stealth Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 (edited) @massman, http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=942049 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=942048 Same story over and over again, in my profile page it says that two of my submissions require my attention.The user fuzz3l & Kovsk reported my scores in Celeron 420 category,calls me a possible cheater and he doesn't like my superPi window. (see attachment). I can't go through the same thing again and try to prove i am not an elephant.I don't know what else to do than throw this CPU out of the window.This CPU does low efficiency scores. Here is last year's thread: http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=2570 I have a faster score than this one in 1M category, 17.094s @3455.5MHz and i think i can do lower than 17'' at 3487MHz. Mr. fuzz3l & Kovsk, have a look at this and tell me what is the strange thing in superPi window? http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=27555&postcount=27 Do i have to take your permission on how to tweak my windows or do you think you are the only person in the world who knows maxmem, copy wazza and other tweaks? Thanks for your attention. stealth Edited January 11, 2010 by stealth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stealth Posted January 13, 2010 Author Share Posted January 13, 2010 (edited) Ok, my 32M superPi checked by a moderator and the warning gone from my profile page But for the 1M low efficiency score still there, what about it? I gave so many runs with the same CPU last year, all of them were under 60k efficiensy, must be the CPU guys, i don't have any other exlpanation. stealth Edited January 13, 2010 by stealth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzz3l Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 (edited) Sorry, but i think this cannot be true... I tried so many runs the last days and i never reached your efficiency, all my runs are round about 17,4-17,5s with 3440Mhz... And i tried 3 OS which are for E86 very fast (<45k PP) and tried different CW Sizes but i never get your result, never... Or do you have an "unknown" Bios on your RE? What is your PL and which Strap do you run on RE? Regards PS: Here the Screen of my 32m (can't upload it here, the PNG file won't work here...): http://www.abload.de/img/pi32m-3440-14.17.906-o65pr.jpg PPS: And why you aren't in front for example in PiFast or wPrime? If your CPU produce such a high efficiency... Edited January 14, 2010 by Kovsk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stealth Posted January 14, 2010 Author Share Posted January 14, 2010 (edited) Sorry, but i think this cannot be true... It is true believe it or not, if you have a look at last year's thread you will see that all the scores i provided have efficiensy under 60k. http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=2570 Or do you have an "unknown" Bios on your RE? What is your PL and which Strap do you run on RE? You can see my bios at the screenshot, 0301...i have 0201 is well...etc.. Light, PL5, strap 200, 1/2. And why you aren't in front for example in PiFast or wPrime? If your CPU produce such a high efficiency... Different benchmarks...act different...haven't run wPrime under single stage though...no time... I have a faster one 1M... stealth Edited January 14, 2010 by stealth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzz3l Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Last question: Why look your 32m Window different compared to your 1m? Btw: I tried same settings as you, also with "Stronger" and lower Ramtimings but i can't reach your Scores...hmm...well.... Or CL7 is faster than CL6 but i cannot/will not understand this... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stealth Posted January 14, 2010 Author Share Posted January 14, 2010 Last question: Why look your 32m Window different compared to your 1m? Light 95MB version XP only for 32M. stealth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted January 15, 2010 Share Posted January 15, 2010 (edited) @stealth - verified I tried so many runs the last days and i never reached your efficiency While I understand your frustration, this alone is not sufficient reason to reach any conclusions. Edited January 15, 2010 by Maxi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stealth Posted January 16, 2010 Author Share Posted January 16, 2010 Thanks a lot. stealth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George_o/c Posted January 17, 2010 Share Posted January 17, 2010 Light 95MB version XP only for 32M. stealth It's mine, I guarantee it's a fast one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzz3l Posted January 18, 2010 Share Posted January 18, 2010 Do you want so share it? Also please the 1m Windows... Regards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.