trodas

think about sea turtles

Well, I don't know about this limit... really? ...but it still does not answer why there is not ONE score counted score on my achievements page towards the achievement: http://hwbot.org/user/trodas/#Achievements BTW, IIRC the different cards aren't required for 3DMark low scores... or at least it can be get around it by different underclocking scores

im shopaholic

Requesting fix of the Auqamark achievement As Turrican says: So one need to get 5 scores under 1000 points, witch is not that easy, but I made it: http://hwbot.org/submission/2468840_ (415 - ATI Rage Pro 128 -default) http://hwbot.org/submission/2468900_ (416 - ATI Rage Pro 128 -default) http://hwbot.org/submission/2469012_ (409 - ATI Rage Pro 128 98/116MHz) http://hwbot.org/submission/2469216_ (386 - ATI Rage Pro 128 68/82MHz) http://hwbot.org/submission/2469217_ (374 - ATI Rage Pro 128 57/68MHz) But still not one sigle score from all these are counted for the achievement ... And I waiting 215 days already for the fix of this broken achievement. No wonder only 6 guys have it ATM. Maybe more guys/gals will recieve it, when the bug is fixed...? So, please... fix! Thank you.

Hooray, it get fixed, thanks! UCbench score is now visible under the mainboard on what the test was made Hoooray! Even the long, long awaited 30BB score (Cinebench) is there now, and 4th place, hmmm, not bad! Thanks a lot for the fix! Hope never more these fails come...

Hmmm, you got a good point with the cross platform bench Okay, then, I can always uninstall it, I presume, w/o too harsh results I hope

Grrrr, vrrrrrr...! Not cool that XTU is limited for the Sandy Bridge and up CPU's. Talking about SuperPi, well, many of the SuperPi benches are screenshot verified only, so maybe should be XTU possible to submit with "just" screenshot too? After all, faking the heat and cores load won't be easy and there highest scores won't be achieved on pre-Sandy Bridges CPU's anyway, so it might should be possible to submit the score this way, when the Intel developers suxx balls so badly... I understand that they want us to get never and never CPU's, but sadly I'm lucky to get even my i5 750 Lynnfield. ... BTW, speaking about Prime tests... the HWbot prime in the Jar archive really need Java? I mean... Java is a plague of security holes and fails, so I cannot recomment anyone to install it... and I did not have it installed anyway. There is probably ATM no other way to get HWbot Prime working w/o Java, right?

I think that users should be allowed to vote, witch bug should have higher priority for fixing, because this bug is there for so so long time...

What the hell... aaaargh! Damn you, Intel software developers!

Thanks a lot, Turrican Now what poor soul to blame to get the ughly "sample image" over the nice image get off as a known bug? ))

Oh, lol. Claim WR then :-) WR by bug seems weird, but at least it will be fun ;-)

I don't dubt that Intel XTU bench seems to be the fastest way to determine stability of overclocked CPU. So far, so good. But when it come to submiting the scores to HWbot, then there is what I hit a wall. First, there is no obvious "SAVE" of the score. I hate benchmarks that require net connection, but when I connected the cables, then I got: ...that I must have more modern CPU to use the online submitting score! i5 750 Lynnfield did not seems to suffice, witch is kinda weird. Maybe because I disabled some of the CPU extras...? http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=108321 None of the settings looks like that it can be responsible: Intel EIST - IMHO off, because this is not NTB that need baterry support and I want always full clock Intel C-State - IMHO off, because conserving the energy is not the speed goal C State package limit Setting - IMHO off, because I did not want any regulations C1E Support - IMHO off, because sky is the limit and I don't want any other limits there OverSpeed Protection - IMHO off, even MSI recommend that for OC Execute Bit Support - I leaved this on, but speed wise off is better, no? Set Limit CPUID MaxVal to 3 - IMHO off, because who cares about old systems when overclocking, right? Intel Virtualization Tech - IMHO off for speed? Intel VT-d - IMHO off for speed? So then I focused on how to actually SAVE the score, because HWbot require the datafile. And I got "This profile is not eligible for upload.": ...when I trying to upload it. And when I try export it: "This profile is not eligible for export." ... This is insane. What I doing wrong, why Intel XTU does NOT want the score to be exported at all?!?! It is nothing Earthshaking, in fact, it just show the overheating problem:

LOL ... WTF went wrong with CPU-Z... or Photoshop used?

The board is known to HWbot: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/a8r32_mvp_deluxe/ ...yet there is no current picture of it. Please add this this one from Xbit labs website: http://www.ixbt.com/mainboard/asus/a8r32-mvp-deluxe/board.jpg Cropped and rotated version a bit to fix the original: Original: ...if someone tell me, to what size to resize the mainboard image(s), then I gladly do it, so they aren't scalled w/o proportions, witch looks ughly. PS. version sold in Czech republic not have these Sanyo SEPC polymers, but Fujitsu red polymers: http://content.hwigroup.net/images/products/xl/001277/asus_a8r32mvp_deluxe.jpg ...however there is the copyright logo that is hard to remove, so...

Thru different cultures, jokes does not get understand well. I could imagine, that the 5-0 term refer to some police or at least firefighters rapid response to threat, but that is just a quess. (google seems to confirm this, sadly the 5-0 is an police scanner app name, so getting to the bottom of what this actually means seems harder - most likely: 5-0 -> the police, cops, FBI what ever. the person who comes to bust you "oh shit its the 5-0" ) out for dinner

At least Aquamark install went absolutely smoothly on Win7 SP1 64bit Czech, as there was problems before with the localization... Good to see that this is a thing from the past and all it working nicely now! :ws:

Oh, that actually makes a little more sense then... Still, the fact, that submissions does not stick to the HW reported are the biggest problem there it is.

smoke by a gas pump

Wrong, wrong, wrong again. At the time I posted this, it show 10 G.Skill submissions, yet I have 16. Now it show 16, but I have another submissions there: http://hwbot.org/submission/2588149_ http://hwbot.org/submission/2588176_ http://hwbot.org/submission/2588185_ http://hwbot.org/submission/2588204_ http://hwbot.org/submission/2588211_ ...and if you can count, then the counter is 21. NOT 16 as HWbot falsely claims Sure - I OC the GFX card and add more, yes, but the counter is BROKEN.

routers difference

Oh, well... that card. That is probably going to be interesting piece of work. So skay, but his nick is nit Kingpin, heh

Making fun with HW? Good! What you used to print your name on the PCB? Make a template and spray over it with paint? Sure eVGA did not create card like that, lol.

todays thiefs

Maybe if the user should remove past configs from the list (eg. remove the duplicate ones), then there are not need to be any "load more". Because the problem simply is, that submiting like 16 or 20 scores on another machine let the whole list be overflowed by this one machine. Move to another and - you have to start looking for the pictures and typing the config back again. That suxx. Load more is IMHO most simple thing that could be done easily and quickly. Later we can implement any better method, true. I will still vouch for user to determine, witch past configs he want to have in the list. And list of about 30 machines should satisfy most (of course no all, but most for sure). Maybe just offering 30 pasts configs will help greatly right now...

Then forget the points, let just be added the HDD/GFX/memory and that it is Later we can talk about points.