K404 Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 I didnt know it was you. I didnt know a user could find out who reported their scores. I only found out because I was cleaning out old results with no points.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veld Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 ok all done now What? Where? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719187 - 6600 DDR AGP? You can prove it? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719284 - another 6600 (DDR? AGP? PCI?) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719113 - another 6600 (DDR? AGP? PCI?) BTW, this score submitted twice!! look here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DopeLex Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718758 Wrong Category - look at description -> "Powercolor 9500@9700, P4 3.0C @ 3.75" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 bad post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sacha35 Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 Sorry Guys here are some more i have found. Please check these results wrong category I.E 512mb card in 1024 Group, or verification link does not work. There is still more to be put in right group but the ORB is playing up so will have a look though a bit latter. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721049 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680781 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682900 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680870 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702663 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695545 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669380 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669613 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=662271 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657415 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sacha35 Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 Please check these results wrong category I.E 512mb card in 1024 Group, or verification link does not work. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688823 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688825 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688821 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688812 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Svikens Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 I think ther is some mistake wrong CPU http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721270 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721259 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=649274 (3DM03) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=554578 (3DM05) Both way too high for the clocks. Category- 7800GTX that was reason to delete my scores? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bustah Posted April 9, 2008 Share Posted April 9, 2008 Please check this'; http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718147 no cpuz? cpu could be anything? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted April 9, 2008 Share Posted April 9, 2008 that was reason to delete my scores? Thats why i reported them. I didnt delete them, if thats what you mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted April 9, 2008 Share Posted April 9, 2008 You are not moderator,so I know you did not delete my scores. The thing is I can report 10mln.results and so what?must be a reason and yours wasn't enouhgt to delete my scores.Test details shows that bench was ok,I have edit these results many times,maybe I forgot to change speed of cpu or gpu I dont remember(it was more than year ago)BUT THIS IS NOT A REASON TO DELETE RESULTS. I think jmke did it,so I need him to explain me why?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtech Posted April 9, 2008 Share Posted April 9, 2008 Please, check these results: 7600GS DDR3 results posted in 7600GS DDR2 category: 1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719200 2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719184 3. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580264 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted April 9, 2008 Share Posted April 9, 2008 I did not delete any scores this week because they were too high.!! 08 Apr 2008 12:38 reported K404 reported by user due to lack of validation (score is high for the clockspeeds compared to the scores around him. Also- screenshot doesnt have much info.) 08 Apr 2008 10:46 cheat (crew) NeoForce impossible score at given settings. might be a cheat. (please provide more proof) 08 Apr 2008 10:47 cheat (crew) NeoForce impossible score at given settings. might be a cheat. (please provide more proof) where is the proof that was cheat???????show me,please.. Not enouhgt info?It was before 2007 and nobody asked for more information on the screen,so I dont give a f*** that someone can't beat me. I could leave dead verification link and if the result is older than one year you can't do anything with-am I right??this is the rule and?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted April 9, 2008 Share Posted April 9, 2008 As I said maybe I forgot to change clocks when I edit my scores that was long time ago,but this isn't a reason to delete these scores! One more thing,these results are not blocked but deleted!!!This is realy not fair. Hello, An hwbot crew member, NeoForce, has blocked one of your submitted scores. It has been marked as 'impossible score at given settings. might be a cheat.'. might be a cheat?joke or what??where is the proof????????????????????I don't see any,it was long time ago,not in 2008... test datails shawn that bench was run with any cheats WHATEVER NeoForce,whatever man!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veld Posted April 9, 2008 Share Posted April 9, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637713 - suspect PiFast score.. perhaps 4.3 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=611552 - CPU-Z screen is absent Please check this.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted April 9, 2008 Crew Share Posted April 9, 2008 worng categorie that's a northwood p4 and no willamette. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718646 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zavlakas Posted April 9, 2008 Share Posted April 9, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721168 invalid checksum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 10, 2008 Share Posted April 10, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637713 - suspect PiFast score.. perhaps 4.3http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=611552 - CPU-Z screen is absent Please check this.. fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 10, 2008 Share Posted April 10, 2008 worng categorie that's a northwood p4 and no willamette.http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718646 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 10, 2008 Share Posted April 10, 2008 worng categorie that's a northwood p4 and no willamette.http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718646 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721168invalid checksum fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew NeoForce Posted April 10, 2008 Crew Share Posted April 10, 2008 71proste Relax, m8! Your screens doesn`t contain any info about frequencies of videocard. It is required by rules. And was always requiered Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted April 10, 2008 Share Posted April 10, 2008 71prosteRelax, m8! Your screens doesn`t contain any info about frequencies of videocard. It is required by rules. And was always requiered where,when,I dont know enything about and many people as well,I know we've got a new rules since 2008,but before?It doesn't matter anyway.....I spent a lot of time benching that's why im so angry,that's all... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted April 10, 2008 Share Posted April 10, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714698 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714704 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714713 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714746 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714691 this is GF 6200TC 128 not a TC 64 this screen show GF 6200TC 64,as you can see TC 128 with 128-256mb/8pixel/400mhz gpu and TC 64 with 64mb/4pixel/350mhz gpu pls move these results to the TC128 category Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted April 10, 2008 Share Posted April 10, 2008 Thank you mate,appreciate it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted April 10, 2008 Share Posted April 10, 2008 one of the top scores with no resolution(today) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721814 GF6200 no a 6200LE,results uploaded by the same guy http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698622 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698626 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698624 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698617 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698620 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698621 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699288 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589020 no verification Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts