Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

I.nfraR.ed

Members
  • Posts

    2394
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    26

I.nfraR.ed last won the day on February 22

I.nfraR.ed had the most liked content!

1 Follower

Converted

  • Location
    Bulgaria

Converted

  • Occupation
    Web Developer

Converted

  • realname
    Ivan

Recent Profile Visitors

14301 profile views

I.nfraR.ed's Achievements

Collaborator

Collaborator (7/14)

  • Conversation Starter Rare
  • Reacting Well Rare
  • Dedicated Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • First Post Rare

Recent Badges

441

Reputation

  1. It's also possible with this one, but a 150 at a similar FSB in unganged mode would be an "easy" gold, yes. I was expecting to hit a bit over 6.1GHz which would have been enough for the current #1, but ran into different issues, so that's what I have for the moment. Would need another session to max it out and I also want to run 32M on XP where it does a bit higher FSB in unganged.
  2. I reckon higher is possible, just wasted too much LN2 fighting with the other board. If someone manages to run high FSB with Unganged mode it should be possible to beat it with a lower clock. A more efficient board could also make a change as this one is pretty slow in everything. Core-wise that's definitely not the limit of the CPU, the board is holding me back. I might try brute-forcing it with DDR2 board.
  3. Thanks. This board is very inefficient, but my Giga ud3 didn't work well on cold Hopefully I will have time to try again next month.
  4. I was using 130MHz PCIe clock on the DFI with that Sempron 145 some years ago. Not too confident it actually did anything, but the card can handle it no problem.
  5. What do you mean? PSU is a modern one, haven't hooked my 3.3V rail-modded one yet. VIO is 3.8 for these submissions.
  6. I have added it in version 1.31. All BIOSes have this voltage, it was just not displayed in older ZenTimings versions.
×
×
  • Create New...