Sweet

My score ( radeon 9550 SE) is blocked , this submit data December 6 of 2007, are block today, this score is 1.7 years ago !!! also no longer have this Video (she is dead, she sleep like an angel:D) Today (Rules) is in error of screen, but in December 2007 was not an error http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=672681 Many times, members of hwbot's crew, said : "...bench with more than 6 months old are not moderated...." Besides, look the other's bench's with this video, same date and correct bench's , all ok in resolution and the rest...was one of the best videos I've had Thank's Sw Ps: are many old AquaMark score's without Gpu-z, and cpu-z,and other old futuremark without resolution, this must also be blocked too ??? sorry google translate

Again In 3DMark'05 , same case as before. bot problem. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=861884 Please move to correct category Regards

I'ts Ok. Imagine that the problem was Sw

Same guy or team, 8600 GT DDR3 in 8600GT DDR2, now in 3DMark'05 (problem in forum PCAXE ???) Link: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=861191 Thx Sw

Thank's both, jmke and Mostru. Sorry for missing link:o Sw

Please re-check this wrong score in Pifast xeon w3520, the correct score is: 21.06 seg Scrren's: Thank you Sw

Thank you both Sw

I report this score same days ago, and today I see validated this wrong VGA ( please see screen's.) But i think it was wrong, please re-check this bench Screen's : Link bench in hwbot: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=855956 Thank you Sw

was a mistake of mine, I doubt this was another bench.. this one : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=832398 Please Excuse me, this error Regards Sw

No doubt ,chispy, honesty is also the person who climbs a score, which must be real, and observing the rules and regulations hwbot. And now...in this bench, this guy used one WD VR 150 Gb or one acard 9010 with memories RAM ??? RamDisk soft ???? maybe ??? I think it validate in FM, may not be available at hwbot, it depends on the rules of Hwbot. ! I am not the most expert on the subject, hopefully some of the Mod regards Sw Ps: well, my spanish and Italian write, is better, I hope you understand my amazing english:p

X800 Gto2 All don't see resolution in 3DMark screen's, same nick, but this is wrong already reported, but so far has not been checked http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=796918 - No Resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=796915 - No Resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=796914 - No Resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=796912 - No Resolution And Something Old ..... X1050 in Radeon 9550 Including no resolution in some bench I made the report in May 2008, on time, with the bell, but has not been changed, for One Mod that it's wrong, not wrong for other, please check again. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697663 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=738346 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628666 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626713 Check this and.... Thank you Sw

:D, already solved, was not a tweak Sw

Check this submit http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=821109 Well 6600 Gt in PcMark Vantage that is impossible , but more IMPOSSIBLE is that score for single 9800GT Quad 6600 2.7Ghz Core Vga 745 Mhz Mem : 1082 Mhz This bench is 9800GT in SLI, is the only way to achieve this score with a 9800Gt Or this guy has the best Tweak of the history of OC::D Sw:eek:

And...one for me, you got my address:D Sw

I think this should be included in the standards or rules of Hwbot, to avoid confusion :ws: Like this and another http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=820735 Sw

Ok. As I wrote before, no problem see you later

Well jmke, Nowhere place, this score is delete ...besides this score it's OK...CPU Score 13800 with PyhsX OFF (with PhysX On Q6600 at 3850 Mhz Cpu +31000) ....see that screen... my new screen in new bench is equal;) No problem, bench always two or three times, but that score is correct, Did you see this CPU score??? , this is my daughter's CPU , but she is not at home Beyond that, jmke I want contact you, how can I do? ? regards my friend and Thx for the info Sw

Hi NeoForce the score CPU is 13800 PhysX is OFF..., with Phys X On score CPU in Q6600 is + 30000;) Anyway I re-bench and submit again one best score in this. Thank you for your quick answer Regards Sw

Today delete my score 8600GT DDR2 in PcMark Vantage... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=807114 Why delete this score...?? because this wrong, to delete it? Sw Ps.: Anyway, I bench again and submit new score (best score), please if something was wrong, in this, try to tell me that this wrong

Can´t report, the bell is grey !!!!Only a Mod can do that, besides I had reported at that time Thank's again jmke Sw

Very well done jmke, good job, thank you, thank you very much Please move this to correct category ... where they never should have been moved X1800Gto in X1800 XT 256 MB http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=740493 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=740503 X1050 in Radeon 9550 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697663 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=738346 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628666 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626713 All have been validated by mistake surely bad for a mod I look forward this arrangement, which is more than fair In Spanish: Muchas gracias jmke, tu trabajo fué excelente, espero ansioso las correciones, las cuales y seguramente fueron hechos por error por un Mod. Te agradezco en nombre de todo Argentina Overclocking OC Team y en el mío en especial Gracias Thank you so much, jmke Sw Ps. : Mod's Please be more careful in their actions, and avoid problems or damage to other

Has already spent more than 1 day, the facts are these Day after day, I remember this injustice, until it is resolved. RichardBastard , Massman... have read this???? Please someone: Move that x1800Gto to correct category...AGAIN..... is justice Fair Play....my friends, For all !!!! Sw Ps: Thanks jmke for your concern, you are the only one

without looking too much, for example /// 1050 in 9550 validate by a Mod See this, it is not surprising http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=738349 There is much more than that, we need to look more ..??? Move that x1800Gto to correct category...AGAIN..... is justice Fair Play....my friends, As for all !!!! Thank You, komadyret by your comment, Argentina overclocking Team appreciates your support And my friend Patagonian Thank you so much Sw

If you want to search all hwbot videos mod (pp. unlock, and flash bios), I do know that, whether, and I think most of 1500's bench, including bench Hipro's, Kingping, and other Important hwbot's overclocker What will they say when they change or delete the results? Move that x1800 Gto, again to correct category Fair Play...Please please we must stop the arrogance (some with power to move things) and the manipulation of results., That it's my feeling Sw Ps: Very recently been validated modeadas 9550 to 9600 XT, we also hurt ourselves and the team of Poland, it took a Mod opposite, and this is recent They want evidence of this action? Are needed? Narmer therefore, was severely damaged in points

Along with this though.... A microprocessor to overclock Intel E8500 is a 3.3 MHz E8600 .... then we must move from class? Or Many Radeos's , and another videos, unlock pp. (like X800 Gto or X 850 Pro...etc. etc.) by Flash bios, then we must move from class? Sw