Barton Posted January 7, 2011 Share Posted January 7, 2011 Here's another one where the database for listings 1-20 is messed up. It has duplicate entries by listed in two or more places for 1-20. Please look at the first two (2) pages of entries very carefully. If you do the problem should be obvious. It is the same type of problem encountered before. Let me know if you see the problem. If not I'll try to explain it more clearly. http://www.hwbot.org/rankings/benchmark/superpi/rankings?start=9&hardwareTypeId=CPU_710 .. For example, look for my time. Note that it is not on page one, but only on page two. Shouldn't it be on page one? 27.078 secs for Super Pi 1M. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted January 7, 2011 Share Posted January 7, 2011 It's on one and two (#19 and #31). I think it's because there's no zero in the .xxx part of the time and the DB can't decide where it goes. You need to start putting all three numbers in buddy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barton Posted January 7, 2011 Author Share Posted January 7, 2011 It's on one and two (#19 and #31). I think it's because there's no zero in the .xxx part of the time and the DB can't decide where it goes. You need to start putting all three numbers in buddy. I believe the submission was for 27.078 sec. That's the correct score and how I recall submitting it. That is, I did submit it with the zero to start with. The bot seems to drop those. When I originally looked at the two pages, it was only on the second page and not on the first one. It also appeared that there were duplicate entries on pages one and two. Not just my score, but others. Time to go back and check that. Yep, that's still the case. Please compare ALL the entries on pages one and two. Not just mine. See who is #12 and 21 for example... There could be others, too. Something doesn't look right to me. Do you see it or is it just me? http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/opteron_144_90nm?tab=2drankings#/manufacturer.rankings.do?applicationId=3&manufacturer=amd&hardwareTypeId=CPU_710&hardwareType=CPU&tabid=cpubenchmarks'>http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/opteron_144_90nm?tab=2drankings#/manufacturer.rankings.do?applicationId=3&manufacturer=amd&hardwareTypeId=CPU_710&hardwareType=CPU&tabid=cpubenchmarks Compare with: http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/opteron_144_90nm?tab=2drankings#/manufacturer.rankings.do?applicationId=3&manufacturer=amd&hardwareTypeId=CPU_710&hardwareType=CPU&tabid=cpubenchmarks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted January 7, 2011 Share Posted January 7, 2011 Something doesn't look right to me. Do you see it or is it just me? http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/proces...=cpubenchmarks Compare with: http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/proces...=cpubenchmarks Both links are identical to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barton Posted January 8, 2011 Author Share Posted January 8, 2011 One should have been to 1-20 and the other to 21-40 of the Super Pi rankings. Try this. Go to the Super Pi 1M ranking page manually. Then, ... Take a look at #12 and then go to the next page and look at #21. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barton Posted January 8, 2011 Author Share Posted January 8, 2011 Would one of the mods check this please? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 I've seen some similar fuckups before. Unfortunately I can't change this, only massman can (hopefully ). Your score gets the correct amount of boints, though Just so you don't worry about that part Maybe the engine counts soft deleted and/or non-best scores belonging to users with better scores when you look at any other page than top 20? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.