-
Posts
2689 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
20
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by flanker
-
-
looks, my 1.60 x64 and win7 working good and I want not change it until will be fixed
-
Hm...Im stay at 1.60x64....
-
wow, nice result! OS looks good tweaked , boot impressive :-D
-
-
only one RAM can u help a bit...I think, there is only big diference between batchs and pieces.
-
nice! Whats your FX batch? Can you see at it? Thank you.
-
Andre updated score and I killed today my next FX :-). Congratulation! Im really curious about this batch. Maybe some old 1135 series?
-
I tried it with only 2 cores, but dont heleped me. After I had no more time for benchmarking and to do tights timing, because dewar must have back. Maybe next time
-
-
7100? Nice!
-
the banik: the main problem is, no much people testing FX under LN2, this is real problem. If u seen Chews* FXs, most of these scaling good over 8 GHz in quick test. And it was not binned chip, after this he took one for LHe with "lucky" hand.
Example from my experience: I have 4 FX chip home. And there are differences. One is good for AIR with very good power consumption. But poor with LN2 (7300 MHz max). Second is 7700-7800 MHz chip. Died under LN2, at air was not special, average chip. Others two are 8150. One is average at AIR with "good" power consumption. Second is great AIR chip, but very hot and hungry. This chips still waiting for LN2, my estimate is second chip will be 8 GHz chip with LN2.
If I got support as some guys here, I can testing more FX chips with LN2. Ln2 is cheap here and is about 5km from my home
Really?! No problem whatsoever to believe it? I can give you at least 5 reasons why you should be slightly suspicious
Did u read all my text? If he show good run superpi at 8500 MHz, after is at least 8800 MHz validation possible. 8500 MHz superpi must be at least 10-10.5s (without much tweaking uncore, operating systems and bad skill). Tuned FX at 8 GHz has superpi1M about 10.6s
-
we will see for next proof, maybe he will try again in superpi, if superpi run will be about 10-10.5s at 8500 MHz, I have no problem believe 9 GHz validation.
Between FX are very big diferences, at air some can hit only 4500-4550 MHz stable, but there are few over 5000 MHz stable. The same with LN2, worst of these hit only 7000-7200 MHz, the best over 8500 MHz.
-
As I said before...try Superpi without APM control at example 8300 MHz with one module active. U must to get about 10-10.5s score limit.
-
new batch, good position at waffer, luck, this all aspects can be possible...We need Andre Yangs old good one chip. His FX hit "easily" over 8500 MHz, I believe for answer from him
-
only gold chip and a bit luck . I change this chip for my home, is it possible?
-
I really hope, this will be WR for validation...9 GHz is nice wall .
- 1
-
:-)
-
-
waiting, waiting, waiting...2800 MHz ready
-
32xx bios should work for ivy, but M4E B3 version only. pm me your email address if you want. Thanks
B2 revision is "dead" for BIOS updates?
-
It must be mistake...95W IB?
-
oh man, I want change your FX for some CPU...Your look very good! +150 MHz better with lower vcore!
-
Man, how good is 8140 compared to 8150?
-
of top 2D results, not OC....
The official PeeepCa's SuperPi country challenge - Aug 10, 2012 until Aug 17, 2012 thread.
in Challenges
Posted
nice idea, but now im busy with IB testing for review