SoF
-
Posts
1515 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by SoF
-
-
thanks for the detailed test!
that confirms me I bought the wrong card for benching ^^
-
Tesselation has different levels, so trying to spot a 'tuned' one would turn into a complete witchhunt.
You might find it weak, but for the people who have to moderate the results it's a big issue.
Totally right - imo there was no way for hwbot to ban "tesslation tweak" except inhuman workload...
...if you feel different, just spent 2500€ / month to hwbot to pay a "full-time-result-moderator"...they might think about it then.
"where there is a will, there is a way"
-
Happy Birthday!
@leeghoofd you recieved your gift I heard - c'mon show us the new poster above your bed already!
:D -
Awesome!
But that TRFC doesn't look sexy
-
oh rly
failing "down under"
-
After the "A0-fiasco" it is a legit point to speak about the ban of some certain ES that tend to yield way better MHZ than any other CPU.
On Ivy it might be "under testing" for now but if it shows to be the same - I am seriously thinking about ruling out certain ES steppings for points at all...
...at some point people should be "pro-enough" to enter their scores on unavailable hardware without points...
...just my 2 penny...
-
Break out your OC keys and EVBots for Vantage. high 6.x for GPU tests, low 6.x for CPU tests perhaps.
as soon as a 1155 board supports oc-key I am in - for now it only seems to be available on X79...
to re-activate RoG-connect is a more possible scenario for it
-
could have they artificially limited IB so that 24/7 users will have to buy SB instead? (and the issue "magically" disappears when SB stocks dry out)I've heard that Intel are reluctant to make SB-E look terrible.... which is what we all know full-speed Ivy WILL do...
3770K E0 ES = 3870K like one year later
980X A0 = 990X...
sounds plausible mythbusters
-
Yeah cards tend to go hot and spicy when squeezed in 3 and 4-way on air - often loosed some points myself in certain benches.
the vantage und UH DX11 looks very tasty anyway
good job! -
Nice, quick move!
Driver seems to be slow for old benches but looks good in new ones
-
-
So much teasing here
-
You just made a lot red guys cry
:D AWESOME WORK!
-
SoF it is without tweaks
uh yeah, we will have some fun with 32m I think
I hoped for something from ASUS with OC key on 1155 with Ivy-launch
It was awesome and maybe the most fun part of X79 benching... -
No, I don't have got what it takes.
+1 - I'm not UK
female-contest? -
Loop 6 needs to be sub 1min 17s
Can't wait anymore...still 4 weeks here aaaaargh...
-
nice - another part of oc gets more interesting again...RAM lists will get some updates soon
-
2k boost in 06 was noted single 580 @ stock on 2600k @ 4.6ghz. i dont see why we dont see more benchmarks with it to get a ball park of what it can do.
as for should it be allowed or disallowed? meh, disallow it. it degrades image quality (lod blah blah blah) but seriously, watch the screen sometime.
very interesting info!
it seems like benching will continue without MVP - it just keeps things more simple...it's already complicated enough.
@rbuass relax, I highly doubt a software from Lucid will ever make it into the world of overclocking...they will always fail after a look into how (good) it works...
-
do you know what Z-Culling is, fully rendered frames i think you are mistaken, as nvidia has already done away with such things. DUH
lol. but seriously its Z-Culling on a larger scale.Z-Culling only removes rendering objects which are covered by ANOTHER rendering object.
The primary object (e.g. a stone) will always be there, just maybe a butterfly behind that stone wouldn't be rendered anymore.
It is a very practical technique which only optimizes ("tweaks") the rendering process. thus way different from MVP imo.
@christian I know, you told me on cebit
-
Actually the graph should be like this:
F
|
|
|_________S
not
FPS
|
|
|
|__________S
because doing like you did its: FPSPS
You need to find the last mistake in everything, don't you?!
keep your "signature-collection" updated"
oh and here is my "the small-printed" safety-guard
PS: WHILE FPS ALWAYS STANDS FOR COMPLETELY / FULLY RENDERED FRAMES, WHICH INDICATES TRUE PERFORMANCE OF A GPU IN 3Dlove you anywayI can't live without you too
Yeah, the math is off. It's never funny when the math is off.I bet richie will agree
Maybe we can find a way to calculate total frames skipped, then we can add a new category and award WR's for most frames skipped per 3D bench.You don't wanna challenge me in skipping FPS with 03 blackscreen bug - maybe Andre has some backups in that category on very old hdd
-
What every overclocker, bencher and gamer is used to be...
What (lucid) marketing says...
What FM says...
What gamers expect...
What hwbot says...
What I (and est. 99.9% users currently) know actually...
What I speculate on hwbot...
PS: WHILE FPS ALWAYS STANDS FOR COMPLETELY / FULLY RENDERED FRAMES, WHICH INDICATES TRUE PERFORMANCE OF A GPU IN 3D
Insert opinion here:
regards
SoF
-
So it isn't - 1+0+1+1+0 for 5 frames,
it would be 1+0.2+0.6+0.5+0.1
interstesting - but I highly doubt it is that way because you can't simply split and "re-puzzle" an image that fast considering the boosts of mvp.
if that would be so easy mvp would work better on 2 dedicated gpus.
one GPU to render actual image, one to decide for the parts that don't need to be recalculated.
The way it makes things CPU-related in 03 gives me a headache to understand...
Currently there is one main issue to me: 1 card air + MVP = WR 03 = benchmark useless
-
let's hope there is just something hidden (like with internal pll overvoltage option on sb) in the new stepping that is intentended to prevent more crazy leaked scores.
you need to register online soon to unlock your cpu if things continue like these
-
...when you make sure massman sits comfortable
You know you benched too much when...
in Offtopic
Posted
If I ever buy a car for LN2 transportation - it will be something like that!