M.Beier Posted November 13, 2009 Share Posted November 13, 2009 (edited) EDIT: Compare URL: http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=899805 http://hwbot.org/result.history.do?resultId=899805 This result has been approved by NeoForce today... I reported it last night, thing is I believe Im no#1 on aircooled setup in 2003.... I was wondering about that result for some days, because I dont believe AMD hits as high CPC as P55.... So, I tested it,,,, My results were less then 100K with 4ghz sharp on my 965C3 using one card at stock clocks, using two it was rather 116-117K, bare in mind; quite decent tweaked OS. Now why did I report that result.. Its photoshopped, using a X2 card you will get "Enabled (2 GPUs), Sideport Off", notice how its listed as "Disabled", I suggested that this is because the REAL text was "Enabled (4 GPUs), Sideport Off",.... I think when cheating in such aggressive way, a permban from the bot is in order.... I showed Massman the result on 11-11-09, but at that point I hadnt figured the bug/cheat, I just noticed last night and reported :-) .... NeoForce, I dont understand how you can approve the result when I have given this explaination in the report... Edited November 13, 2009 by M.Beier Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted November 13, 2009 Share Posted November 13, 2009 A nature subtest score of 870-ish indicates multi-card 4870X2 setup. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.Beier Posted November 13, 2009 Author Share Posted November 13, 2009 the score you linked was not reported by anyone... http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=899805 it was never reported? Must have been a bug, I did report it, however it asked me to sign in, so I did But I thought it went through, seeing it became valid today, its not a new result. Anyhow; Glad that its none approved no more, I think the user needs to explain his actions, or why its "valid", a decent chance, yet if equinox fails doing so, I do believe he deserves a permban... So; He has 2x 2003, one with CFX which is clearly higher? Yes: 1) the 113 result is with CFX 2) The 123? result is with CFX at 80x/100x mhz and NONE WHQL driver, besides, I was using 20x200 4ghz, 800mhz crap timings (fast test) and got 116-117K, the 123K score is highly possible, especially with 42xxmhz.... My gain from 3ghz to 4ghz was 9k I recall. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew NeoForce Posted November 13, 2009 Crew Share Posted November 13, 2009 I saw result is repoted - but no explanation like jmke shows log. And I see valid ORB link - so.. Now knowing the story - for sure we need explanation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.Beier Posted November 15, 2009 Author Share Posted November 15, 2009 Sorry about my harsh way NeoForce, hope I havent offended you... Im on very unstable internet, it probably just crashed, however, here it stated it went through.... I thought someone had removed my report, took me quite some time to spot the simple sign :-) I will use this section a bit more in future, and give Massman a bit rest on messenger (Dont get too excited PJP, I will still talk about women :-P) EDIT: Oh and he wont get rest untill he fixed my title to "DeusExP55" :-P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.