I.M.O.G. Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 If I go here: http://hwbot.org/team/overclockers.com/#Members It says Optytrooper is the biggest contributor with 975 points. Since this is the team page, it doesn't make much sense to list the top contributor according to User Points (UP/10 count for the team)... It seems top contributors on the team page should have TPP displayed instead (or TPP + UP/10), in which case it would say optytrooper has contributed 2100 or 2200 points to the team. On a similar note, when it lists the top 5 contributors in the current month, it lists them according to Userpoints I believe. Since this is displayed on the team page as well, it would make more sense to me to list them according to TPP, or TPP + UP/10. Basically, since Rev4 doesn't count UP for much of anything other than personal totals, maybe the team member page is due for an update to reflect the more important numbers - TPP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hondacity Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 +1 taco! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 The members are listed by User Contribution as far as I can see? TPP + UP/10 = user contribution. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted January 23, 2012 Crew Share Posted January 23, 2012 The members are listed by User Contribution as far as I can see? TPP + UP/10 = user contribution. yes, but i think he meant when it says "OptyTrooper has contributed the most, with a total of xxx points! .. -> it shows the UP and not the contribution. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 Oh, right, now I see. Yes, that should change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 http://bugs.hwbot.org/browse/HWBOT-692 Scheduled it for r4.6.2 release as it should only be a few minutes work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.M.O.G. Posted January 23, 2012 Author Share Posted January 23, 2012 Thanks for the assist on the clarification there, thats what I intended. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 Good catch, guys:) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.