Schnitzel_12000

That would'nt be very fair :-) ................... but very satisfying.

Nice clocks, but I'm wondering about your time. It seems to be a little bit slow for 2,97 Ghz.

Nice run. In the near Future I will try a little bit with the old ones and Dice or LN2. I hope there are one or two wich can go up to 3Ghz

11x244 is not possible for 32m and yes, I tweaked all I can. Waza also gives me nothing, I must get 2 mhz fsb lower to come trough . Im sad, if I tried out I hit 238 easyly wit three different CPU's, at the moment something closed at 230 and I don't now what. I will try a little bit tomorrow, pehaps i'll have a little surprise.

I tried both and there is a difference from 2 seconds. And that can be also the difference between two runs with the same settings.

Thanks. I do my very best but it seems it's not enough.

Powerd by Ghettochiller 2.0

Wow! I just found a chip wich run with 2750Mhz at 1,90V through 1m. I hoped to win this Stage with this one. I hoped.......

You are very, very close to me.

Thanks. It's on a fresh system with XP3 SP3 without any drivers. I Think there will be not many more possible with this frequency and this FSB. I tried also waza but I don't now why but it have no effect.

OK - I think we've still a little bit time till september.

Hy, I tried to submit a score with a Leadtek 6600GT. But I can't do cause the submission failed with the comment "Only use videocards manufacturered by 13." WTH means 13?

There will be a fight for some Marks at the lowest, realy at the lowest level. I wonder that there's so much of attention for this little card;) I Get the new CPU for my Asrock, therefore I bench all cards anyway. And who nows, perhaps there are some Points in the Cache.

So I will try to get the first place back with my new X6800 Extreme - soon. ;-)

Thanks. But it seems that i killed this little toy. next day I can't take a rerun - it closes at FSB 220.

Very nice.

Wow.

Wenn ich so auf eure sig schaue brauchst du die auch. :-)

Where do you want to go if you say you want more? Better than 1st ?;-)

OK.Sign, Off course,too But it's not me i'm talking about. Yes,but this is not the key . The key is that you get a different reward for one thing. Of course you get another (and better) reward for popular hardware,too. But it's human nature only to complain if you are worse dispositioned.

What I mean are the yesterday scores,not the ones from tomorrow.

That was more an rhetorical question.Its's clear that the reward is the same. But it's still a Problem for thr Airbencher. Perhaps an novice has no Watercooler? You say it,the difference is the reward. With the current system the winner takes it all. And this is a very big step in relation to rev.2. And the ones who benched after rules and awarding from rev.2 left out in the cold. On the other side you pushed popular Hardware to the sky. In my opinion this is an unfortunate balancing.

That's the point For the "skill" it don't matter you run a HD5890 under LN2 or for example a mx400 under air. In both ways you must go to the limit to get on the top and also you must spent a lot of time to get it. Of course,this is a problem. For the algorithms there is no difference between both. But how it can be handled to make a difference? I agree with that,there must be an attraction to fight for first But there is another point of view,too. Lippokratis for example has maked most of his points under the rules of Rev.2. It may be that Massman and his Team believe that rare Hardware must be degraded in rev.3. There were no Problem if this handled so fom the beginning. But the cut between both revs is to much for the ones who specialized to old and rare Hardware. It cant be,and this is the point, that someone loose half his points by changing the rules. Yeah, thats right. But there were in the past only a few competitors and imo this will not change in the future. Sorry for my english,but I think you now what I mean.

Normaly I do so by the newer screens. Three times CPU-Z and GPU-Z. So it's - we in Germany say - Wasserdicht

Thanks