Need Moderator's Help!!!

[yamahracer19]

One of the moderator's (Christian Ney) has blocked/deleted one of my results. Specifically this result: http://hwbot.org/submission/2493048_yamaharacer19_ucbench_2011_core_2_p8400_(2.26ghz)_307.1_mpt_score

Here's why they did that: "Make sure your Pwds. Checked are in ascending order, otherwise it is a bugged score." As you can see in my SS, my results window shows in ascending order, as well as the link to the results at the creator's website: http://anrieff.net/ucbench2011/viewitem.php?id=5524

I have looked through the rules of this benchmark and I never changed benchmark mode. All I changed was the thread count and instruction set. Please review my case and if you have questions, I'll be glad to answer them for you as well. Thanks.

[Don_Dan]

Take a look at this thread ( post #29 ).

[yamahracer19]

So a score before this find can still be deleted? If so then you guys need to check every (and I mean EVERY) score and delete scores that don't follow the rules (ie no system pics or false cooling) stuff like that. Going by what GENiEBEN, my score is legit because came on an even number...#58 (58/2=14). Most people don't read the forums...only the rules to do the benchmark. If it's not written in the rules then you guys can't remove/delete a score because of something in a forum but not in the rules.

[Mr.Scott]

So a score before this find can still be deleted? If so then you guys need to check every (and I mean EVERY) score and delete scores that don't follow the rules (ie no system pics or false cooling) stuff like that. Going by what GENiEBEN, my score is legit because came on an even number...#58 (58/2=14). Most people don't read the forums...only the rules to do the benchmark. If it's not written in the rules then you guys can't remove/delete a score because of something in a forum but not in the rules.

 

Relax bro. Everybody has some. Be active in the posted thread DD linked, maybe something will be done quicker.

[yamahracer19]

I'm just saying that there were a few submissions that won't be deleted because (and I quote) "they were submitted before the rule change". That quote had to do with other cpu and gpu benchmarks alike. If that's the case then my score should not have been blocked/deleted! HWBOT needs to be more consistent with what scores they block/delete.

[GENiEBEN]

my score is legit because came on an even number...#58 (58/2=14).

 

Why did you pick 58 out of ALL those threads before it, score was bugged starting with thread 5, and how did you even end up with 58/2=14 (29)

[yamahracer19]

Whoops! I was thinking 28 not 58. On my phone it looked like 28.

[yamahracer19]

I guess I'll rerun the benchmark. Also, most (if not all) the submissions should be removed because of bugged runs.

[GENiEBEN]

I guess I'll rerun the benchmark. Also, most (if not all) the submissions should be removed because of bugged runs.

 

Yeah mate plenty bugged results, even I have 170ish bugged ones.

[yamahracer19]

Okay...so would this be a bugged run? I'm running this on my 2 core intel laptop and made sure none of my tc/cc=odd number.

[Mr.Scott]

Okay...so would this be a bugged run? I'm running this on my 2 core intel laptop and made sure none of my tc/cc=odd number.

 

Yes. Bugged.

Only way to not get a bugged run is to run at default settings.

[yamahracer19]

How/why is it a bugged run? I ran the thread count divided by my core count (2) to equal an even number.

[Mr.Scott]

Because your Pwds.chked do not follow ascending order. All instruction sets were affected.

[yamahracer19]

Okay, so could I run the thread count out of order to fix/make the pwds chked run in ascending order?

[Mr.Scott]

You can try.

[GENiEBEN]

Okay, so could I run the thread count out of order to fix/make the pwds chked run in ascending order?

 

Try running just one instruction set at a time, SSE2 should be the fastest for that chip. You can try my settings as well, http://hwbot.org/submission/2544557_genieben_ucbench_2011_core_2_p8400_(2.26ghz)_303.5_mpt_score