Wrong Result

[Veld]

jmke, date of bench - july 2005 and later (but they were submitted at april 2008.. strange, isn't it?). AFAIK, RivaTuner/PowerStrip already exist at those times, so it was possible to make normal screen, with sufficient information.

If those guys (from crazypc.ro) can prove that they benched 6600 DDR AGP (not 6600 DDR2 or DDR3.. exactly 6600 DDR AGP!) - no problem.. otherwise, their scores must be deleted.

 

Sorry for my English)

[Bustah]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718147

 

no cpuz? cpu could be anything?

[Veld]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637713 - suspect PiFast score.. perhaps 4.3

 

Please check this..

[Veld]

jmke, I repeat - if those guys (from crazypc.ro) can prove that they benched 6600 DDR AGP (not 6600 DDR2 or DDR3.. exactly 6600 DDR AGP!) - no problem.. otherwise, their scores must be deleted

 

Insufficient verifications for rankings. Please check it..

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719189

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719244

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719187

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719284

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718746

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718873

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718900

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719113

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719139

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719076

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719722

[K404]

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=649274 (3DM03)

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=554578 (3DM05)

 

Both way too high for the clocks. Category- 7800GTX

[71proste]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718806 wrong category

[71proste]

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=649274 (3DM03)

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=554578 (3DM05)

 

Both way too high for the clocks. Category- 7800GTX

 

 

too high for the clocks?please dont be funny and compare to the other results,both results uploaded more than year ago,7800GTX vmoded,normal score for such clocks,check the test details,no cheats

You report my results because i've reported yours,whatever man....shame i sold this card,I could show you better scores

[K404]

I am and have compared to other results- that why iv reported those two scores.

 

3DMark03-

 

you have 330MHz more on the CPU, the same GPU core clock and 25MHz more on the GDDR, yet somehow your score is 1600 points higher than mine.

 

Your score is also 600 points higher than Blindfitters- who has a QX9650 clocked 600MHz higher than your E66, a similar core clock and 40MHz less on the GDDR.

 

You think your score looks normal?

 

3DM05-

 

your score is 600 points higher than mine, despite having lower graphics clocks.

 

 

I KNOW how to bench, I even went through maybe 6 driver sets looking for differences. Your scores make no sense.

[71proste]

I read your post and can't believe it what you wrote

I dont have to explain anything,you should know as overclocker that cpu speed is not everything for a good score!!!!!Drivers,OS and a lot other things are sometimes more important than cpu,but I see you dont know anything about.

 

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634322

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605603 no verification,still not fixed

[K404]

Awwww...isnt that sweet. I report yours, so you report mine.

 

You can keep reporting those scores- every time I change an FM link to fix a reported result, another result goes without. That wont be fixed because im not going to generate a new FM account every time I submit scores for a new bit of kit

 

You can resort to accusing me of not knowing anything, but im going to be mature and not retort back. OS is unlikely to make that big-a difference to scores. What drivers did you use? Il try them, compared to the 84.21 iv found to work best for me so far.

 

Report as many of my scores as you want. All are 100% legit, and nothing you can do or say can change that.

[Veld]

Insufficient verifications for rankings (there is no proof that's exactly 6600 DDR AGP)

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719244

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719187

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719284

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718873

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719113

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719139

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719076

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719722 - look at score's description..

 

jmke, please check this again...

[71proste]

Report as many of my scores as you want. All are 100% legit, and nothing you can do or say can change that.

 

it's not like that....don't forget that I was first who reported your results and you did same...anyway I don't care of your results/profile im not even gonna check it...but you have to have verification links..

[K404]

I didnt know it was you. I didnt know a user could find out who reported their scores. I only found out because I was cleaning out old results with no points..

[Veld]

ok all done now

What? Where?

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719187 - 6600 DDR AGP? You can prove it?

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719284 - another 6600 (DDR? AGP? PCI?)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719113 - another 6600 (DDR? AGP? PCI?) BTW, this score submitted twice!! look here

[DopeLex]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718758

 

Wrong Category - look at description -> "Powercolor 9500@9700, P4 3.0C @ 3.75"

[Monstru]

bad post

[sacha35]

Sorry Guys here are some more i have found.

Please check these results wrong category I.E 512mb card in 1024 Group, or verification link does not work.

 

There is still more to be put in right group but the ORB is playing up so will have a look though a bit latter.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721049

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680781

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682900

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680870

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702663

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695545

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669380

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669613

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=662271

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657415

[sacha35]

Please check these results wrong category I.E 512mb card in 1024 Group, or verification link does not work.

 

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688823

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688825

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688821

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688812

[Svikens]

I think ther is some mistake wrong CPU

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721270

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721259

[71proste]

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=649274 (3DM03)

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=554578 (3DM05)

 

Both way too high for the clocks. Category- 7800GTX

 

that was reason to delete my scores?

[Bustah]

Please check this';

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718147

 

no cpuz? cpu could be anything?

[K404]

that was reason to delete my scores?

 

Thats why i reported them. I didnt delete them, if thats what you mean?

[71proste]

You are not moderator,so I know you did not delete my scores.

The thing is I can report 10mln.results and so what?must be a reason and yours wasn't enouhgt to delete my scores.Test details shows that bench was ok,I have edit these results many times,maybe I forgot to change speed of cpu or gpu I dont remember(it was more than year ago)BUT THIS IS NOT A REASON TO DELETE RESULTS.

I think jmke did it,so I need him to explain me why??

[mtech]

Please, check these results:

7600GS DDR3 results posted in 7600GS DDR2 category:

1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719200

2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719184

3. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580264

[71proste]

I did not delete any scores this week because they were too high.!!

 

 

08 Apr 2008 12:38 reported K404 reported by user due to lack of validation (score is high for the clockspeeds compared to the scores around him. Also- screenshot doesnt have much info.)

08 Apr 2008 10:46 cheat (crew) NeoForce impossible score at given settings. might be a cheat. (please provide more proof)

 

08 Apr 2008 10:47 cheat (crew) NeoForce impossible score at given settings. might be a cheat. (please provide more proof)

 

where is the proof that was cheat???????show me,please..

Not enouhgt info?It was before 2007 and nobody asked for more information on the screen,so I dont give a f*** that someone can't beat me.

I could leave dead verification link and if the result is older than one year you can't do anything with-am I right??this is the rule and??