demiurg Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729893 -No CPU description, and the superpi screen looks... weird:o Compare with other runs, too! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=618530 - obviously wrong pifast version (10 sec difference to #2) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617702 - NO verification at all (I know it's a bit old, but lack of proof is an understatement) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=491165 - really old result, but no CPU info (which makes me think it may not have been valid when it was submitted) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617490 - NO verification (same as 617702) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556050 - same as above http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617563 - same as above fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=715457bugged run (fps in mother nature is too high) fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=716595http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610013 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609947 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591118 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=630147 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575960 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629393 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569497 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591117 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573659 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629395 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569513 - not sure if these are valid or not, so I'll let you decide (most have no CPUZ windows). http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580575 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561622 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575952 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572507 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565161 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561621 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581306 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572938 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=566722 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561865 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571062 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561800 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562167 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571059 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=614156 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561801 - invalid checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574608 - NO verification http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660937 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=563714 - missing CPU info http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684149 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684511 - 1.58/after 1.1.08 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700068 - screenshot link broken (?) These are all the questionable scores I could find for dual core s939 opterons. Is it possible to validate illegal versions, btw? Like if I bench with 1.58, and upload the score, will the checksum be valid? fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 Flasher http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=10818 at this Categorie he flashed a 7900 GT/GTX to Quadro FX 3500 http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_1066 FX 3500 have 20/7 Pixel Vertex and GTX have 24/8 and the other benches at this Categorie are suspect too fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700068 The link of the screenshot is good on the forum link post. There's just this character " [ " on more in the link to the screenshot link http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/7458/26753208id7.jpg http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729258 Wrong category or wrong result. There's a pifast screenshot. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567231 No screenshot and no verification possible ? fixed Your screenshot is not valid, because there is no CPU-Z memory tab. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 Wrong WPrime http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688298 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688524 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684574 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=704338 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701705 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731144 Checksum Invalid date 03-05-2008 No Cpu-z (CPU and Memory) only screen Wprime http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=725734 Please check it fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 Hi Guys, Is this result Ok for Prime1024 ? http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=730699 Was done on 1.55, but only shows as "Core 2 Quad" - its a QX9650. Cheers, Rich. fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 3. Attempt Not sure about 8400GS, rest is fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=725531http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720489 Two ident scores from the same user. One submitted manually, second is forum post for/from another team. fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 PiFast - 35.76 sec - cht! (Union Francophone Hwbot)Processor: Athlon 64 3800+ X2 ... @ 2150mhz [#1 Athlon 64 3800+ X2 Windsor in PiFast] on air http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=730645 On screen write Pifast4.3 And other score the same user - cht! (Union Francophone Hwbot) On screen write Pifast4.3 : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=730959 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=730616 No CPU-Z or other programs... Only Pifast http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=109481&thumb=false fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepek86 Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731677 no proof, bad screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728419 screen doesn't show cpu http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727924 screen cover lap time http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731744 no proof, bad screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731737 no proof, bad screen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 Please move all Gotcha's results from 7500LE 64mb category to 256mb category: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731111 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731112 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731110 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731109 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731108 Gotcha you can ask Bwanasoft to make new category for your self http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729699 not enought proof Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veld Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 demiurg, thanks for those SPi 32M scores (you know what I mean)! ) But what about this? frebrez received both scores.. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637225 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636553 Please check this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toutatoc Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731749 Nothing on the screen ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 demiurg, thanks for those SPi 32M scores (you know what I mean)! )But what about this? frebrez received both scores.. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637225 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636553 Please check this. fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanDynck Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 This user: http://hwbot.org/user.do?userId=6067 Have a lot of wrong results please do something!! Example: X1800 XT and X1800GTO2 dont show the especific model only the "X1800 Series" from 3DM. GMA950: no image, no screenshot, no link, no nothing!!! And a lot of results are the same wrong. This user is a joke!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vad78 Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731677 wrong result - it's not PCMark 2005 score, it's 3DMarks score http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727378 . And the screenshot is not sufficient information Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperhorn Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 Because of the fact my wPrime scores with v.1.58 were deleted, you should delete this result, too: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714606 It's 1.60, not 1.55 like hwbot wants... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731549 Needs to be moved - this is like a fat chick in the miss universe contest:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 5, 2008 Share Posted May 5, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731677 no proof, bad screenhttp://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728419 screen doesn't show cpu http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727924 screen cover lap time http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731744 no proof, bad screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731737 no proof, bad screen fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 5, 2008 Share Posted May 5, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729699 not enought proof fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 5, 2008 Share Posted May 5, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731549 Needs to be moved - this is like a fat chick in the miss universe contest:D fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lunatic@98 Posted May 5, 2008 Share Posted May 5, 2008 Wrong category "Go 7600 GT" in "7600 Go" list http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580585 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted May 5, 2008 Share Posted May 5, 2008 wrong wprime version after 1.1.08 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=715144 1.54 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697128 1.43 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698155 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697129 1.43 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699121 1.43 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699123 1.43 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepek86 Posted May 5, 2008 Share Posted May 5, 2008 wprime wrong version after 1.1.08 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720434 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720455 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698104 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721048 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721030 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697459 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=724427 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721044 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=708604 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731489 not enought proof, no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731988 bad screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731991 bad screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729812 bad screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729810 bad screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=732867 move from9200 PRO to 9200 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=732850 move from9200 PRO to 9200 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts