tiborrr
-
Posts
545 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by tiborrr
-
-
Now that is a powerful run!
-
Nice, many results are already posted. Keep them coming and don't be (too much of a) sandbagger.
-
I ran out of dry ice yesterday evening, see the time stamp on my results.
I am very disappointed by your attitude, really, you say like it's my fault the software you have published does not come with the necessary installation files while the software doesn't says there are any missing files, needed for proper operation.
I wish this was tested more thoroughly before it was released. My benching time is very scarce these days, I have a full-time job and am away from home during the week. I plan even the simplest benching sessions weeks in advance and these sort of events just piss me off.
-
2.22 also does not save
Please add a button to save file manually (via Save as dialog).EDIT: I ran out of dry ice yesterday, I am kindly asking moderators to add my result manually in the database.
The setup is the same as here:
http://hwbot.org/submission/2354773_tiborrr_3dmark2001_se_geforce_fx_5900_xt_39037_marks
http://hwbot.org/submission/2354775_tiborrr_3dmark03_geforce_fx_5900_xt_10165_marks
http://hwbot.org/submission/2354777_tiborrr_3dmark05_geforce_fx_5900_xt_1928_marks
http://hwbot.org/submission/2354778_tiborrr_3dmark06_geforce_fx_5900_xt_614_marks
-
2.24 = same crap
I will ask mods to publish my result manually, i have a video of it. -
Same problem with 2.23 (i downloaded the file 2.23 but the version says 2.22), it doesn't want to save result. Perhaps the version from the link (http://www.tiny.cc/hwbotaqua) will work.
I am getting annoyed running this. I have 84k+ in AM3 but cannot save it and I am running low on dry ice after two days.
-
-
@Faust, Geniben, MikeCDM: Thanks, looks like Massbo was a little sloppy, 899.9FPS should be the correct number. But since the results are already posted 999.9FPS limit will remain. Thanks for understanding.
-
To all: Please do not use EIST/C1E/Speedstep as it skews the CPU-Z clock speed reading.
-
@Saint: No
@Raul SDT: Yes.
-
Okay, rules updated, competition page finished! BENCH ON!
-
Please refrain from posting results until HWBOT completes this competition website!
-
The official wallpaper + additional validation rule for 3DMark11 is missing, please stand by while Massman handles it
-
P.S.: Looking forward to your benching. I will purchase a 3850 this week and start preparing it
-
Yes, I am aware of that hence my deepest apology to my slavic brother Infrared
-
Sorry, i reported it, my bad, I didn't know 3DMark doesn't properly sum up subtest scores. I apologize for the inconvenience.
But re-run of CL cannot gain 4000 pts, that's 400 FPS
-
Excellent score. Just started to bench AGP, 5900XT is the first candidate, it's doing 630/1020 on watercooling (1.81V/3.4V) at the moment, will try dry ice. My platform is 2M-Wolfdale 6500K and 4CoreDual SATA2.
-
Alright! Keep it up!
-
Congrats to all participants, especially angloholic % billy!
-
You can check our video if you like.
-
Congrats Mat! Fantastic run by overclockers.at!
-
That's a nice FSB overclock! Any mods to the board?
-
Yes, the 12.8 seem very strong. With a better CPU (R.I.P. my 6.5GHz 3D 377k) 250-255k should be no sweat.
Also, the cards do ~ 1400MHz GPU each but not in CFX
-
The official EKWB "CPU Capped 3DMark – The old and the new" thread.
in HWBOT Competitions
Posted · Edited by tiborrr
Oh yeah, one more thing - GeForce GTX Titan is not allowed at any stage of the competition!
Also, in case two or more users will gain same number of total points then the user with best result in Stage 1 (3DMark2001SE) will be the declared the winner.