Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

richba5tard

Administrators
  • Posts

    6082
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    37

Everything posted by richba5tard

  1. As discussed here, what is the preferred way forward? I have a slight favor of simplifying, as it's less code to maintain and cooling can not be enforced anyway.
  2. Temperature can't be proven but neither can pro/sponsored, so..... novice league is nice imho, as you are competing with new members. There is less need when you have seasonal rankings though. Can I inline a poll for this or do I need to create a separate post?
  3. Well yes I'm not changing the rev8 proposal for each comment made. Without comp points: With comp points:
  4. @ozzie i didn't ban you from asking a question, i temp banned you for a few days to cool down after being inappropriate. I don't host this forum to get scowled at. I'm not going to spend any more time answering the same question over and over. @bigblock990 thanks for noticing, fixed. I find your suggestion very reasonable not to make competition points count for career rankings. All in favor?
  5. Hi ozzie, The reason has been posted multiple times in this topic. TLDR; it's too complex for me to maintain with the limited resources we have. 685.000 lines of code written in the span of 14 years is no joke to maintain. Not that rev8 suddenly makes this a walk in the park, but it's a move in the right direction. Both for me, as for new overclockers for which the concepts are overwhelming. The current rev8 proposal (first post) is not a drastic change from rev7. It (mostly) removes the oc-esports rankings - which no one cares about anyway, and introduces seasonal rankings which some like and some not. If you don't like it, don't watch it.
  6. One can argue if you did the 100m sprint in 8 sec last year, but did it in 9 sec this year, you are not better than someone who did it in 8.5 sec this year. I know the comparison does not fully make sense, but still a topic that can be discussed.
  7. I see your point. It would indeed only count if you break your previous record. To have this make more sense a seasonal league should also be restricted to recent (eg past 2/3 years) hardware.
  8. Yes, as in any sport! You are always comparing to those who participate in that season.
  9. It does count for his career though. It does not count for what he achieved this year. Seems ok to me.
  10. First page reflects UAT yes. I made a mistake, team rankings is already based on total amount of points made by members of all time. Seasonal ranking has no effect on TPP.
  11. Yeah I know but I need a simplified codebase in order to maintain it better. A codebase of 685.000 lines started in 2004 is no fun to maintain.
  12. Hmm, currently the team points = sum TPP + 1/10th of seasonal member points. Change it to 1/10th of career member points? Maybe makes more sense. I don't really care.
  13. How difficult is it to explain "this is what you achieved this year" and "this is what you achieved since the beginning"?
  14. Now that team power points are restored, would it be beneficial to use the same logic for country rankings? Power points of a country would take a computational toll, but it would be nice if both country and team rankings are based on same logic.
  15. UAT will be down for half an hour. I'm restoring a production copy of the db and team power points. - edit restore failed. I'll try it again tomorrow morning. - edit restore ok - first post edited to reflect rev8 state on uat
  16. You have been warned ozzie. I'm letting you cool down until Sunday.
  17. The TPP is a drain on resources and maintenance, but if the concept is loved I'd consider maintaining it. The big drawback(imho) is that it is quite static but so be it.
  18. What fundamental change to gl/wr do you suggest? Less benchmark which give points is ok by me, but a separate discussion.
  19. Warning, don’t pollute the topic with off topic rambling. Thanks.
  20. The only ranking I changed temporarily where the ones with screenshots above.
  21. The change has been reverted again, screenshots above show what the effect would have been.
  22. I did not change the labels, just the calculation of the rankings. Top 30 submissions, using total points:
  23. It's active on UAT. Member points = top 50 hw. Take a peek if you are interested because I'm reverting it later tonight.
×
×
  • Create New...