demiurg Posted April 28, 2008 Posted April 28, 2008 sparkY1000 said: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=714778http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=715047 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=714779 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=714780 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=715049 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=715048 All in the wrong category, cpu-z shows socket nanoBGA2 hence mobile, should all be in here.... http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1606 fixed
demiurg Posted April 28, 2008 Posted April 28, 2008 Quote http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=651656 Screenshot in the link to forumpost shows a Prescott in the Northwood category. fixed
demiurg Posted April 28, 2008 Posted April 28, 2008 Sweet said: Wrong Wprime http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727933 ver 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728015 ver. 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728641 wrong score, Wprime 1024 ,. post in Wprime 32 fixed
demiurg Posted April 28, 2008 Posted April 28, 2008 jabski said: 1.43 not 1.41 pifast http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=711843 fixed
Just Learnin' Posted April 28, 2008 Posted April 28, 2008 You do very nice work Demiurg, thanks. :woot:
Narmer Posted April 28, 2008 Posted April 28, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683495 bad category - Mobile Celeron 1.6Ghz in Mobile Celeron 1.8Ghz edit1 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728404 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728204 edit2 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610877
mtech Posted April 28, 2008 Posted April 28, 2008 Please, check these results: 1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728159 Result is too high for this CPU clock: 4450MHz - 4min 41sec You can compare with this result, for example: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=652804 5111MHz - 8min 26sec. 2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726385 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726383 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726362 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726381 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728146 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728143'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728143 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728145'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728145 - Results are too high for these CPU clocks. For example: 4410MHz - 8sec 590ms You can compare with this result, for example: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=652803 5111MHz - 16sec 0ms - Possible hardware sharing (results are posted with the same CPU clock at approx. the same time): http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728143 posted: 26-04-2008 08:41, CPU clock = 3828MHz http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728145 posted: 26-04-2008 08:54, CPU clock= 3828MHz
lunatic@98 Posted April 28, 2008 Posted April 28, 2008 mtech said: Please, check these results:1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728159 Result is too high for this CPU clock: 4450MHz - 4min 41sec It s a Ghost-Result http://wprime.net/search.html?r=searchscore&q=USER%3D%27petr00kos%27&o=Score mtech said: 2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726385http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726383 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726362 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726381 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728146 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728143 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728145 - Results are too high for these CPU clocks. For example: 4410MHz - 8sec 590ms I think, there are QX9650 For example, the 4410MHz CPU from fuego http://wprime.net/search.html?r=searchscore&q=USER%3D%22fuego%22&o= wprime is a funny automatic reading benchmark, lol
toutatoc Posted April 28, 2008 Posted April 28, 2008 Why ,it's validated with only checksum on Wprime. You can require screens like the others benchs ?
demiurg Posted April 29, 2008 Posted April 29, 2008 Narmer said: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683495bad category - Mobile Celeron 1.6Ghz in Mobile Celeron 1.8Ghz edit1 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728404 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728204 edit2 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610877 fixed
malefic Fess Posted April 29, 2008 Posted April 29, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=710571 CPU-Z validation is rejected
demiurg Posted April 29, 2008 Posted April 29, 2008 malefic Fess said: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=710571CPU-Z validation is rejected fixed
lunatic@98 Posted April 29, 2008 Posted April 29, 2008 wrong screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701051 is it a choke or not? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709040
demiurg Posted April 29, 2008 Posted April 29, 2008 lunatic@98 said: wrong screenhttp://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701051 is it a choke or not? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709040 fixed
Narmer Posted April 29, 2008 Posted April 29, 2008 thx demi http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610877 can't see a card model what about this?
Crew Sweet Posted April 29, 2008 Crew Posted April 29, 2008 Wrong Wprime http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707963 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693474 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700789 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696107 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696105 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693545 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699491 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699488 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=711240 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=711241 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685034 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685037 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729280 ver 1.61
demiurg Posted April 30, 2008 Posted April 30, 2008 Narmer said: thx demi http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610877 can't see a card model what about this? Too old, sorry
demiurg Posted April 30, 2008 Posted April 30, 2008 Sweet said: Wrong Wprime http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707963 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693474 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700789 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696107 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696105 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693545 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699491 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699488 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=711240 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=711241 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685034 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685037 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729280 ver 1.61 fixed
Veld Posted April 30, 2008 Posted April 30, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636553 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637225 frebrez received both scores, but one of them was signed by hs... wtf?! __________________________________ http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636558 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637227 Very suspect similar scores (mem timings the same.. Vcore the same.. screen's design the same) Please check them..
71proste Posted April 30, 2008 Posted April 30, 2008 demiurg said: Too old, sorry even if the screen is wrong?
demiurg Posted April 30, 2008 Posted April 30, 2008 71proste said: even if the screen is wrong? I cannot say this is cheated results so I cannot delete it and I cannot request more verification because it is too old
Pepek86 Posted April 30, 2008 Posted April 30, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728376 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728432 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728392 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729414 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727171 screen is blurry http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729303 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728628 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729300 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726678 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=725352 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727273 can't see version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727159 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713774 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729232 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729220 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693178 brisbane in windsor category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699698 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699701 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=645100 no resolution
jabski Posted May 1, 2008 Posted May 1, 2008 wrong cpu - E8400 not Q6600 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729432
knopflerbruce Posted May 1, 2008 Posted May 1, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729893 -No CPU description, and the superpi screen looks... weird:o Compare with other runs, too! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=618530 - obviously wrong pifast version (10 sec difference to #2) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617702 - NO verification at all (I know it's a bit old, but lack of proof is an understatement) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=491165 - really old result, but no CPU info (which makes me think it may not have been valid when it was submitted) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617490 - NO verification (same as 617702) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556050 - same as above http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617563 - same as above
Recommended Posts