richba5tard

Sorry guys, the old forum was riddled with security holes, no patches available from the vendor any more and no way to migrate the attachments. : /

Topic locked due to violation of rule #6

I still see submissions coming in for those applications? These were made using the api this week: https://hwbot.org/submission/4071203_martin_white_y_cruncher___pi_25m_celeron_440_27sec_998ms https://hwbot.org/submission/4072094_avalanche_gpupi_for_cpu___100m_core_i9_9940x_4sec_252ms https://hwbot.org/submission/4071822_speedy22_hwbot_x265_benchmark___4k_core_i3_2120_1.814_fps Can you be more specific? I'm on a mac so I can test these apps myself.

Hi @_mat_ it just stopped working this Monday all of the sudden? The HWBOT engine built on production is from the 3rd of februari.

I updated the url pattern to (http|https)://www.3dmark.com/pcmv/[0-9]* For some odd reason some has set it to a bitly url??

As I don't have sufficient time to maintain the complex algorithm of hwbot rev6/7 and the rankings are too complex to explain: here is my suggestion for rev8. It's dubbed "classic" as it is as easy to explain as rev1/2/3. Submission points (mostly as is): benchmark as-is global points if score is 50% of WR, not top 75% hardware as-is More focus on medals, a bit less on points. Member points rankings: Career Ranking: Sum top 30 globals + top 60 hardware submissions all time Season Ranking, split into leagues: Sum top 15 globals + top 30 hardware submissions + top 10 competition entries made in current year, split into leagues Team points rankings: as-is team power points. As TPP includes 1/10th of the total points made by submissions linked to the team, there is a small impact from the global points change. Country points rankings: Sum member points current year Hardware / global masters rankings As is. Competitions: Top 10 entries of current year (seasonal ranking) and top 10 all time (career ranking) count for member points, no more oc-esports/road to pro/challenger points. Achievements: TBD, good concept but takes too much computational power? oc-esports.io Rankings scrapped, only to be used for read only view of schedule and the competition/stage pages. Thoughts?

The migration to invisionpb seems to have removed all javascript embedded in forum posts. Nothing left for me to fix.

Thanks all who reported issues in our github issue tracker!

The database sure is happy with rev8. The geek in me is satisfied.

Cast your vote here. Rev8 has gone live but no definite vote yet on what to do with competition points.

@k|ngp|n @FUGGER @coolaler OC Team @oppainter @maci @shamino @onepagebook ... By the way, a neat way to check for old record holders is to use the record history on a benchmark page: https://hwbot.org/benchmark/3dmark03/ If people delete there submissions it will not appear here, but I think most are still here.

Please pick which videocard benchmarks should be applicable for points according to you in 2019.

Make up your mind guys. Am I biased towards Yes or No? We can't even agree on how I am trying to influence the poll! IMHO it's ok to add competition points if a new member can catch up by being active in the competitions for 1 or 2 years. 5 or 10 seems to be fair.

Currently 2/3rd votes for some kind of inclusion of competition points, so the most sensible way forward would be to evaluate exactly how much points you should get for participating / winning in a competition.

FYI I made a separate github repo just for issue tracking, which is public so people can make issues without being part of COLARDYN IT. https://github.com/COLARDYNIT/hwbot-issues/issues

Do you have the same issue with https://uat.hwbot.org?

No issues with FF on Mac OSX. I'll need to check on my windows pc.

Well it was very bad and now it is less very bad. So yeah. 🧐

Leeghoofd reported the layout was way to wide, I have the same issue. Not solved yet. Edit: fixed

I'm preparing a fix for the profile, @nicegab edit: Profile fixed, team and country rank is no longer based on league, and worldwide rank is correct.

So many people using firefox. 😶

I even don't know how it exactly works. Which is probably not a surprise. 😃

Thats sucks @TASOS, cloudfront is the CDN network of Amazon AWS. They are responsible for getting the static data to you as fast as possible. Is it one specific request which is always slow, or all requests to cloudfront? I hope it's a temp issue for your edge location.

Both sides had arguments but none conclusive. Let us hold a poll to see what would be the best approach: Edit: posted it on the front page.

test