warrior_oF_Byte's topic in Result Discussions
impressive Sw -
My 9550 score in 3DMark-01, was reported but it is the year 2007, before the new rules, What shall i do? Date sumit > 07-12-2007 Link > http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=673104 Regards Sw
-
9550 SE in 9550 - wrong cat. 64 bits vs 128 bits
Sweet replied to Sweet's topic in Submission & member moderation
Another wrong score (28-08-2009) 9550 128 bits in 9550SE 64bits http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=890423 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=890426 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=890427 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=884122 Please check this wrong video card Thx Sw -
9550 SE in 9550 - wrong cat. 64 bits vs 128 bits
Sweet replied to Sweet's topic in Submission & member moderation
please some comments, I wrong, maybe??? Sw -
Please check this , Gigabyte Ati 9550 in 9550 SE group, link spec of Gigabyte 9550 http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/Products/VGA/Products_Spec.aspx?ClassValue=VGA&ProductID=1221&ProductName=GV-R955256D I Think Wrong category, correct are this : http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/Radeon%209550 9550 SE is 64 bits and this 9550 /1050 128 bits, see this screen's please http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=884084 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=884119 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=884120 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=884122 and more of this guy Thank's Sw
-
Thank you xt0m, ...so this is correct score:) Yes 266 ram :D:D:D:D No, nope, not ....cpu-z's bug Sw
-
Well, in this screen thanks in advance
-
Thanks Hyperhorn and Freakezoit, again in google..... but got no trick to Aquamark, but I looking for....MMmmm maybe in 2011, I could find Thank you both
-
Thank you, very much, I wanted to try it Sw
-
Well, that is my doubt, there any way to run on Vista? Thx
-
bug I hope I lost several cups of gold and 50 points Sw
-
Score (06-12-2007) blocked Why ?????
Sweet replied to Sweet's topic in Submission & member moderation
Thank you jmke. Sw -
My score ( radeon 9550 SE) is blocked , this submit data December 6 of 2007, are block today, this score is 1.7 years ago !!! also no longer have this Video (she is dead, she sleep like an angel:D) Today (Rules) is in error of screen, but in December 2007 was not an error http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=672681 Many times, members of hwbot's crew, said : "...bench with more than 6 months old are not moderated...." Besides, look the other's bench's with this video, same date and correct bench's , all ok in resolution and the rest...was one of the best videos I've had Thank's Sw Ps: are many old AquaMark score's without Gpu-z, and cpu-z,and other old futuremark without resolution, this must also be blocked too ??? sorry google translate
-
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Sweet replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
Again In 3DMark'05 , same case as before. bot problem. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=861884 Please move to correct category Regards -
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Sweet replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
I'ts Ok. Imagine that the problem was Sw -
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Sweet replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
Same guy or team, 8600 GT DDR3 in 8600GT DDR2, now in 3DMark'05 (problem in forum PCAXE ???) Link: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=861191 Thx Sw -
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Sweet replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
Thank's both, jmke and Mostru. Sorry for missing link:o Sw -
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Sweet replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
Please re-check this wrong score in Pifast xeon w3520, the correct score is: 21.06 seg Scrren's: Thank you Sw -
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Sweet replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
Thank you both Sw