Gamer Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=737411 WTF, I have never cheated and I never will. I feel no need to do this. One member reports this and no questions asked, just block the score ? Please rectify this. Thanks. Quote
Crew NeoForce Posted December 10, 2009 Crew Posted December 10, 2009 (edited) SM 3.0 is too high for your card and frequencies. Score is not good for rankings. Any reason - bug, bad run, too "tweaked" settings or smth else - it should be blocked and it is. ________ Ipad accessories Edited May 13, 2011 by NeoForce Quote
Gamer Posted December 10, 2009 Author Posted December 10, 2009 I see nothing strange in this SM 3.0 score. Please explain. I don't like that "tweaked" reply of yours, you want to say cheat with these "" ? This one has been done with lower CPU speeds and card clocks. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=745001 Nothing wrong here but if you compare I'm in line ? Quote
knopflerbruce Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 (edited) If we had suspected cheating, you would most likely be banned;) Edit: to me it looks like SM2.0 and SM3.0 are too close... but could the reason be a bugged low SM2.0 instead of high SM3.0? Edited December 10, 2009 by knopflerbruce Quote
Crew NeoForce Posted December 10, 2009 Crew Posted December 10, 2009 (edited) If GT1 is bugged low - score will be much lower at all. Score that you show as example is OK - no anomalies. "Tweaked" - means disabling PostProcessing for example - discussed here: http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=4195 ________ MEDICAL MARIJUANA DOCTOR Edited May 13, 2011 by NeoForce Quote
Gamer Posted December 10, 2009 Author Posted December 10, 2009 I know all about those "tweaks" but I never use them, let alone try them. Quote
Crew NeoForce Posted December 10, 2009 Crew Posted December 10, 2009 (edited) I`ve checked more scores - looks like your run is bugged as knopflerbruce said - too low GT1. And seems to be my mistake in this case. Set as checked ________ PROBLEMS FROM ZOLOFT Edited May 13, 2011 by NeoForce Quote
Massman Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 This score was posted more than 1,5y ago ... SM3.0 is normal for those clocks; SM2.0 is about 200 points too low. Quote
Crew NeoForce Posted December 10, 2009 Crew Posted December 10, 2009 (edited) Time doesn`t matter if it was c***t. But it is no - so my excuses one more time. ________ SH150I Edited May 13, 2011 by NeoForce Quote
Gamer Posted December 10, 2009 Author Posted December 10, 2009 Thanks NeoForce for rectifying this. :ws: You do one hell of a job and thank you for that. No hard feelings, maybe I acted a bit harsh, but I don't want to be called a cheater. I'm to old for that shit This score was posted more than 1,5y ago ... SM3.0 is normal for those clocks; SM2.0 is about 200 points too low. Damn, I could have been first Quote
71proste Posted December 14, 2009 Posted December 14, 2009 (edited) I was the one who reported your score but never called you cheater Score looks suspicious and I have reported as simple as that. I thought it was Post Processing Disabled but now I see that sm 2.0 GT2 score is too low. SM2.0 and SM3.0 are too close I hope you understand my reason Edited December 14, 2009 by 71proste Quote
westsider Posted December 14, 2009 Posted December 14, 2009 (edited) ................................. Edited December 14, 2009 by westsider Quote
westsider Posted December 14, 2009 Posted December 14, 2009 (edited) ............................. Edited December 14, 2009 by westsider Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.