TAN YANG

兄弟，你的新头像很棒👀

Welcome to HWBOT! ☺️🫡

Huge thx for your sharing!🤤👍👍

That's my picture.1.45V 4.4GHz uncore testing.😗😂

I envy these CPUs.🤤🤤😫

I also think it's impossible, but considering the AIDA64 information in that person's screenshot - like data from multiple temperature sensors - combined with the comments made by "ground" below, I'm now semi-skeptical and feel there might be a sliver of possibility. If there truly exists an air-cooled i7-920 chip running at 1.28V 5GHz in this world, that would be nothing short of a miracle. Based on my experience, most first-gen Core i7 9xx series can only reach 5GHz between 1.45-1.65V. As for i7 8xx series, I haven't thoroughly researched them, but I've encountered a crappy i7-860 that could only manage 4.4GHz in wPrime even with 1.55V water cooling. Regardless, only time will tell about this legendary 1.28V air-cooled 5GHz i7-920.🫠

Yes, 1.4V vcore. In Windows XP, it overclocked to 4877MHz or 1.45V VTT 4400MHz uncore frequency and passed wPrime 32M. However, this CPU doesn't seem to be a good i7 920 — I stumbled upon a golden i7 920 on a forum that hits 5011MHz at just 1.28V (aircooling?!), which is nothing short of incredible.

Thx for your kindness😊

Fixed🤓

HWBOT should prioritize expanding its user base before enforcing additional rules. Without a thriving community, the regulations would serve no meaningful purpose. 3DMark submitting should be just like XTU submitting, why not?

I believe it is time for HWBOT to align with modern benchmarking practices, particularly regarding 3DMark integration. The current submission process imposes unnecessary burdens on users, such as requiring manual entry of hardware details (e.g., CPU-Z/GPU-Z screenshots) and redundant fields like "Idle/Ambient Temperature" or "Batch Nr." For instance, uploading a 3DMark score demands excessive manual data entry—a workflow that feels outdated in 2025. This complexity discourages new users: imagine losing progress due to a 2MB screenshot limit or an unchecked "Terms of Service" box triggering a page reset. The lack of adoption is evident. Take the RTX 5090 series: while 3DMark hosts thousands of submissions, HWBOT shows only three or four—mostly from hardware vendors for promotional purposes. If HWBOT aims to be a global hub for overclocking enthusiasts rather than a niche platform, streamlining processes is critical. HWBOT’s strength lies in being the only platform combining rigorous 2D/3D benchmarking with community-driven moderation, making it uniquely authoritative. However, its potential remains untapped due to accessibility barriers. To expand influence: Prioritize 3DMark user acquisition by adopting automated score imports (eliminating manual entry). Remove non-essential fields to simplify submissions. Leverage HWBOT’s credibility to publicly flag suspicious scores (e.g., implausible frequencies), enhancing trust and deterring fraud. Proactive adaptation—not restrictive policies—will drive growth. I urge the team to reconsider these improvements to secure HWBOT’s position as the definitive benchmark authority. （Translated by AI😉）

Add Onda MJP55(Onda P55) plz. https://valid.x86.fr/a12xxv

这是最早一批的Win10? 不错，比后期的好

智齿. Nice~

Maximum vcore is only 1.72V,,,😅😅😅