M.Beier Posted November 13, 2009 Posted November 13, 2009 (edited) EDIT: Compare URL: http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=899805 http://hwbot.org/result.history.do?resultId=899805 This result has been approved by NeoForce today... I reported it last night, thing is I believe Im no#1 on aircooled setup in 2003.... I was wondering about that result for some days, because I dont believe AMD hits as high CPC as P55.... So, I tested it,,,, My results were less then 100K with 4ghz sharp on my 965C3 using one card at stock clocks, using two it was rather 116-117K, bare in mind; quite decent tweaked OS. Now why did I report that result.. Its photoshopped, using a X2 card you will get "Enabled (2 GPUs), Sideport Off", notice how its listed as "Disabled", I suggested that this is because the REAL text was "Enabled (4 GPUs), Sideport Off",.... I think when cheating in such aggressive way, a permban from the bot is in order.... I showed Massman the result on 11-11-09, but at that point I hadnt figured the bug/cheat, I just noticed last night and reported :-) .... NeoForce, I dont understand how you can approve the result when I have given this explaination in the report... Edited November 13, 2009 by M.Beier Quote
Massman Posted November 13, 2009 Posted November 13, 2009 A nature subtest score of 870-ish indicates multi-card 4870X2 setup. Quote
M.Beier Posted November 13, 2009 Author Posted November 13, 2009 the score you linked was not reported by anyone... http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=899805 it was never reported? Must have been a bug, I did report it, however it asked me to sign in, so I did But I thought it went through, seeing it became valid today, its not a new result. Anyhow; Glad that its none approved no more, I think the user needs to explain his actions, or why its "valid", a decent chance, yet if equinox fails doing so, I do believe he deserves a permban... So; He has 2x 2003, one with CFX which is clearly higher? Yes: 1) the 113 result is with CFX 2) The 123? result is with CFX at 80x/100x mhz and NONE WHQL driver, besides, I was using 20x200 4ghz, 800mhz crap timings (fast test) and got 116-117K, the 123K score is highly possible, especially with 42xxmhz.... My gain from 3ghz to 4ghz was 9k I recall. Quote
Crew NeoForce Posted November 13, 2009 Crew Posted November 13, 2009 I saw result is repoted - but no explanation like jmke shows log. And I see valid ORB link - so.. Now knowing the story - for sure we need explanation Quote
M.Beier Posted November 15, 2009 Author Posted November 15, 2009 Sorry about my harsh way NeoForce, hope I havent offended you... Im on very unstable internet, it probably just crashed, however, here it stated it went through.... I thought someone had removed my report, took me quite some time to spot the simple sign :-) I will use this section a bit more in future, and give Massman a bit rest on messenger (Dont get too excited PJP, I will still talk about women :-P) EDIT: Oh and he wont get rest untill he fixed my title to "DeusExP55" :-P Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.