demiurg Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 Advanced and no resolution..http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726204 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726207 and no gpuz http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719711 fixed There is no need in GPU-Z if RivaTuner is present Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 Wrong Wprime (ver 1.55 mandatory after 1-1-2008) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726279 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726283 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684805 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684807 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693889 ver 1.57 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693888 ver 1.57 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695189 ver 1.57 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=722497 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695667 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701541 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701531 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690781 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690396 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688795 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689104 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689990 ver 1.58 Hexus_PiFast: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640973 ***Error in Computation*** http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657804 ***Error in Computation*** http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627986 ***Error in Computation*** Please check this http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=705592 don't se part of screen (this computation seems ok??) fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stelaras Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 Wprime wrong - Ver. 1.55 mandatory after 01.01.2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721810 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706308 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721151 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721147 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698228 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692467 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690660 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682995 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682994 All results have been deleted except TaPaKaH's (Last two in this list) . Why ??? Date submitted is 1-1-08 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_A_V Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 wrong category: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726143 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726051 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manos_ir Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=725263 new result with no gpu-z + cpu-z as you ask from now on at aquamark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 Still same rules for AM3,screen only is enought I can't believe that people still forget to show resolution!!!One of the top scores(Today) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726148 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manos_ir Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 Still same rules for AM3,screen only is enought realy????? and why if you try to submit a aquamark score now...and you check the validation example you will see this screen????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kolian Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637252 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637254 Celeron 300A (Mendocino) submitted as Celeron 300 (Covington) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtech Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 Please, check this results: - ORB links are not valid: 1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591426 2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682767 3. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594975 4. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=583502 5. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=555887 6. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=590643 7. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556212 8. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=503944 - Incorrect category (7600GS DDR2 instead of 7600GS DDR3): 1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719200 1600MHz mem clock (it's impossible to reach with DDR2 mem) 2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726338 1740MHz mem clock (it's impossible to reach with DDR2 mem) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jowi69 Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 Crossfire does not work on Windows XP with 3870X2 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718420 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717326 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718470 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718181 please check this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 Flasher ! GeForce 6800 per Rivatuner switch to Quadro FX 1400 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650261 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650412 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650413 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653413 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650262 Quadro FX 1400 have CORE NV41 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_A_V Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 No 3dmark/cpuz window + no orb link: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610245 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=613414 wprime 1.58: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692976 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narmer Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=712934 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726151 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726507 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726508 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726031 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726509 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726510 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726473 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726511 0o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 v1.54 after 1.1.08 (which is not allowed, right?): http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702154 This result seems very... weird to me. Compare with other scores of A64 s939 dual cores. Bugged run? Seems a little too incredible. Fastest 939 chip in wprime32m is a chip @ 3130mhz?? (not even an FX60 @ 3.5ghz is CLOSE to that score - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=624575) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688407 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 No 3dmark/cpuz window + no orb link:http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610245 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=613414 wprime 1.58: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692976 Too old for moderation wPrime fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 v1.54 after 1.1.08 (which is not allowed, right?): http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702154 This result seems very... weird to me. Compare with other scores of A64 s939 dual cores. Bugged run? Seems a little too incredible. Fastest 939 chip in wprime32m is a chip @ 3130mhz?? (not even an FX60 @ 3.5ghz is CLOSE to that score - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=624575) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688407 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=712934http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726151 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726507 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726508 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726031 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726509 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726510 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726473 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726511 0o fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 thx but have more prime version 1.59 and look at CPU ! Athlon XP 2600 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707760'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707760 and his other benches at this ( XP 1900+ Pal ) categorie are make with this CPU. FAKE ! Look CPUZ PIC http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707086 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702347 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=710538 http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=324042 stand´s only AMD Athlon this comes when you use lower Multi at unlocked CPU - normaly stand AMD Athlon XP 1900+ here is the right CPU - forgot to downgrade the multi - looool http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707760 Flasher ! GeForce 6800 per Rivatuner switch to Quadro FX 1400 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650261 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650412 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650413 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653413 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650262 Quadro FX 1400 have CORE NV41 ? ? ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narmer Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726779 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_1318 all entries wrong GPU Core Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Sweet Posted April 23, 2008 Crew Share Posted April 23, 2008 Wrong WPrime (ver 1.55 mandatory after 1-1-2008) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693669 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699472 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697271 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697262 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691487 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688165 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726818 ver 1.54 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726819 ver 1.54 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726698 ver 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726699 ver 1.61 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 24, 2008 Share Posted April 24, 2008 Wrong WPrime (ver 1.55 mandatory after 1-1-2008) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693669 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699472 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697271 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697262 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691487 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688165 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726818 ver 1.54 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726819 ver 1.54 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726698 ver 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726699 ver 1.61 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veld Posted April 24, 2008 Share Posted April 24, 2008 Wrong category (P4 1.6 Willamette score in P4 1.6A category) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622763 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622765 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650578 - lol http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=623388 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622767 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=620052 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650571 - suspect score.. it seems to be P4 1.6 Willamette score in P4 1.6A category (look at background) Please check this and remove.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DopeLex Posted April 24, 2008 Share Posted April 24, 2008 Radeon 9500@9700 in Radeon 9700mobility category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719329 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabski Posted April 24, 2008 Share Posted April 24, 2008 just a quick question. Do all Cpu-z results need a validation link or is a photo of the screen valid ? or is a screen shot valid ? Many thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts