rtsurfer
-
Posts
604 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by rtsurfer
-
-
-
-
Why am I tentative lol. I'm coming definitely. ?
-
-
-
Impressive work Shar..
-
Impressive stuff as always.
-
GL boys. I'm out this year.
- 2
- 1
-
22 hours ago, mllrkllr88 said:
GOOD WORK!!! 8G the proper hard way, no cheater AMD :D
Because its AMD's fault that their chips clock higher easily. ?
- 1
-
-
In for year 4. ?
- 1
-
15 hours ago, zeropluszero said:
is it?
For me it is
Previously the frontpage scores table content was overflowing off the page, so it was a giant PITA to use. Now the table is inline with the rest of the page and actually usable.Edit:- Seems as others noted, search is gone. But it was wonky anyways. Maybe they'll bring it back when its fixed.
- 1
-
The mobile site is a great improvement as well.
- 1
-
2T only works for bugbench, i mean GeekBench.
I wanted to test for 32m.
To eliminate variables, i tried keeping majority of the settings on Auto. Only settings not on Auto in mem tweaker was
12-12-28-1T tRFC = 240, tCWL =14, twrrd_sg ==> 25 twrrd_dg==> 21.
As suggested by Alex.
Also, tried tight profile on rest on the timings, still no luck getting it trained.
Since you mentioned 2T, it seems Apex X hits its limits around 4666Mhz divider for C14, cannot train higher than that even with Ln2 IMC. Gene or Dark might be required for more.
- 1
- 3
- 1
-
@Alex@ro Any suggestions to get past code 60, BA or the usual 49,55 on Apex X with A2 PCB? 4K works, 4133 doesnt train, on sticks doing 4200 on MOCF.
I did follow your instructions from above. Only works for 4K tho.
-
On 12/28/2018 at 9:52 PM, KaRtA said:
The bios in this thread has the issue.
The one on the Asus site has no problem with turboV. Just use it.
I see no point in this bios atm as no one has XP working it seems yet anyway.
XP works on bios posted in this thread.
- 1
-
Great improvement.
-
-
On 12/9/2018 at 6:47 PM, Fasttrack said:
Folks,
Might sound irrelevant, not sure though if it is...
Did anyone else notice that only 71 members have voted ?
Is that a 0.00001% of active members or less ?
Does the community have no interest in poles ?
Is the community tired of multiple changes and changes and changes ?
Is the community not interested in Global points ?
Whatever the reason (s), the sample voting is so small, that I wonder if this pole can be seriously taken into account.
This is an important point.
IMO, we have less votes because this poll isnt being advertised properly, I didnt even know it existed till I stumbled upon it in forums. Can @richba5tard please advertise the existence of this poll on the frontpage so we can get more people to chime in?
I have no issue with how the votes stand currently, but later on there's always someone who complains that they didnt get their opinion heard.?♀️- 1
-
Welcome back!!!
- 1
-
1 hour ago, Bulshooter said:
Both Bios 1704 are Crap, if there was a 8700K or a 9900K on the Board, Voltages are stupid.
As I understand, this is limited to profiles only though.? Seems a simple solution is to not use profiles.
- 1
-
-
Pleasure to see you back benching.
- 1
-
rsannino - Core i9 9900KF @ 7435MHz - 4min 6sec 292ms SuperPi - 32M
in Result Discussions
Posted