AN7 OverClocker Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 I dont now why but someone deleted this result. The only reason that i can imagine is that the score has the same result with giorgos.th and exact same checksum(http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676961). Any other reason for complete remove? And its not the first time that happens. Quote
Massman Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 You and mortisboy bench together: don't upload two results. Quote
AN7 OverClocker Posted February 8, 2008 Author Posted February 8, 2008 this was my cpu. And the result goes to one account or the owner of cpu. mortisboy benched alone with his cpu bought it @ 4/2/2008 Get your damn translator or report before deleting http://www.thelab.gr/showthread.php?postid=672685#post672685 and unblock my score immediately and any other scores you blocked. Quote
Guest GoriLLakoS Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 (edited) Baaaaaaaaah.... Relax AN7...relax man..don't getiing crazy so easy... Masman, An7 has one cpu and mortisboy has another.. ________ Extreme Vaporizer Edited April 2, 2011 by GoriLLakoS Quote
klopcha Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 Make a photo as this http://www.topmods.net/nord/2xe6850-team!!!+.jpg And will not be problems. Quote
mortisboy Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 ...HEY AN7... GoriLLakoS is right...cool man ...guys they are two different cpu with the same step..here are some pictures....unfortunately now the cpu is on the mobo at cascade when it's out for my new QX9650 i will post more photos Quote
Massman Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 "AN7 + Mortisboy" Kinda suspicious, no? Quote
AN7 OverClocker Posted February 11, 2008 Author Posted February 11, 2008 You think that we are so foolish to write down that we benched together an then upload both of us results with the same cpu??? Here you are. You re wellcome Quote
Massman Posted February 11, 2008 Posted February 11, 2008 I'll unblock the score. By the way, to make this easier, just give credit to Mortisboy in the description field of the score instead of in the screenshot. Makes our lives a bit easier. Quote
AN7 OverClocker Posted February 11, 2008 Author Posted February 11, 2008 Your and our lives would by much easier if many thinks were different. Quote
Massman Posted February 23, 2008 Posted February 23, 2008 Because of the performance product that is below 44k. I need more info in order to put it back up, as it's by far the most efficient run out there. Quote
knopflerbruce Posted February 24, 2008 Posted February 24, 2008 Because of the performance product that is below 44k. I need more info in order to put it back up, as it's by far the most efficient run out there. Is it really that far away from the rest? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696845 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691995 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700573 Quote
JMKS Posted February 24, 2008 Posted February 24, 2008 Is it really that far away from the rest? Yes, 2% [clock for clock] in 1M is a HUGE difference. With x8 and sky-high FSB it might be possible of course, but as it is the best performance per clock ever [or maybe I am missing something] it may require a little explanation . Quote
demiurg Posted February 25, 2008 Posted February 25, 2008 It`s all about very high FSB and great MEM frequency Quote
JMKS Posted February 25, 2008 Posted February 25, 2008 There should be absolutely no problem if You can do a video [it was You who mentioned a video so a think it is not a big problem] of a run with same settings [multiplier, mem divider, timings, subtimings, etc] but FSB for example 500 [or higher, but I think there is no reason to require pushing that high again], with very similar clock*MHz result . Quote
Massman Posted February 26, 2008 Posted February 26, 2008 A video record would be enough? I'd prefer an explanation of the tweaks used via PM . Is it really that far away from the rest? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696845 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691995 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700573 Yes. This score has a performance product of 43.981, while the average PP is around 46.5k. Insanely tweaked systems with a 1M tuned board (which is not likely to get high in fsb) can get close to or even a bit lower than 45k. Quote
AN7 OverClocker Posted February 26, 2008 Author Posted February 26, 2008 Just received this mail. Hello, An hwbot crew member, demiurg, has blocked one of your submitted scores. It has been marked as 'incorrect submission'. This was the reason the user gave: Please be more careful with submission You can view your result here: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572852 You can find out more about the reporting user here: http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=5330 Yours sincerely, the hwbot.org team If you no longer want to recieve reports of your results, please modify your profile: http://www.hwbot.org/profile.account.do But i dont even remember the score. If sth was wrong it is so hard to leave it for a while as reported so i ll be able to correct it? And the reason"Please be more careful with submission" doesent tell me anything.Maybe it doesn't have cpu-z.I really dont remember What was the problem? Thanx Quote
Crew NeoForce Posted February 27, 2008 Crew Posted February 27, 2008 (edited) Fixed. You have different score on screen and in result. I`ve edited them. Good luck! ________ YOU FUCK TUBE Edited May 13, 2011 by NeoForce Quote
AN7 OverClocker Posted February 28, 2008 Author Posted February 28, 2008 Holy shi(f)t. Thanx man and sorry for the mess Quote
Guest cpec Posted February 29, 2008 Posted February 29, 2008 Why has my 7900GS 3DMark06 score been deleted? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699557 The e-mail says 'incorrect submission', but I dont see why... Quote
Guest cpec Posted February 29, 2008 Posted February 29, 2008 You can click the "entry modification log" (book icon) to see comments why the result was blocked. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699557 Actually, there is not such a button or something. Just a noteblock icon, together with the text "No article has been written about this subject". I saw that my score was posted in the 'wrong result' topic. The poster claims that my SM3.0 score is too high for my clocks. But now look at another of my result with the same 7900GS, but with a E6300 instead of a X3210: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=4126124 You'll see that the vga clocks are a bit higher, and so are the SM scores. Now imagine that you replace the E6300 with a X3210, and the vga clocks are a bit lower. Is it weird that the SM scores are a bit lower, but because the CPU score is way higher, the total score is better? Quote
Crew NeoForce Posted February 29, 2008 Crew Posted February 29, 2008 (edited) Your score was blocked - because 1. Basic version of 06 mark doesn`t show score. 2. Score on main mark window and opened result differs. Please provide ORB link to resolve situation ________ UTG HEAVY DUTY WEB BELT Edited May 13, 2011 by NeoForce Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.