Posted May 9, 201411 yr One of the moderator's (Christian Ney) has blocked/deleted one of my results. Specifically this result: http://hwbot.org/submission/2493048_yamaharacer19_ucbench_2011_core_2_p8400_(2.26ghz)_307.1_mpt_score Here's why they did that: "Make sure your Pwds. Checked are in ascending order, otherwise it is a bugged score." As you can see in my SS, my results window shows in ascending order, as well as the link to the results at the creator's website: http://anrieff.net/ucbench2011/viewitem.php?id=5524 I have looked through the rules of this benchmark and I never changed benchmark mode. All I changed was the thread count and instruction set. Please review my case and if you have questions, I'll be glad to answer them for you as well. Thanks.
May 9, 201411 yr Author So a score before this find can still be deleted? If so then you guys need to check every (and I mean EVERY) score and delete scores that don't follow the rules (ie no system pics or false cooling) stuff like that. Going by what GENiEBEN, my score is legit because came on an even number...#58 (58/2=14). Most people don't read the forums...only the rules to do the benchmark. If it's not written in the rules then you guys can't remove/delete a score because of something in a forum but not in the rules.
May 9, 201411 yr So a score before this find can still be deleted? If so then you guys need to check every (and I mean EVERY) score and delete scores that don't follow the rules (ie no system pics or false cooling) stuff like that. Going by what GENiEBEN, my score is legit because came on an even number...#58 (58/2=14). Most people don't read the forums...only the rules to do the benchmark. If it's not written in the rules then you guys can't remove/delete a score because of something in a forum but not in the rules. Relax bro. Everybody has some. Be active in the posted thread DD linked, maybe something will be done quicker.
May 10, 201411 yr Author I'm just saying that there were a few submissions that won't be deleted because (and I quote) "they were submitted before the rule change". That quote had to do with other cpu and gpu benchmarks alike. If that's the case then my score should not have been blocked/deleted! HWBOT needs to be more consistent with what scores they block/delete.
May 10, 201411 yr my score is legit because came on an even number...#58 (58/2=14). Why did you pick 58 out of ALL those threads before it, score was bugged starting with thread 5, and how did you even end up with 58/2=14 (29)
May 10, 201411 yr Author I guess I'll rerun the benchmark. Also, most (if not all) the submissions should be removed because of bugged runs.
May 10, 201411 yr I guess I'll rerun the benchmark. Also, most (if not all) the submissions should be removed because of bugged runs. Yeah mate plenty bugged results, even I have 170ish bugged ones.
May 10, 201411 yr Author Okay...so would this be a bugged run? I'm running this on my 2 core intel laptop and made sure none of my tc/cc=odd number.
May 10, 201411 yr Okay...so would this be a bugged run? I'm running this on my 2 core intel laptop and made sure none of my tc/cc=odd number. Yes. Bugged. Only way to not get a bugged run is to run at default settings.
May 10, 201411 yr Author How/why is it a bugged run? I ran the thread count divided by my core count (2) to equal an even number.
May 10, 201411 yr Because your Pwds.chked do not follow ascending order. All instruction sets were affected.
May 10, 201411 yr Author Okay, so could I run the thread count out of order to fix/make the pwds chked run in ascending order?
May 13, 201411 yr Okay, so could I run the thread count out of order to fix/make the pwds chked run in ascending order? Try running just one instruction set at a time, SSE2 should be the fastest for that chip. You can try my settings as well, http://hwbot.org/submission/2544557_genieben_ucbench_2011_core_2_p8400_(2.26ghz)_303.5_mpt_score
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.