Massman

Okay, thanks for the feedback. Need to optimise browser compatibility

So translated in proper feedback, you're saying: - weight distribution of tpp rankings should be less steep (= more points for less competition) - reconsider balance between global tpp and hardware tpp Both seem worth considering .

Using Internet Explorer? Don't have the bug here with Firefox

http://hwbot.org/article/faq Question: When do you qualify as Pro and have to switch to that league? Answer: Currently, there is no clear outlining on who’s considered pro and who isn’t. Or even who should go into that separate league and who shouldn’t. Currently, I’m moving those people who work almost exclusively with sponsored hardware and only for pure marketing-related overclocking to that league as that’s what it was designed for. This is for instance KP, Hicookie or Elmor. I think for the first couple of weeks we’ll see who wants to join and how the flow works exactly (many or little overclockers making the jump, etc …). Except for the group mentioned earlier, we don’t intend to force people in either league. When discussing the design for the first time, we also got the question what to do with review samples. That is quite simple: we have no interest in either tracking all review samples or vetoing against sending a specific person specific hardware. What we asked vendors is to honor the Pro OC league by focussing the marketing-overclocking events (eg: sending super-binned hardware) as much as possible in that league and leave the hobbyist rankings as they are. We also explicitly said that there’s no problem with sending anyone a mainboard or a vga card. In your particular situation, this all boils down to: we do not have the slightest problem with you getting any samples or you choosing for the normal oc’er ranking. If you feel Pro and want to join, okay. If you feel Pro is a bit out of your reach at the moment, feel free to compete at the top of the non-pro ranking.

It's gone, because it should no longer be needed . Points are calculated on the fly, everytime you change your result.

Tell me what's on your mind! (no bug reports in this thread)

It worked perfectly on UAT test server. Merging to final public never ever goes smoothly ...

Temp fix: put '/' behind the URL.

it really is

Okay ... how to categorize this cpu?

1066, which is 1:4, no?

Not sure if 800 works, so it's 1:4 divider. I'll update the competition page.

Sounds good! 1500 was pretty much maxed out on my card, so I bagged and boxed the card already. Yours' retail or sample?

http://www.futuremark.com/download/pcmark04/ I'll upload it to our own server and change the download URL then.

More left in the card?

Whoah! Impressive mate!

Most records are ancient AMD K6 - 669 Turrican with K6-3 450mhz at 567.00 - 610 1BadMoJoe with K6-3+ 450mhz at 604.90 - 580 1BadMoJoe with K6-2+ 500mhz at 604.90 - 561 Turrican with K6-2 500mhz at 619.00 - 553 1BadMoJoe with K6-3+ 450mhz at 630.00 - 540 orange with K6-2 450mhz at 575.00 - 523 orange with K6-2 500mhz at 600.00 - 477 1BadMoJoe with K6-2 500mhz at 577.50 - 472 1BadMoJoe with K6-2 475mhz at 550.00 - 469 1BadMoJoe with K6-2 533mhz at 549.90 AMD K7 - 5345 BenchBrothers.de with Athlon XP-M 2600+ at 3208.90 - 4892 funkflix with Athlon XP-M 2600+ at 2789.00 - 4723 Lippokratis with Athlon MP 2800+ at 2124.00 - 4659 Aleslammer with Athlon XP 2700+ at 2638.00 - 4516 Exlua with Athlon XP-M 2600+ at 2770.60 - 4509 maxine with Athlon XP-M 3000+ at 2618.00 - 4509 Xevipiu with Athlon XP-M 2600+ at 2606.00 - 4488 Freakezoit with Athlon XP 3000+ at 2606.00 - 4469 BenchBrothers.de with Athlon XP-M 2500+ at 2806.00 - 4416 LostInSpace278 with Athlon XP-M 2600+ at 2676.00 AMD K8 - 10073 maverik-sg1 with Athlon 64 FX-60 at 3500.00 - 9925 maverik-sg1 with Athlon 64 FX-60 at 3480.00 - 9871 maverik-sg1 with Athlon 64 FX-60 at 3490.00 - 9864 maverik-sg1 with Athlon 64 FX-60 at 3450.00 - 9663 BeerKing with Athlon 64 5000+ X2 BE at 3529.00 - 9524 DAZEB with Athlon 64 5000+ X2 BE at 3410.00 - 9454 mtzki with Athlon 64 4400+ X2 Toledo at 3100.00 - 9427 koziro with Athlon 64 5000+ X2 BE at 3311.40 - 9346 sacha35 with Athlon 64 FX-60 at 3205.00 - 9342 topdog with Athlon 64 4050+ X2 Brisbane at 3244.00 AMD K10 - 14626 S_A_V with Phenom II X2 560 BE at 4212.00 - 12622 Vialet with Phenom II X2 555 BE at 4320.00 - 12056 Vialet with Phenom II X2 555 BE at 4340.00 - 12025 Vialet with Phenom II X2 555 BE at 4214.00 - 11572 PCTwin with Phenom II X4 970 BE at 4332.00 - 11273 S_A_V with Athlon II X3 435 at 3600.00 - 11007 DeRtoZz with Athlon X2 5200 at 3795.00 - 10453 Gunhead with Phenom II X4 940 at 3797.00 - 10206 MaToP with Athlon II X3 435 at 3922.60 - 9644 slagsmal with Athlon II X3 450 at 3989.00 AMD Vision - 5680 Christian Ney with Fusion E-350 at 2000.18

Will do!

As for applicable hardware, you can always check out our (old) hardware overview: http://hwbot.org/browseHardwareProcessors.do?cpuSubFamilyId=203 If we need to add hardware, just let us know!

Yeah, it's a tie. And in case of a tie, the highest stage wins = higher ranked.

Oh man! I'm so confused today!! OF COURSE!

SuicidePhoenix, SniperOZ and Redcobra win! GIGABYTE should contact you shortly (after computex probably).

Aha! Figured out the problem. Ranking should be final now. PCGH wins by having more #1 places than OC Forums (2 vs 1)!

Closing this thread. Release will follow soon and we'll open a new topic for Rev4 release bugs.

Increase 2D clocks?