http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=737411

 

WTF, I have never cheated and I never will.

I feel no need to do this.

 

One member reports this and no questions asked, just block the score ?

 

Please rectify this.

Thanks.

SM 3.0 is too high for your card and frequencies.

Score is not good for rankings.

 

Any reason - bug, bad run, too "tweaked" settings or smth else - it should be blocked and it is.

________

Ipad accessories

Edited May 13, 201114 yr by NeoForce

I see nothing strange in this SM 3.0 score.

Please explain.

I don't like that "tweaked" reply of yours, you want to say cheat with these "" ?

 

This one has been done with lower CPU speeds and card clocks.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=745001

Nothing wrong here but if you compare I'm in line ?

If we had suspected cheating, you would most likely be banned;)

 

Edit: to me it looks like SM2.0 and SM3.0 are too close... but could the reason be a bugged low SM2.0 instead of high SM3.0?

Edited December 10, 200915 yr by knopflerbruce

If GT1 is bugged low - score will be much lower at all.

 

Score that you show as example is OK - no anomalies.

 

"Tweaked" - means disabling PostProcessing for example - discussed here: http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=4195

________

MEDICAL MARIJUANA DOCTOR

Edited May 13, 201114 yr by NeoForce

I know all about those "tweaks" but I never use them, let alone try them.

I`ve checked more scores - looks like your run is bugged as knopflerbruce said - too low GT1.

 

And seems to be my mistake in this case.

 

Set as checked

________

PROBLEMS FROM ZOLOFT

Edited May 13, 201114 yr by NeoForce

This score was posted more than 1,5y ago ...

 

SM3.0 is normal for those clocks; SM2.0 is about 200 points too low.

Time doesn`t matter if it was c***t.

But it is no - so my excuses one more time.

________

SH150I

Edited May 13, 201114 yr by NeoForce

Thanks NeoForce for rectifying this. :ws:

You do one hell of a job and thank you for that.

 

No hard feelings, maybe I acted a bit harsh, but I don't want to be called a cheater.

I'm to old for that shit

 

This score was posted more than 1,5y ago ...

 

SM3.0 is normal for those clocks; SM2.0 is about 200 points too low.

 

Damn, I could have been first

 

Lol, you sure ?

I was the one who reported your score but never called you cheater

Score looks suspicious and I have reported as simple as that. I thought it was Post Processing Disabled but now I see that sm 2.0 GT2 score is too low.

SM2.0 and SM3.0 are too close

I hope you understand my reason

Edited December 14, 200915 yr by 71proste

.................................

Edited December 14, 200915 yr by westsider

.............................

Edited December 14, 200915 yr by westsider