-
Posts
1960 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
10
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by Sweet
-
Radeon X1800 GTO in Radeon X 1800 XT 256
Sweet replied to Sweet's topic in Submission & member moderation
jmke, to be like you say, will have to move or delete many, but many many...many.... in hwbot's bench's many Radeon's are flashed.. for unlock pp. Please think about this Thank you Sw -
Radeon X1800 GTO in Radeon X 1800 XT 256
Sweet replied to Sweet's topic in Submission & member moderation
Jmke, it is good that you told me, you know that you respect...(As always respect for all) But, any times, I have read in hwbot, it was the reverse, I can re-bench because I have the video, but others are not, this is anything but fair, such as desiciones have hurt me for the radeon 9550 I have just informed my team that I am thinking of retiring from this competition because there are things that do not understand very well, and is not a problem of language. Well, this is the team conversation Best regards, my friend Sw -
Radeon X1800 GTO in Radeon X 1800 XT 256
Sweet replied to Sweet's topic in Submission & member moderation
Like this ...Mome's 1800GTO, 16 pp. Mome's 1800 GTO in correct category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727343 And default clocks are 500/500 like 1800 GTO (flashed X1800 bios GTO to XT , unlock four 4 pp extras) When default clock's in 1800 XT are , 625/750 Well... anyway, Mome's VGA is X1800 GTO 8 pp. but he unlock four 4 PP....!!!!! He changed this VGA at 16 pp !!! (that is easy....flash bios, that 's all) You understand me ??? Please move to correct category , again..... Sw Ps: Sorry but, this card is clearly X1800 GTO... not X1800 XT -
Please check this: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=740493 and http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=740503 clearly see in the pictures X1800 GTO... not X1800 XT But in both cases was checked by a mod. I think that was a mistake or do not understand , or something new with Vga's x1800 ??? but we all know that there is nothing new with the old Vga's, bench's just that these are in the wrong category Thank you Sw
-
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Sweet replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
Narmer and I, believe that these RomanLV's bench's and g10 bench's are Radeon 9600 or Radeon 9600 Pro, based on cores or default or stock of this Vga's. RomanLV's answer: this We do not seek to harm anyone, only if you have a mistake, correct it Default 9550 have Core 250Mhz memo 200 Mhz Well, this bench's are: RomanLV Default Core=520 Mhz and memo= 351 Mhz !!! Overclock 776-388....It's too much http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=807783 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=807776 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=807792 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=807797 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=807799 g10: Default Core=398 Mhz - memo= 300 Mhz Overclock 698 -420 Mhz http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=809629 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=809630 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=809633 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=809634 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=809635 We think, that is too much, but the last word is yours Thank You Maxi and I hope understand my English, well ...my daughter helped a little Sw -
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Sweet replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
Maxi please, read the post 294...There is confusion between the VGA 9550, 9600 and 9600 XT Ati Radeon 9550 = Core 250, Memos 200 9600 and 9600XT are diferent and greater speed in default besides Gpu-z bug show sometimes 9550= core RV350 and another times show 9550=Core RV360 Narmer...Roman answer : Maybe , maybe not, but I do not decide that, besides I'm not speak English too, my dougther help for write in English Well, the question is : Vga 9550 - 9600 and 9600XT are the same or must be in one category ?????? I Think , we need the opinion of Hwbot crew in this Sw Ps: My father was Ukrainian (Odesa) like RomanLV, but I do not speak:o Well , explain everything in English for me is too much! (I need help of my doughter , she sleeping, 8.0 AM in Baires) , but here is the question. Ps: sorry but in English, all, you don't understand me Sw -
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Sweet replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
I think like you Narmer, but none of the staff has left hwbot your comment on this issue. I think they have not read I'm waiting for comments, opinions, something of hwbot crew In Spanish : Pienso como vos Narmer, pero nadie del staff de hawbot ha dejado su comentarios en este tema Creo que no lo han leĆdo Yo estoy esperando por sus comentarios, opiniones, algo de hwbot crew In Italian: Narmer penso come te, ma nessuno del personale ha lasciato hwbot il tuo commento su questo tema. Penso che non hanno letto Sono in attesa di commenti, pareri, qualcosa di equipaggio hwbot Ps: Well, if my English is not understood Regards Narmer Sw -
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Sweet replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
Narmer...Roman answer : Maybe , maybe not, but I do not decide that, besides I'm not speak English too, my dougther help for write in English Well, the question is : Vga 9550 - 9600 and 9600XT are the same or must be in one category ?????? I Think , we need the opinion of Hwbot crew in this Sw Ps: My father was Ukrainian (Odesa) like RomanLV, but I do not speak:o -
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Sweet replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
No, I think not delete, this result are valid, but moved to correct category Is what I say in my bad English, sorry, but you understand me... Well , my spanish is better bye guys Sw -
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Sweet replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
Yes NARMER , I Think this submit score was wrong RV 350 is for Radeon 9600, and RV 360 is for 9550 Core., I understand that, unless something is not known, or something new:rolleyes: All score of RomanLV is RV 350, not Rv 360. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=807783 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=807776 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=807792 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=807797 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=807799 In all the screen's reads core 350 Regards Sw -
One word...one wish Peace in the world, and happy 2009 , for all. Sw
-
Hellouuuuuu, Patagonian, jmke and Woomack something news about this ?, my DFI DK P45 KAPUT !!! go to RMA, no boot cod 88 chipset wrong:mad: ,had only 10 days of use in stock!, I continue with my old Abit P35 Regards my friends, and cheers for the next christmas and happy new year:) from Buenos Aires - Argentina. Well , a score of mine was erased, someone knows anything about this? x3100 in 3DMark'06, maybe something was wrong but I don't known what:confused: despite my difficulties (my new mobo kaput) , come new benchs Ohhhhh this one bench its wrong too, like mine ?? GMA X3100 in 3Dmark'06 not is GMAx3100 , is x3000 see the ORB http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=798218 and 3DMark'06 in PcMark'05, see the ORB http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=799067 Sw
-
3DMark'03 in 3DMark Vantage / wrong score
Sweet replied to Sweet's topic in Submission & member moderation
Thanks richba5tard and klopcha,:ws: (sorry for my sad english) regards Sw -
Please any Mod, can I fix this ??... was reported three times, the first on 11-11-2008 and so far still there. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=791079 the screen's are: Not only has been reported in the right way, but I have done in the post Validated score still wrong? Let us know here , but this complaint was ignored Plese see this Thank you Sweet
-
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Sweet replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
Please friends see this score 3Dmark'06 in 3DVantage , this wrong score has been reported three times,for diferent guys (first 11-11-2008) but so far there has been moderate. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=791079 thank's Sw -
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Sweet replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
Jmke my friend , please fix it, and this http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=774126 PcMark'05 with RamDisc software... and let you continue your holiday Holidays , are good... Sw -
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Sweet replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
Please check and delete these bad scores, , Wprime ver. 1.63 ( same guy...) Please remind him, using WPrime 1.55 This is mandatory WPrime 1024: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771790 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771756 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771737 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771724 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771717 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771684 Wprime 32: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771743 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771733 I report these, but so far, nothing Thank you and regards Sw -
hd 3200 graphics "unmatched"
Sweet replied to hardcoreo/cer's topic in Submission & member moderation
:ws: :ws: But holydays are good....very good.. next month for me :banana: Sw -
hd 3200 graphics "unmatched"
Sweet replied to hardcoreo/cer's topic in Submission & member moderation
:D I envy you !!! Sw -
Wrong Score http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=732643 3DMark'05's score in PCMark'05 Check and fix it, please
-
Wrong WPrime http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688298 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688524 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684574 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=704338 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701705 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731144 Checksum Invalid date 03-05-2008 No Cpu-z (CPU and Memory) only screen Wprime http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=725734 Please check it
-
Wrong Wprime http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707963 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693474 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700789 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696107 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696105 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693545 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699491 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699488 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=711240 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=711241 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685034 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685037 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729280 ver 1.61
-
Wrong Wprime http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727933 ver 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728015 ver. 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728641 wrong score, Wprime 1024 ,. post in Wprime 32
-
Wrong WPrime http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727298 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=712450 ver 1.58
-
Wrong WPrime (ver 1.55 mandatory after 1-1-2008) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693669 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699472 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697271 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697262 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691487 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688165 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726818 ver 1.54 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726819 ver 1.54 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726698 ver 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726699 ver 1.61