Bwanasoft Posted April 24, 2008 Share Posted April 24, 2008 Wrong category (P4 1.6 Willamette score in P4 1.6A category)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622763 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622765 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650578 - lol http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=623388 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622767 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=620052 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650571 - suspect score.. it seems to be P4 1.6 Willamette score in P4 1.6A category (look at background) Please check this and remove.. Wrong Categorie - Sorry but is from 09/2007 edit by self Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alibabar Posted April 24, 2008 Share Posted April 24, 2008 Wrong Category: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=618833 ; move to 7900GT category !!! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=618925 ; move to 7950 GX2 category !!! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719635 ; move to X1900XT category !!! Best regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_A_V Posted April 24, 2008 Share Posted April 24, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709216 Please check again. I added link to SubmitResults.html file + link to screenshot of SubmitResults.html. It is enough verification for AM3 or not? Also I just added SubmitResults.html for ALL my AM3 results posted in 2008 year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Sweet Posted April 24, 2008 Crew Share Posted April 24, 2008 Wrong WPrime http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727298 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=712450 ver 1.58 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 25, 2008 Share Posted April 25, 2008 Wrong Category: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=618833 ; move to 7900GT category !!! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=618925 ; move to 7950 GX2 category !!! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719635 ; move to X1900XT category !!! Best regards fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alibabar Posted April 25, 2008 Share Posted April 25, 2008 Wrong Category: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=704285 ; move to 2x (SLI) 7900GTO category !!! Best regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparkY1000 Posted April 25, 2008 Share Posted April 25, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=714778 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=715047 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=714779 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=714780 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=715049 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=715048 All in the wrong category, cpu-z shows socket nanoBGA2 hence mobile, should all be in here.... http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1606 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DopeLex Posted April 26, 2008 Share Posted April 26, 2008 (Still not fixed) Radeon 9500@9700 in Radeon 9700mobility category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719329 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narmer Posted April 26, 2008 Share Posted April 26, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680120 more proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683495 bad category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727171 more proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727924 bad screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727962 more proof Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted April 27, 2008 Share Posted April 27, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=651656 Screenshot in the link to forumpost shows a Prescott in the Northwood category. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabski Posted April 27, 2008 Share Posted April 27, 2008 1.43 not 1.41 pifast http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=711843 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oDDiTy Posted April 27, 2008 Share Posted April 27, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728504 3dmark 2005 result in 3dmark 2006 category Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Sweet Posted April 27, 2008 Crew Share Posted April 27, 2008 Wrong Wprime http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727933 ver 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728015 ver. 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728641 wrong score, Wprime 1024 ,. post in Wprime 32 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=714778http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=715047 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=714779 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=714780 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=715049 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=715048 All in the wrong category, cpu-z shows socket nanoBGA2 hence mobile, should all be in here.... http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1606 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=651656 Screenshot in the link to forumpost shows a Prescott in the Northwood category. fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Wrong Wprime http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727933 ver 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728015 ver. 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728641 wrong score, Wprime 1024 ,. post in Wprime 32 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 1.43 not 1.41 pifast http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=711843 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 You do very nice work Demiurg, thanks. :woot: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Just Learnin' You are welcome! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narmer Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683495 bad category - Mobile Celeron 1.6Ghz in Mobile Celeron 1.8Ghz edit1 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728404 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728204 edit2 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610877 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtech Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Please, check these results: 1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728159 Result is too high for this CPU clock: 4450MHz - 4min 41sec You can compare with this result, for example: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=652804 5111MHz - 8min 26sec. 2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726385 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726383 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726362 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726381 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728146 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728143'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728143 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728145'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728145 - Results are too high for these CPU clocks. For example: 4410MHz - 8sec 590ms You can compare with this result, for example: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=652803 5111MHz - 16sec 0ms - Possible hardware sharing (results are posted with the same CPU clock at approx. the same time): http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728143 posted: 26-04-2008 08:41, CPU clock = 3828MHz http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728145 posted: 26-04-2008 08:54, CPU clock= 3828MHz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lunatic@98 Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Please, check these results:1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728159 Result is too high for this CPU clock: 4450MHz - 4min 41sec It s a Ghost-Result http://wprime.net/search.html?r=searchscore&q=USER%3D%27petr00kos%27&o=Score 2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726385http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726383 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726362 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726381 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728146 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728143 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728145 - Results are too high for these CPU clocks. For example: 4410MHz - 8sec 590ms I think, there are QX9650 For example, the 4410MHz CPU from fuego http://wprime.net/search.html?r=searchscore&q=USER%3D%22fuego%22&o= wprime is a funny automatic reading benchmark, lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toutatoc Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Why ,it's validated with only checksum on Wprime. You can require screens like the others benchs ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683495bad category - Mobile Celeron 1.6Ghz in Mobile Celeron 1.8Ghz edit1 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728404 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728204 edit2 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610877 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
malefic Fess Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=710571 CPU-Z validation is rejected Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts