tiborrr Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 Hello, An hwbot crew member, demiurg, has blocked one of your team mates ('Moonman') scores. It has been marked as 'incorrect submission'. This was the reason the user gave: Score is not valid. You can view your result here: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=943472 You can find out more about the reporting user here: http://hwbot.org/community/user/demiurg Hello, the score is very well valid. As you may or may not know, x86 validator has some serious issues with K10.5 chips, many of my validations made with X2 550, X3 720 or X4 955 are 'red crossed'. Please unblock it as soon as possible. Best Regards, Niko Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiborrr Posted January 12, 2010 Author Share Posted January 12, 2010 (edited) To those who think we have the same CPU. We benched it together, side by side, we even had a little OC contest among ourselves: Rezultati srečanja: Naredili smo tekmovanje v 5ih kategorijah: Super Pi 3DMark05 CPU-Z V-PRIME PiFast Super Pi: 1. mesto : PERKO - Dobil nagrado od sponzorja DINOKOMP - Prolimatech Megahalems + 2X Xigmatek XLF-F1253 LED - Hladilnik z dvema vent. 2. mesto: NOVAK - Dobil nagrado od sponzorja RODOCOMP - Razer Copperhead - Miška 3. mesto: TOXIC - Dobil nagrado od sponzorja NOCTUA - Noctua NF-S12B FLX - Ventilator 3DMark05: 1. mesto: PERKO 49.556 - Dobil nagrado od sponzorja NOCTUA - Noctua NH-D14 - Hladilnik 2. mesto: TOXIC 44.987 - Dobil nagrado od sponzorja RODOCOMP - Razer DeathAdder - Miška 3. mesto: MOONMAN 42.995 - Dobil nagrado od sponzorja NOCTUA - Noctua NF-S12B FLX - Ventilator CPU-Z: 1. mesto: XPQ - 4789 Mhz - Dobil nagrado od sponzorja XILENCE - Xilence Black Hawk - Hladilnik - Dosegel 3. najboljši rezultat na svetu z proc. Intel E2160 !!!!! 2. mesto: MOONMAN - 6817 Mhz - Dobil nagrado od sponzorja RODOCOMP - Razer Salmosa - Miška 3. mesto: TIBORRR - 6713 Mhz - Dobil nagrado od sponzorja NOCTUA - Noctua NF-S12B FLX - Ventilator wPrime: 1. mesto: PERKO - 3,256 - Dobil nagrado od sponzorja JCP - JCP VEGA - Ohišje 2. mesto: MOONMAN - 6,003 - Dobil nagrado od sponzorja XILENCE - Xilence Blade Pro - Hladilnik 3. mesto: TIBORRR - 6,078 - Dobil nagrado od sponzorja COOLINK - Coolink SWiF2-1200 - Ventilator PiFast: 1. mesto: PERKO - 14,52 - Dobil nagrado od sponzorja DINOKOMP - Xigmatek Asgard - Ohišje 2. mesto: MOONMAN - 17,05 - Dobil nagrado od sponzorja NOCTUA - 2X NOCTUA NF-S12B FLX - Ventilatorja 3. mesto: TIBORRR - 17,56 - Dobil nagrado od sponzorja NOCTUA - Noctua NT-H1 - Termalna pasta ČESTITKE VSEM !!!!! :banana: :dejstvo: Sistemi: SPQ: ASUS P5K Intel Pentium Dual Core E2160 Crucial 2GB 67Mhz cl5 KIT Sapphire Radeon HD4890 1GB Vapor-X Hlajenje: LN2 TOXIC: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7 Intel Xeon W3540 G.Skill RipJaws 4GB 2000Mhz cl9 KIT Sapphire Radeon HD5850 1GB = 3kom. CF Hlajenje: LN2 PERKO: EVGA X58 Classifeld Intel Core i9 - 6-jedrni proc. OCZ Platinum 6GB 1600Mhz cl7 KIT Sapphire Radeon HD5870 1GB = 3kom. CF Hlajenje: LN2 NOVAK: ASUS Rampage Extreme Intel Core2Duo E8600 CSX Diablo 2GB 2000Mhz cl9 KIT Sapphire Radeon HD4870 512MB Hlajenje: LN2 TIBORRR: ASUS M4A78T-E Crucial 1GB 106Mhz cl7 KIT AMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition Sapphire Radeon HD4890 1GB Vapor-X Hlajenje: LN2 MOONMAN: ASUS Crosshair III Formula AMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition Apogee Blazer GT 2GB 1800Mhz cl7 KIT Sapphire Radeon HD4890 1GB = 2kom. CF Hlajenje: LN2 Tiborrr se ni strinjal s toplim RedBullom... tiborrr žejen Moonman tiborrr (left) & Moonman (right) Edited January 12, 2010 by tiborrr Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiborrr Posted January 12, 2010 Author Share Posted January 12, 2010 Go cry in the corners, crybabies. Here's the original thread: http://www.oc-lab.si/forum/viewtopic.php?p=78297#p78297 (start here and scroll down) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiborrr Posted January 12, 2010 Author Share Posted January 12, 2010 Now what? You need less than 4 hoursto block the result but you need a whole day to hear the explanation and still do nothing about it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 Now what? You need less than 4 hoursto block the result but you need a whole day to hear the explanation and still do nothing about it? Please unblock it as soon as possible. It was you who explicitly gave us the time we needed to get to this. Don't give us time and then complain it's taking too long. Furthermore, I'd appreciate it if you kept all the negative comments to yourself. Things like Go cry in the corners, crybabies. ... I don't really care for. Anyway, I'll unblock the score. The problem is most likely increasing the clock frequency on one core, but not the other three resulting in a too big delta between them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiborrr Posted January 12, 2010 Author Share Posted January 12, 2010 Sry Pieter, I'm a bit jumpy today. Didn't mean to be harsh but I hate when I get called a cheater. It's not the validator issue anymore, it's the sole fact that the result was reported by a guy who lost two positions in X4 955 rankings (KonradGT). He reported this results for this reason: The same CPU as have got tiborr! One CPU - double users! Which is a bit fat lie, at best I can call it 'jumping to conclusions' without any knowing. How could we share the CPU if we were benching it simultaneously, in front of at least 50 people? The picture & the links I provided does not prove it or what? Do we need to take pictures from our chips and add a raised middle finger response to it? I'm a long term member of HWB, I have always played by the book so this is the reason why I reacted to negatively. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor941 Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 Hi Tiborrr, any member can report a score for good or bad reasons - as you know there are thousands of members and we are only a few guys to moderate - please allow us a few time Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiborrr Posted January 21, 2010 Author Share Posted January 21, 2010 Okay, the result has been blocked again with the reason of validation being corrupt. There is a reason between rejected validation and corrupt validation, you know? It's not our fault CPU-Z validation has issues with K10.5 chips. I have rejected validations with X2 550BE at stock speeds (!!!). I thought we were past this! Best Regards, Niko Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted January 21, 2010 Share Posted January 21, 2010 If the validation was currupt, canardpc would've rejected it while uploading. Score OK'ed, and by looking at the pifast and superpi runs there's no reason to think this is a bug. Hopefully it'll stay OK'ed this time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiborrr Posted January 21, 2010 Author Share Posted January 21, 2010 Oh the drama we have with CPU-Z validations Thanks Knut! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor941 Posted January 21, 2010 Share Posted January 21, 2010 ok sorry I did't know for the CPU-Z bug Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted January 21, 2010 Share Posted January 21, 2010 ok sorry I did't know for the CPU-Z bug Np, lots of things to learn when you're a mod. Everyone makes mistakes:p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor941 Posted January 21, 2010 Share Posted January 21, 2010 true lol I got hundreds of questions! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.