trodas

There: http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/radeon_9600_xt/ ...is a nice Radeon 9600 XT card w/o any image. So I picked one nice red one: Witch should represend the 9600 XT cards pretty well, right? Actually I got quite similar card and going to rework it for better So meanwhile, how about an image? :celebration:

Errrr, I figured out that this is mostly MY fault. The SuperPi 1M submission WILL always hang, when you do THIS: 0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 sec (there is missing the seconds label) and after the dot you enter for example "17.875" ... and then good luck with anything. HW bot will hang... But this is MY fault Obivously HWbot is no ready for some superfast processors that can do 1M SuperPi in 0 seconds and 17.875 ms or what the number is, lol. Dunno if this is HW bot fault or PEBKAC fault. You decide. It does work now, my 15.9sec SuperPi result is ON Hoooray. Took me like two hours...

Much better, thanks!

Still is not possible to submit any score.

Image on mainboard MSI PM8M3-V is very ughly stretched: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/pm8m3-v/ All other components are displayed pretty nicely. So... is there any way to redeem that bug? There is the original (nice) image: Thanks for considering!

Still HWbot hang on forever by using the "propopulate by previous submission" when adding score OR entering the HW by hand.

Still is impossible to submit any score. I give up on the "propopulate by previous submission" and entered the HW by hand. Still hang on the http://hwbot.org/submit/create page forever. Also seems that some scores vanished - most notably for me the Havli scores with FX 5600XT ... just when I wanted to overtake them (for example 3DMark 99 scored 26 661 points for me on X6800 CPU )

...and now it hang on the "create" link: http://hwbot.org/submit/create This is sad, since I wanted to submit some SuperPi 1M runs, while the fastest one is 15.953sec That is good deal less that current record here: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/775i65g/

I wanted to dd few SuperPi runs, but each time after clicking on "propopulate by previous submission" HWbot *COMPLETELY* hang and never recover despite many attempts. Example: http://hwbot.org/submit/create?previous=2863475 WTF, guys?

WC for women and wheelchairs

terrified cat on watter

Hoooray, thanks! Looking much better now I like it.

Okay, thanks!

There: http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/radeon_hd_3850_agp/ ...the allegedly fastest AGP graphic card is missing some cool, nice image. So I picked one: This should be a good representation of the HD 3850 card. Agreed?

Noproblemo, you guys are welcome. So to clarify - the number using the "watt" figure should be the TDP, right? (just so I know... yes, the flipside is, tat I could report more bugs when I know, but there should not be a big deal to fix some typos... I do typeerrors all the time, everytime)

CPU-Z bugfix / detection is in order, hehe

CPU-Z bugfix / detection is in order, hehe

So we have to wait. Nevermind. At least we know now, what is going on Thanks for the informations!

I just type cinebench and clicked on the suggestions. One of them is the page... that should not be there IMHO in first place. A bug, perhaps? Hopefully I did not do anything wrong, eg. to case the slow-downs we are experiecing now?

I just type cinebench and clicked on the suggestions. One of them is the page... that should not be there IMHO in first place. A bug, perhaps? Hopefully I did not do anything wrong, eg. to case the slow-downs we are esperiecing now?

Thanks, Christian Hopefully it will be cool - in the end result A serious setback happend - rams aren't performing how they should Since the target CPU is Core 2 Extreme X6800, I need fast DDR1 rams. For P4 a 200MHz is fine (800/4 = 200), but for 1066MHz CPU is need 266MHz rams to have FSB:rams into 1:1 for the maximum speed. Therefore I started searching for rams, that can do 266MHz. A user from germany showed that his Qimonda rams, using CE-5 chips can run at 265MHz getting 2.7V (Abit IC7-Max3 with intel 875 chipset): So he sold me these and when i used the very same ram sticks (see S/N) in ASRock 775i65G with intel 865G chipset at 2.75V, I get them fail at mere 216MHz, using the very same settings: ... Sure anyone can claim, that it was because my CPU cannot handle that overclock, right? Well... wrong. Even there is no Vcore increase, my CPU can handle 228MHz FSB ( http://valid.canardpc.com/hl1nhr ) somewhat stable for CPU-Z and benchable it can handle 220MHz: So to put it short, Qimonda rams fail at 216MHz, OCZ rams working at 220MHz. Hardly this could be because of the CPU ... or can it? Who can explain me, what just happend? Same mobo, same CPU, same settings... yet so dramatically different results?! What can be wrong? Could the ASRock somewhat address the rams SO bad, that they now fail at 216MHz, when they worked on Abit at 265MHz?! ...and no... I cannot use these OCZ rams for 266MHz, as they have top frequency about 231/232MHz with reasonable timings

Thanks a lot! It does look much better now: http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/radeon_9100/

Followed link from there: http://hwbot.org/benchmark/cinebench_11.5_/'>http://hwbot.org/benchmark/cinebench_11.5_/ (the download button) ...and get: http://hwbot.org/benchmark/cinebench_11.5_/maxon.net HTTP Status 404 - type Status report message description The requested resource is not available. So I quess that there is a little error out there PS. cinebench R15 works just fine: http://hwbot.org/benchmark/cinebench_-_r15/ ... and R11.5 there works as well: http://hwbot.org/benchmark/cinebench_-_r11.5/'>http://hwbot.org/benchmark/cinebench_-_r11.5/ ... So all in all - there should be some redirection from http://hwbot.org/benchmark/cinebench_11.5_/ to http://hwbot.org/benchmark/cinebench_-_r11.5/ page.

Guys, I have to report, that HWbot servers getting some bad spikes, where they did not react at all. For exampe, clicking when submitin score on the "previous submissions" then took like minute or minute and half to react. Same accessing some webpages... ...so just reporting that some hiccups seems to be happening

Yea, this old chunker R9100, basically rebranded (tough the PSB is usually a little bit different - and with many more caps stolen) Radeon 8500LE, deserve an image and that is the best I managed to find: (debarrelizer + saturation + sharpening used to get it into acceptable state) Pls add :ws: